Am I correct in my understanding that Neely did not have physical contact with the lad concerned and the offence was limited to threatening to “spank” him?The fact he didn’t participate at a SFA approved level again didn’t even merit a mention in their whitewashed inquiry as it didn’t suit the number one objective; to muddy the waters to protect one football team.
When paedos like Neely dies the victims best chance of getting justice will be for independent inquiries to get finding of facts and make judgments on this, this inquiry did none of that. They were interested in that small article to engineer an equivalent to what happened at that bastardised team to muddy the waters. The complete opposite to what it should of been about.
This would of course be distressing for the boy concerned.