Cutty/Young
Well-Known Member
Nope was a Rangers supporter who said he read it on twitter.Guessing it was a non Rangers fan who said this rubbish Puma deal expired we signed a deal with Hummel simples
Nope was a Rangers supporter who said he read it on twitter.Guessing it was a non Rangers fan who said this rubbish Puma deal expired we signed a deal with Hummel simples
Mercy,Mercy me,I'd have thought we'd have heard something through the grapevine by now..Lol.
Anybody know what's going on; actually going on?
Nope was a Rangers supporter who said he read it on twitter.
I hope so, never had official word from the club about that project since it was first mentioned, we’re probably due an update.Was the plan that the store was to be the new ticket centre and the Edmiston house to be the Club shop and Museum? Part of the 2022 anniversary?
First thing we need to do when we get it back is stop calling it a “ megastore “ . Sounds as cheap and nasty as it currently is .
Perhaps just something simple like “ the Rangers shop” or hopefully the new ticket office ?
Nope,I know him and he's a Rangers supporter.Kid on Rangers fan no doubt
If we get rid of the fat man i'll be looking for sexual healingMercy,Mercy me,I'd have thought we'd have heard something through the grapevine by now..
It is believed by some (me included) that the Judge has provided a ruling with regards the Rangers v Sports Direct case.
It would appear that ruling is not yet in the public domain. There could be a few reasons for that.
The megastore at Ibrox, operated by SD was not open today, or at least part of today, when it normally would have been.
There is conjecture that the Judge's ruling may have something to do with that. I agree with that position.
I take this as a positive sign, however that is just a feeling based on the limited information available. If it was in SD's favour why would the megastore be closed.
As far as I am aware nothing more than that is known (or reasonably guessed at), at least by anyone willing / able to talk about it just now.
Look what happened to himMarvin Gaye said the same thing mate..
Someone on RM claiming we may have asked to settle out of court at the 13th hour. Nothing else posted about it.
Was the plan that the store was to be the new ticket centre and the Edmiston house to be the Club shop and Museum? Part of the 2022 anniversary?
If we could settle out of court do they not think we would have done it already FFS.
Should have been called the mugastore , because of those giant sized sports direct mugs, they sent one out to me in Australia with a Rangers top order (years ago) must've cost me a fortune as their mailing costs were huge.Very good point.
If we could settle out of court do they not think we would have done it already FFS.
That was the one plan that Charles Green announced that was absolutely the right thing to do. Never heard or read that the current board will do it. The ticket office is an utter disgrace looks like a building site office and Edmiston House should be a shop a museum and a cafe bar. Can’t see that happening.
We’ve likely got the best ticket office in Scottish football but that edminston house building likely has a lot of problems
I would be happy we settled at the 11th hour!Someone on RM claiming we may have asked to settle out of court at the 13th hour. Nothing else posted about it.
I was talking aesthetically mate it looks temporary and it looks like they were borrowed from Barrett’s after they built some houses. Green wanted them gone and the current shop to be the new ticket office. Edmiston House would then House a huge super store museum and cafe bar. The offices in the Copland and Broomloan stands were to be refurbished.
All of that needs to be done urgently in my opinion.
I don't think it was the Spivs. I think it was a clause put in when the 7 year deal was ended. I think Kings lawyers balls'd it up and missed it. I may be wrong.
Far from being clueless, I have followed the retail litigation closely.They already are, you really dont have a clue about any of this.
We may have asked for a deal, just like we may have won or may have lost.Someone on RM claiming we may have asked to settle out of court at the 13th hour. Nothing else posted about it.
I have no clue about courts etc but surely the judge can't give his judgement the day before the actual hearing?Normally the solicitors involved get a copy of the written judgement the day before the hearing by email and the judgement is embargoed until the hearing is out the way. I don’t think there’s been a judgement provided unless perhaps the judge has asked for the parties to review the decision over the weekend and provide any corrections to factual errors before it’s handed down. But more likely it sounds like the judge in this case needs more time to finalise his decision.
I don’t know the ins and the outs of this case but given we haven’t had any joy so far i’m not expecting anything overly positive but who knows.
It was a judgement hearing.I have no clue about courts etc but surely the judge can't give his judgement the day before the actual hearing?
Isnt the hearing where the lawyers argue their case to try convince the judge?
My question here is why SD would now want a retail deal?Far from being clueless, I have followed the retail litigation closely.
The inevitable outcome of this case ( 726) is that we will sign a contract with SD on the terms decided by the judge. This contract will run untIl the summer of 2020 but will have little effect if we continue to boycott and buy from Elite instead. However, it is inconceivable that Hummel would not have a contractual obligation to supply our ‘ official partner’
That is why SD brought the second case (631). He is trying to bring Hummel and the manufacturing into the equation because the first case won’t harm us ( other than paying his legal costs if the judge sides with his interpretation of the terms). This is the case that went to speedy trial in April and the judgement is still awaited.
My question here is why SD would now want a retail deal?
They’ll get zilch from it.
Why they’d now want stock from Hummel.
Stock they’ll be stuck with.
I’m thinking it’s now all about damages and awards.
Hope you’re correct here.It’s a positive outcome for us 100 percent I can feel it keep believing
It’s a positive outcome for us 100 percent I can feel it keep believing
They will have a retail deal whether they want one or not.My question here is why SD would now want a retail deal?
They’ll get zilch from it.
Why they’d now want stock from Hummel.
Stock they’ll be stuck with.
I’m thinking it’s now all about damages and awards.
Far from being clueless, I have followed the retail litigation closely.
The inevitable outcome of this case ( 726) is that we will sign a contract with SD on the terms decided by the judge. This contract will run untIl the summer of 2020 but will have little effect if we continue to boycott and buy from Elite instead. However, it is inconceivable that Hummel would not have a contractual obligation to supply our ‘ official partner’
That is why SD brought the second case (631). He is trying to bring Hummel and the manufacturing into the equation because the first case won’t harm us ( other than paying his legal costs if the judge sides with his interpretation of the terms). This is the case that went to speedy trial in April and the judgement is still awaited.
I doubt Hummel would want to be sued by Jabba.
I doubt any manufacturer of strips would choose to exclude SD and make an enemy of Ashley
I meant the lawyers dealing with it and not Dave Kings in particular.Dave King has different lawyers from Rangers so that’s incorrect mate
Some c&@t get down there pronto and see if it’s still closed lol
Certainly one of us doesn’t have a clue and it won’t be me eating humble pie when the judgement is published.2 Days ago you posted this.
Like I said, you dont have a clue.
I’ll take a drive round right now. I’ll report back shortly