Pretty sure Gazza was the gaffers idol growing up. Pretty sure I seen a documentary type programme where he is back where he grew up and talks about having his Gazza England jersey on.
The way you're coming across, I'm rather glad of that. Gerrard through sheer hard work and determination pulled Liverpool along and handed them the UCL. Gazza was on a different planet football wise.Lmao. If you think Gerrard didn't inspire Liverpool time after time you're on a different fucking planet to myself.
Have some of you been on the sauce or what?! Fucking ridiculous comments.
The way you're coming across, I'm rather glad of that. Gerrard through sheer hard work and determination pulled Liverpool along and handed them the UCL. Gazza was on a different planet football wise.
Theres no doubting Gerrard was a top footballer, likewise Lampard, but for sheer skill and entertainment Gazza was different class.i think he's spot on , gazza was a genius but gerrard was top class for near 15 years
Theres no doubting Gerrard was a top footballer, likewise Lampard, but for sheer skill and entertainment Gazza was different class.
Aberdeen at Ibrox to win the league. League cup final v Hearts at the piggery.Yeah, it wasn't his quality that won games for Liverpool. Just hard work and a bit of elbow grease...
Name me a game where Gazza virtually won a game by himself for his team as Gerrard did against West Ham in the FA Cup Final?
Yeah, it wasn't his quality that won games for Liverpool. Just hard work and a bit of elbow grease...
Name me a game where Gazza virtually won a game by himself for his team as Gerrard did against West Ham in the FA Cup Final?
Aberdeen at Ibrox to win the league. League cup final v Hearts at the piggery.
yes , he was a magician , a genius but gerrard all round game was better, gerrard is the best england have produced , there was literally nothing gerrard couldnt do
But the question was, who was the best player, not the most effective. There is a difference.No one would deny that. But there's much more to football than skill and being entertaining on a football pitch.
But the question was, who was the best player, not the most effective. There is a difference.
Rooney. Lmao. I’m seriously wondering how much of Gascoigne you’ve ever seen.
Gazza’s ballboy by comparison.
Aberdeen at Ibrox to win the league. League cup final v Hearts at the piggery.
Us vs Aberdeen for 8 in a rowYeah, it wasn't his quality that won games for Liverpool. Just hard work and a bit of elbow grease...
Name me a game where Gazza virtually won a game by himself for his team as Gerrard did against West Ham in the FA Cup Final?
I'll still go with Gerrard then seeing as he produced for his club for 15 years or more, and not just two or thee seasons.
Total bullshit mate.Who's England record goalscorer? United's record goalscorer? Yes, Rooney generally played further up the pitch than Gascoigne admittedly. But despite having less talent Rooney will be remembered as a legend for what he achieved over a long period of time, and that's despite having some issues of his own as he was hardly an angel. Gascoigne is more remembered in a sympathetic sort of what for what he could have achieved and not for what he actually did.
The top 1. It’s not even remotely close in my opinion.If every England player from last 20 years done a poll of the greatest ever English player... Rooney wouldn’t even make top 10. Gazza would at least be top 3.
you really are an ignorant boorish chunt or a top troller...Hmm but what do think?
I think if Gazza never played for us a lot more people would be saying SG.
Just someone with an opinion on a forum, that's all. The fact that you are obviously so bothered by that has got me thinking that you have some deep mental issues. Seek help asap, for your own sake and everybody around you.
Just someone with an opinion on a forum, that's all. The fact that you are obviously so bothered by that has got me thinking that you have some deep mental issues. Seek help asap, for your own sake and everybody around you.
You're evading the question again, the question was not who was at the top the longest, the most effective or any other slant you want to introduce into the argument. Who was the best footballer.I'll still go with Gerrard then seeing as he produced for his club for 15 years or more, and not just two or thee seasons.
gerrard literally inspired a bang average liverpool team to win the champions league
Aberdeen at Ibrox to win the league. League cup final v Hearts at the piggery.
If you don't think Gazza is a legend and that he is somehow felt sorry for go and have a look at what those who played with him had to say about him. You think that Gerrards a better player and that's fair enough but why your trying to run down a Rangers legend on a Rangers forum is baffling mate.
They weren’t bang average at all though. Hyperbolic nonsense right up there with Maradona and the 86 World Cup. You can say Gerrard was brilliant and Liverpool’s driving force without making crap up.
The fact he even asked that question given the importance of these performances to us is beyond embarrassing, Rangers fan? Starting to doubt it.
Also the notion Ronaldinho isn’t one of the best players to ever play the game and was just a show pony for entertainments sake suggests this poster shouldn’t be talking about any football prior to about 2008. In fact I’m starting to doubt he’s even old enough to remember Barry Ferguson.
You're evading the question again, the question was not who was at the top the longest, the most effective or any other slant you want to introduce into the argument. Who was the best footballer.
At no point in this thread have I said he wasn't a Rangers legend. I also haven't said that he wasn't a ridiculously gifted player. I simply would chose Gerrard over him for the reasons I've given and don't think Paul was quite the player he could have been under different circumstances. I'm not sure why people are getting so upset over it.
And who has been giving that notion to you, you weirdo? Because I mentioned Ronaldinho but it certainly wasn't me.
Still waiting for someone to make a convincing case that Gascoigne had a better all round game than Gerrard also. All I keep seeing is skill and entertainment mentioned... But if it was those two things alone then Ronaldinho would be named as the best footballer of all time.
At no point in this thread have I said he wasn't a Rangers legend. I also haven't said that he wasn't a ridiculously gifted player. I simply would chose Gerrard over him for the reasons I've given and don't think Paul was quite the player he could have been under different circumstances. I'm not sure why people are getting so upset over it.
Pretty certain most England fans will have him down as a legend also.
Hmmmmmm
More than likely. But his goal against Scotland apart I think he would be known more for crying after their defeat to Italy in the World Cup ovet anything else he did for England.
Well, lets see...you insulted Gazza, you belittled him, you are totally clueless over what he achieved, you have been disparaging to fellow posters as dumb and ignorant.
But hey, why are folk getting upset at you?
More than likely. But his goal against Scotland apart I think he would be known more for crying after their defeat to Italy in the World Cup ovet anything else he did for England.
It was Germany, and he wasn’t crying over defeat.
That's right. Penalties wasn't it? And what was he crying over then? (Genuine question)
But he didn't. He only has himself to blame for that. Football genius with the ball at his feet but thick as pig shit and mentally weak.
Complete and utter bollocks mate. His performance against Holland in that world Cup was as good as any I have ever seen for a start.
He never became a global superstar on the back of crying against Germany it was his performances at the world cup.
He's having a nightmare here and he doesn't like facts.It was Germany, and he wasn’t crying over defeat.
Well, lets see...you insulted Gazza, you belittled him, you are totally clueless over what he achieved, you have been disparaging to fellow posters as dumb and ignorant.
But hey, why are folk getting upset at you?
Because he got booked and would miss the final.