Grigo Yossarian
Well-Known Member
It was in an Edinburgh court, I'm sure.
Wasn't Patrick from Thompson's Solicitors. It was a female solicitor who I've forgotten the name of.
Kim Leslie, of Digby Brown.
That went to court & she roasted them.
It was in an Edinburgh court, I'm sure.
Wasn't Patrick from Thompson's Solicitors. It was a female solicitor who I've forgotten the name of.
Also, how come it's civil court action they're pursuing and not criminal?
Editorial staff will set tone. We all know the leanings of PQ editorial staff.I'd imagine she doesn't write the script for every piece - will be following a brief from production team.
My view of this has always been that the Insurer’s investigation was more to determine if they (they insurer’s) have any liability rather than to establish any wrongdoing (which was a given).
The fact the case is proceeding to court suggests to me that either a. the insurer’s think they have a decent chance of winning (unlikely) or b. They’ve washed their hands of it, told the tims they are own their own and Celtic are being forced to court as they need to do everything to avoid paying out.
Kim Leslie, of Digby Brown.
That went to court & she roasted them.
The bbc are a disgusting organisation. Clearly on the side of that filth not justice.
They don't care that kids were abused, they only care that it was exposed.Talking about it with a Celtic fan I know and he had the typical response. How can they sue the club they have no evidence and the boys club is not even connected to the club. They have no shame or sympathy for the people that it has happened too.
The Rangers sub reddit is full of mentally challengeds as well
Paranoia at best. Do you mean the interview where Davidson tried to bully her and then complained and was supported by Michael Kelly ?I've already seen history on her pro nationalist stance in relation to an interview with Ian
Davidson KBHB.
BBC were once renowned for their objectivity.
Actually separate entity is a very recent argument , it only arrived in the last two years mate .What an absolutely disgusting interview technique from a government employee. Interrupting a lawyer representing Child Sex abuse victims every answer to ask pre-planned questions, including at least 3 times parroting the separate entity lie which the paedo ring have hidden behind for decades.
In any future independent investigation into how one football team was allowed to abuse so many children and cover it up, the BBC needs to be one of the first organisations looked at.
Actually separate entity is a very recent argument , it only arrived in the last two years mate .
Your bang on though re that bbc Scotland interview it was bbc producers laying Celtics arguments to the victims representative as they continue to lie and hide . Ira tactics for Ira fc.
Bbc Scotland is clearly infiltrated with Celtic representatives . Scandalous .
Actually separate entity is a very recent argument , it only arrived in the last two years mate .
Your bang on though re that bbc Scotland interview it was bbc producers laying Celtics arguments to the victims representative as they continue to lie and hide . Ira tactics for Ira fc.
Bbc Scotland is clearly infiltrated with Celtic representatives . Scandalous .
I would like to see the financial controller explaining to a judge why Celtic chose to pay over a £1m to jim Torbett after he had been convicted!McGuire added: “ We are now in a position where Celtic’s management will appear in court to argue that these victims are owed nothing by Celtic. Shame on them."
Celtic's management?
Who in their right mind would stand up there and make a complete and utter khunt of themselves?
I'd give my left hairy egg to see The Fat Japanese stuttering and spluttering as McGuire rips him a new one.
It was in an Edinburgh court, I'm sure.
Wasn't Patrick McGuire from Thompson's Solicitors. It was a female solicitor who I've forgotten the name of.
Found it. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-49380349
Are the court transcripts available?
Surely that case alone blows their whole separate entity line out the water?
They've accepted and admitted liability here.
I'd love to see Lawwell being made to give evidence.I would like to see the financial controller explaining to a judge why Celtic chose to pay over a £1m to jim Torbett after he had been convicted!
Paranoia at best. Do you mean the interview where Davidson tried to bully her and then complained and was supported by Michael Kelly ?
No idea of her politics, but she has a masters degree in Human Rights Law.
I would like to see the financial controller explaining to a judge why Celtic chose to pay over a £1m to jim Torbett after he had been convicted!
That odious creep turns up everywhere! I am sure it is him on the Scottish sun comments pages too. No one in full time employment could spend as much time as he does on social media. An abusive and disgusting little paedo excuser hiding behind his keyboard!
Someone posted earlier that the story has only broke in The Guardian in Australia. This isn’t true. It has broke in the UK. The Guardian has an Australian edition and also American. Soon it will be worldwide.
Quite apt that the 25000th post on this thread was showing a tweet for alex Thomson and the separate entity lie.
I recall having a heated conversation with one of them a while back about this coming back to bite them and his answer was "Look, it's simple, you lot fiddled the books, we fiddled with weans, we aw need to move on" -...... and that was the last words we had. Calmly put the remains of my pint down and walked away as I knew if I'd stayed I would have got lifted.Quite right GW.
I don't judge people on their religion but, by %^*&, some of these guys make it so apparent
that they are ingrained in it from childhood.
no idea of her Politics ??? but she happens to be a supporter of the Cult that has done nothing to help this investigation and the poor victims.Glad you supported her interviewing approach of a guy trying to get justice for victims
abused & then ignored for decades mate
Utter scum. Deflect and deny tactics classically used right there.This is what the victims and families deal with on a daily basis -
I recall having a heated conversation with one of them a while back about this coming back to bite them and his answer was "Look, it's simple, you lot fiddled the books, we fiddled with weans, we aw need to move on" -...... and that was the last words we had. Calmly put the remains of my pint down and walked away as I knew if I'd stayed I would have got lifted.
We haven't seen them if they are Alex, and the victim also wanted to retain his anonymity,
but a simple google on 'kim leslie v celtic child abuse' will allow you to see a few paper
reports.
I can’t see an insurer spending money on an investigation for anything other than to determine their liability. It’s Liewell using smoke and mirrors as always but it’s never questioned.My view of this has always been that the Insurer’s investigation was more to determine if they (they insurer’s) have any liability rather than to establish any wrongdoing (which was a given).
The fact the case is proceeding to court suggests to me that either a. the insurer’s think they have a decent chance of winning (unlikely) or b. They’ve washed their hands of it, told the tims they are own their own and Celtic are being forced to court as they need to do everything to avoid paying out.
Would anything appear in CFC's accounts - would be those due in Q3..
For the settled case or future liabilities ?
Strange. Any reason given for this?I posted something to reddit on the USA gymnastics thread, outlining the similarities, and it got removed in about 10 seconds.
I can’t see an insurer spending money on an investigation for anything other than to determine their liability. It’s Liewell using smoke and mirrors as always but it’s never questioned.
Swear to God GY, he said it in a jokey manner with not a hint of abhorrence for what his beloved club had done to those kids. That's what you are up against here.... p.s - the work you boys have done has to be commended.Horrific mate. Fucking up children's lives & that's the reaction to it ?
Swear to God GY, he said it in a jokey manner with not a hint of abhorrence for what his beloved club had done to those kids. That's what you are up against here.... p.s - the work you boys have done has to be commended.
All of a sudden Daly makes comment. Where have you been the last 3 years? Have Hollicom stopped paying you?This is what the victims and families deal with on a daily basis -
Everything else goes out the window when it comes to a nat defending nats. The mere mention of a nat ensures nats take the opposite view, regardless what or who is involved.I know she does Jim.
Glad you supported her interviewing approach of a guy trying to get justice for victims
abused & then ignored for decades mate
You would expect to see it CB, as it should be material enough to require an
explanatory note to the accounts.
But there's been nowt yet. We have checked.
Could you imagine the premium you’d have to be paying for it to include a 2 year investigation? Unless it was an email one day and an email 2 years later with nothing done in between it would run into millions.In all of my working life, ive never heard of an insurer doing a 2 year inquiry on an
issue WV.
Maybe others have a different experience ?
Read that there.Ohh ohh Zoomer call being placed with the obsessed one and his lawyer.
Facts: Fantasist and looner and like’s words like weaponise and sectarian.
Vedict: Looner and ashamed to admit his club help cover up X amount of CSA cases for 50 years.
Could you imagine the premium you’d have to be paying for it to include a 2 year investigation? Unless it was an email one day and an email 2 years later with nothing done in between it would run into millions.