Because it's a penalty to Rangers.Why is this even a point of discussion?
Exactly.Because it's a penalty to Rangers.
exactly, it was blatantWhy is this even a point of discussion?
because the press is desperate for there to be some sort of controversy around this. they want nothing more than an absolute fucking frenzy to be whipped up over the next week or so because of thisWhy is this even a point of discussion?
SFA should be disciplining someone to put an end to this nonsense. And bring in VAR.Why is this even a point of discussion?
We all know why.Why is this even a point of discussion?
Thank god he admitted it, it's not as though there was a tv camera there picking up the fact that there was significant contact.
What good would VAR do in convincing them? They've watched it back numerous times and still say it wasn't a penalty. Ffs they even admit there was contact and still can't say it was a penalty!SFA should be disciplining someone to put an end to this nonsense. And bring in VAR.
To be fair they were both laughing at one point - presume that was the same time and it was mutualWas this fanny trying to belittle GVB with the sarcastic laughing during the game or was it a genuine mutual thing they were both laughing at?
He's good a good reputation as a coach within the game but recently has come across as an absolute twat.
Porteous sold the jersey again
Anyone who says it wasn't a penalty needs to go look at the rules of the game, because it's in the box doesn't mean it wasn’t a foul, minimal contact or full contact.
50/50 ffs was as clear a 100% penalty as you would see absolute nonsense to claim otherwise!