Not being sexist or ought, but the fact we are referring to 'she' and 'her' when talking about governing our game, the men's game, is outrageous.
Not being sexist or ought, but the fact we are referring to 'she' and 'her' when talking about governing our game, the men's game, is outrageous.
By a Woman or a manDespite your little disclaimer, that is 100% sexist. The suggestion that a woman is unable - or shouldn't be able - to hold that sort of position because it's men out on the pitch is laughable. She may not be up to the task of actually doing the job, but that's nothing to do with her gender. Kindly get fucked.
We will see if it gets mentioned on the BBC news in Scotland tonight, won't be holding my breath.
Well said Stuart.
Cheers OP.
This also applies to Pundits... I would much rather listen to (and watch) Alex Scott than either crocker or walker any day of the week.Despite your little disclaimer, that is 100% sexist. The suggestion that a woman is unable - or shouldn't be able - to hold that sort of position because it's men out on the pitch is laughable. She may not be up to the task of actually doing the job, but that's nothing to do with her gender. Kindly get fucked.
There's a difference between fans "knowing" something and the club using its official channel with its Chief Exec making it public. This clearly exerts more pressure than fans on here or on Twitter getting angry and frustrated. We have it confirmed that the club is pretty much in line with fan opinion over this and that they are actively trying to do something about it.Doesn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know.
The battle fever is on I love it
Not being sexist or ought, but the fact we are referring to 'she' and 'her' when talking about governing our game, the men's game, is outrageous.
Doesn’t tell us anything we didn’t already know.
Fair play to the club and Robertson for doing this. They've just outlined most of the major gripes that we've had with the whole compliance system this season in particular. I think it strikes the right balance between asking the pertinent questions and hinting at what might be driving the way in which the compliance system is treating us.
My only slight complaint would be the desire to "return to last seasons system". That was just as flawed, there needs to be a root and branch review, not just a bit of tinkering.
Whilst I'm glad to see and hear this, and it's long overdue, if we had taken our chances on the pitch this season we'd be ahead of the filth in the league... regardless of the shambolic disciplinary shenanigans in Scotland.
I'm slightly dubious about whether this is a bit of deflection going on. I still cannot warm to Robertson if I'm honest.
We have all been moaning about the club staying quiet then they speak up and your still moaning
Absolutely for the simple reason don she knows what she's talking aboutThis also applies to Pundits... I would much rather listen to (and watch) Alex Scott than either crocker or walker any day of the week.
Despite your little disclaimer, that is 100% sexist. The suggestion that a woman is unable - or shouldn't be able - to hold that sort of position because it's men out on the pitch is laughable. She may not be up to the task of actually doing the job, but that's nothing to do with her gender. Kindly get fucked.
If the BBC have banned themselves from Ibrox then can we ban them from showing our highlights? Therefore there would be no trial by sportsceneHead shot to the BBC. Saying the biased pundits doing the coverage are influencing the compliance officer and basically only our players get highlighted in a game.
If the BBC have banned themselves from Ibrox then can we ban them from showing our highlights? Therefore there would be no trial by sportscene
Hope so. We should look into giving them a blackout of any coverageIf the BBC have banned themselves from Ibrox then can we ban them from showing our highlights? Therefore there would be no trial by sportscene