Illegal sports streaming – accessing the inaccessible

mdingwall

Administrator

Illegal sports streaming – accessing the inaccessible​

The transition to online sports consumption has pushed illegal streaming further into the path of the mainstream sports fan.

Access is a key factor in driving users to stream sports illegally. When no legitimate providers in a country have rights for an event, consumers feel they have no legal viewing alternative. While many sports leagues provide access to watch all matches, some do not – perhaps most notably the Premier League whose domestic contracts currently allow for the broadcast of only 200 games per season (increased to 220 for 2020/21).

Dedicated sports fans are consistently more likely to view content illegally than lighter followers, mostly to access games not included in Pay TV packages. Other drivers include limited or restricted streaming options for use on mobile or tablet devices, as well as a desire to sidestep contracts and hassle of installation.

Finally, cost is also key in determining why users choose illegal alternatives. Lighter users may not value a particular sport or event sufficiently to commit to a full legal subscription, while lower-income consumers may seek cheaper alternatives, particularly for a secondary service for sports not covered by their main TV package.

How big is the illegal sports streaming market?​

Research from Synamedia found that 51% of dedicated sports fans watch illegal sports streaming services at least once a month, while only 16% say they never watch via illegal sources. Nearly a third (31%) of those who watch content illegally regularly claim they do so because the event they watch isn’t shown locally.

The survey of 6,000 sports fans found that 74% would use a legal service if a legitimate alternative were available and illegal streams became unreliable. Over a quarter of those using illegal sites and services (29%) have paid for access, with 52% of those most likely to switch to legal platforms pay for illegal streaming services already.

Illegally streaming Premier League matches made up 4% of streaming use in 2020 (UK)​

Use of streaming services in the United Kingdom, December 2019-2020
Use of streaming services in the United Kingdom, December 2019-2020
According to a survey from Finder, at least 5.8 million Brits watched content illegally in 2020, of which almost 2 million people admitted to using an illegal stream to watch a Premier League match.

Findings from the Intellectual Property Office (IPO) show that 15% of overall consumers have engaged with live sports (i.e. either by streaming or sharing) in the three months to December 2021, which is almost twice the figure for the same period in 2020 (8%). However, the overall level of infringement (i.e. anyone who had used an illegal source for live sport in the past three months) actually decreased, from 37% in 2020 to 29% in 2021, though this does remain above the average infringement levels of other content types (25%).

Only 70% of live sport consumers do so in a completely legal manner​

Infringement among live sport consumers (% difference to same period in 2020)
Infringement among live sport consumers (% difference to same period in 2020)
Football is by far the most illegally accessed sport, accounting for 27.4% of illegal downloads and views in sports. Other notable sports include basketball (just behind football at 25.5%), mixed sporting events such as athletics championships (13.0%), tennis (10.5%) and motor sports (8.5%).

Proportion of illegally accessed content, by sport
Proportion of illegally accessed content, by sport
Last season, the Premier League blocked more than 200,000 pirate broadcasts with the financial damage estimated to cost the market around £1 million in revenue per game.

What are the risks to users?​

The negative implications of illegal streaming does not sit just with the broadcasters or sports clubs, but also with users themselves. According to Crimestoppers data, approximately 3.4 million illegal streamers across all markets are infected with computer viruses per year, while 1.5 million had personal details harvested, 1.3 million were hacked and 0.9 million had money stolen online. According to research commissioned by the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), nearly half of all respondents said they would be willing to share their personal email address in order to gain access to an illicit stream.

Cybersecurity firm Webroot recently found that 92% of illegal streaming sites over a single weekend were promoting a range of Bitcoin and mobile app scams, as well as containing malware threats. Some recorded examples crimes carried out by hosts of illicit streams include using a viewer’s device to mine cryptocurrency, stealing personal information leading to fraud and hijacking webcams by tricking users into downloading fake video players.

As well as to being targeted by the host sites of illegal streams, users can also be targeted by the providing organisations in conjunction with law enforcement officials for breaching piracy laws. A recent court judgement highlighted that consumers risk criminal prosecution by using a modified box or stick, unauthorised website, app, add-on or other illegal source devices to illegally stream content.

What is being done to combat illegal streaming?​

Leagues and broadcasters are trying to strengthen their response to illegal streaming. In May 2021, European Parliament urged Member States to enable legal measures to support crackdown efforts. European legislators adopted a proposal to combat online piracy of live sporting events that includes the option to block illegal broadcasts within 30 minutes. MEPs said the new rules should not target consumers, who are often not aware that the content they are watching is illegal, but insure the issue is confronted at source.

Additionally, they called on the European Commission to amend the legislation on intellectual property rights in regard to live sporting events, which are not protected by the bloc’s copyright rules.

This has resonated at league level, with a recent ruling through the Spanish courts granting La Liga and Movistar+ authorisation to request directly to major internet providers that they block domains that are streaming illegal sports content. They requested judicial authorisation to obtain an “agile and immediate tool” to fight against piracy of exclusive sporting events, in line with what was approved by the European Parliament. With league and club revenues under renewed pressure it seems likely that further developments will come.
 
Ouch!

According to Crimestoppers data, approximately 3.4 million illegal streamers across all markets are infected with computer viruses per year, while 1.5 million had personal details harvested, 1.3 million were hacked and 0.9 million had money stolen online. According to research commissioned by the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), nearly half of all respondents said they would be willing to share their personal email address in order to gain access to an illicit stream.

Cybersecurity firm Webroot recently found that 92% of illegal streaming sites over a single weekend were promoting a range of Bitcoin and mobile app scams, as well as containing malware threats. Some recorded examples crimes carried out by hosts of illicit streams include using a viewer’s device to mine cryptocurrency, stealing personal information leading to fraud and hijacking webcams by tricking users into downloading fake video players.
 
Ouch!

According to Crimestoppers data, approximately 3.4 million illegal streamers across all markets are infected with computer viruses per year, while 1.5 million had personal details harvested, 1.3 million were hacked and 0.9 million had money stolen online. According to research commissioned by the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), nearly half of all respondents said they would be willing to share their personal email address in order to gain access to an illicit stream.

Cybersecurity firm Webroot recently found that 92% of illegal streaming sites over a single weekend were promoting a range of Bitcoin and mobile app scams, as well as containing malware threats. Some recorded examples crimes carried out by hosts of illicit streams include using a viewer’s device to mine cryptocurrency, stealing personal information leading to fraud and hijacking webcams by tricking users into downloading fake video players.
been doing it for years and never had an issue like this. My only complaint is when it freezes and refreshing (bit like RTV :)), does my head in but i cant complain.

I now pay netflix, rtv and dazn, if i had more money id pay to watch more live sports legally but i cant afford it so watch elsewhere.
 
Music on CD wasn’t easily accessible and usually had to buy an expensive album instead of just the songs you wanted. Outcome: Napster/Limewire pirating.

Along came Spotify/Apple music which made it easier to listen to what you want, and cheaper, and pirating of music has nearly died out.

Movies were so expensive to rent or go to the cinema. Outcome: The Pirate Bay and torrent pirating.

Along came Netflix which made it cheaper and more accessible. Movie pirating was less common. Now though there are Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Disney+… and more. So it’s becoming more expensive and less accessible. No wonder pirating is coming back.

Sports used to be on Sky. Now it’s on Sky, BT, Amazon, Premier Sports and god knows what else. Outcome; pirating.

The trend is obvious and has been happening for decades; make it affordable and accessible and folk will pay. Take the piss and folk will pirate.
 
Ouch!

According to Crimestoppers data, approximately 3.4 million illegal streamers across all markets are infected with computer viruses per year, while 1.5 million had personal details harvested, 1.3 million were hacked and 0.9 million had money stolen online. According to research commissioned by the Federation Against Copyright Theft (FACT), nearly half of all respondents said they would be willing to share their personal email address in order to gain access to an illicit stream.

Cybersecurity firm Webroot recently found that 92% of illegal streaming sites over a single weekend were promoting a range of Bitcoin and mobile app scams, as well as containing malware threats. Some recorded examples crimes carried out by hosts of illicit streams include using a viewer’s device to mine cryptocurrency, stealing personal information leading to fraud and hijacking webcams by tricking users into downloading fake video players.
Ah, so they do exist. The people who click the "BEAUTIFUL WOMEN ARE LOOKING FOR YOU IN *Insert wee nearby town*" ads are actually real!
 
As said above there's to many alternatives to watch scottish football is 3 subscriptions the associations I get have to make money but they are ripping of their own supporters doing it
 
I quite happily pay Rangers for all available games on RTV and head out to my mates for all other Rangers games, the licence fee and Amazon Prime is all we pay for and have access to a Netflix account.
 
Music on CD wasn’t easily accessible and usually had to buy an expensive album instead of just the songs you wanted. Outcome: Napster/Limewire pirating.

Along came Spotify/Apple music which made it easier to listen to what you want, and cheaper, and pirating of music has nearly died out.

Movies were so expensive to rent or go to the cinema. Outcome: The Pirate Bay and torrent pirating.

Along came Netflix which made it cheaper and more accessible. Movie pirating was less common. Now though there are Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Disney+… and more. So it’s becoming more expensive and less accessible. No wonder pirating is coming back.

Sports used to be on Sky. Now it’s on Sky, BT, Amazon, Premier Sports and god knows what else. Outcome; pirating.

The trend is obvious and has been happening for decades; make it affordable and accessible and folk will pay. Take the piss and folk will pirate.

I'm sure pirating didn't have as big an affect on movies as it did on others. The thoughts were that people who pirated movies were never going to go to the cinema and see it regardless.
 
Music on CD wasn’t easily accessible and usually had to buy an expensive album instead of just the songs you wanted. Outcome: Napster/Limewire pirating.

Along came Spotify/Apple music which made it easier to listen to what you want, and cheaper, and pirating of music has nearly died out.

Movies were so expensive to rent or go to the cinema. Outcome: The Pirate Bay and torrent pirating.

Along came Netflix which made it cheaper and more accessible. Movie pirating was less common. Now though there are Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, Disney+… and more. So it’s becoming more expensive and less accessible. No wonder pirating is coming back.

Sports used to be on Sky. Now it’s on Sky, BT, Amazon, Premier Sports and god knows what else. Outcome; pirating.

The trend is obvious and has been happening for decades; make it affordable and accessible and folk will pay. Take the piss and folk will pirate.
Nailed it.
 
I know people who subscribe to everything but work shifts, have family commitments and rarely see a live match.

That is just mental to me.

If your finances and life balance allows it then sure, why not get all the subscriptions up and running?

I usually use Now TV to get the OF game on and make sure I'm free to watch any other games on the 24 hr pass but anything else I wouldn't bother.
 
The Spotify model is the way to combat illegal sport streaming.

Albeit we’d pretty much have to hand ownership of all rights over to one company.
Not necessarily looking a bad thing in todays “pay 6 companies a fee to watch 1 sport” world.
Pay 6 companies to watch 1 team. It’s even worse
 
this is going the same way as the music industry, greedy companies getting greedier by the minute. CD`s were cheaper to make than cassettes, considerably so, but they made them more expensive to buy, why because they could.

then the internet came and they couldn`t. got pirated into oblivion and had to come up with spotify type services to try and get a fair price for fair access.

football rights will go exactly the same way IMO.
 
Spotify changed the game for me when it came to music. I went from downloading rips illegally and not paying a penny to happily paying £15pm for a family subscription. Over the course of the last 15 years or so I have paid £2000+ on music, when I never would have paid a penny before, and would probably never directly pay for music still.

Having something like that, or having legit TV prices comparable to IPTV costs (£10-20pm) is the only way I can see it changing.
Nailed it, Spotify/Apple Music is easier than downloading rips and at a cost you don't miss

They have this for football and we all sign up.

Doubt they ever would though
 
Music on CD wasn’t easily accessible - apart from in shops. Who ever struggled to buy a CD?!

Along came Spotify/Apple music which made it easier to listen to what you want, and cheaper - because they don't pay artists, and pirating of music has nearly died out - unless you rename if theft which is what it is.

Not sure musicians would agree that anything has been improved.
 
Not sure musicians would agree that anything has been improved.
Inaccessible as in you had to go out and buy a CD, usually an album. The cost to do that vs streaming was much higher.

I don’t doubt the money going to the artist is much less but does the average consumer know or care about that?
 
Nailed it, Spotify/Apple Music is easier than downloading rips and at a cost you don't miss

They have this for football and we all sign up.

Doubt they ever would though
It's mental when you think about it. The price of sports subscriptions is directly linked to the amount of money ploughed into the game by companies vying to get the contracts.

I think I would be comfortable paying upto £30pm for all sports. I don't watch any of the other 300+ channels that you have to take as part of the deal, so why should I pay for it?

I think if you want to throw broadband prices into then I think £50pm for every single sports channel and broadband would be a figure that most people would accept paying. When I see threads of folk paying £100+ a month for Sky I can't get my head round it.

EDIT: spelling mistake
 
Last edited:
Genuinely amazed people still pay for sky. Not missed anything I have wanted to watch in a long time
Agreed. I went for Virgins top package but cancelled before it started. Ended up going for broadband only and just watching Netflix, iplayer, YouTube, Amazon etc. Genuinely don’t miss having the top TV package.
 
Inaccessible as in you had to go out and buy a CD, usually an album. The cost to do that vs streaming was much higher.

I don’t doubt the money going to the artist is much less but does the average consumer know or care about that?
Too long a debate....unless you shop for CDs at Asda you will notice....not saying you are wrong but being a working musician with time, space and income to create is all but impossible now.
 
Pay to listen to "Crags", Andy Walker and Michael Stewart, or watch illegally? Hmmm...
There's this as well.
Take Sky. How many people who complain about Crocker, Walker, that Elvish lassie presenter et al pay about 60 quid a month for the privelege of listening to them and the excitement of Leicester v Southampton on a Sunday?

Fair enough though if you like all the other sports the channels cover and footy is only a part of it.
 
Back
Top