He really shouldn't have to, but I imagine he will now.The guy who ordered it is complete scum, however the more of these videos I see, the more I think that wagner etc should do some basic diligence on the messages they read out. Guy earns a fortune in those things.
I would expect Stewart Robertson, who as Rangers MD surely must have contacts at senior level in the Glasgow police, to read the article, pick up the phone & ask them what they are doing about it, pronto...Not seen anyone use his name yet hopefully that will come deserves everything that is coming his way, the Police should be involved over his Morelos racist comments .
It will be the usual from the Police no one has reported it yet has NBM commented they are the same.I would expect Stewart Robertson, who as Rangers MD surely must have contacts at senior level in the Glasgow police, to read the article, pick up the phone & ask them what they are doing about it, pronto...
He has never had to deal with people full of hate giving him things to say about people killed at a football match or someone who has died of a terrible disease.He does them for a laugh(£20) thinking it’s a bit of fun.Trust that shower of shite to make it sinister.Everything they touch they ruin.It is ridiculous to suggest it.
The guy gets paid £20 to set up and post a video message.
You think he should do half an hours research googling whether someone has a criminal record, a questionable past or the message is in poor taste before going ahead?
He’s a daft cun.t off the XFactor doing wacky birthday greetings ffs.
It is ridiculous to suggest it.
The guy gets paid £20 to set up and post a video message.
You think he should do half an hours research googling whether someone has a criminal record, a questionable past or the message is in poor taste before going ahead?
He’s a daft cun.t off the XFactor doing wacky birthday greetings ffs.
Here's hoping.I know some serious bluenoses from there
he will get leathered
An adult responsible for a young child has spent over £50 of his own money in an attempt to mock the deaths of 67 people just because they happen to favour a different football team than he does.
I don't understand why anyone would have that kind of thought process.
What is the law regarding this if someone pays someone to deliver a message like this warped individual did with Wagner other than being seriously offensive I don’t think any law has been broken,still not the kind of person you would like to employ but that would be up to his employer if indeed he has one.
It’s been pulled,,, what a surpriseIf it gets pulled, I’ve the screenshots
I'd clocked similar, about the b-i-l. You'd have to assume that he's on here at some point too. Mind boggling how you could associate - far less be related to - a scumbag like this.The sad part is, I know for a fact at least one member of this prick’s extended family (that I know of) is a Rangers fan (there’s several photos of him in our gear), and there’s countless pictures and videos I’ve seen of him being a loving family member with this relative. It’s bad enough coming up with that stuff when all you’ve been exposed to is pure ignorance, it’s another thing when someone you appear to care deeply about, who is so close to you, who also happens to be a supporter of the club you’re considering doing something horrendous to, and yet you still choose to do something that evil and hurtful and completely disrespect them in such a nasty way.
Boggles the mind. I just feel sorry for that relative, they must be extremely angry and upset at the moment, to say the least.
Ironically I actually wondered if Wagner could be in bother for releasing the fucker's details. He's released details of a customer (albeit a sick fucked up customer). As a slightly stupid example, I wouldn't be happy with Tesco deciding to tweet what I'd last bought with my picture and so on.He hasn’t broken the law regarding that, however his Twitter post is a contravention of Section 127 of the Communications Act. This is essentially a breach of the peace using a telecommunications network/social media etc.
Edit - I picked this up wrongly.Just read the report in the Scottish sun report , he states he had never heard of fernando where's he been living on the moon .Vile piece of shite .
I’ve not read the report but I’d imagine that it’s Wagner who claims he hasn’t heard of FR. Which I imagine would be true.Just read the report in the Scottish sun report , he states he had never heard of fernando where's he been living on the moon .Vile piece of shite .
Yeah you’re right. Although it looks like Wagner has deleted the post, it is ironic that he could end up in the dock for breaking data protection laws.Ironically I actually wondered if Wagner could be in bother for releasing the fucker's details. He's released details of a customer (albeit a sick fucked up customer). As a slightly stupid example, I wouldn't be happy with Tesco deciding to tweet what I'd last bought with my picture and so on.
For those arguing about whether Wagner should be checking up every customer, its just absurd. again, going back to Tesco, it would be like them doing a background check on me buying a cooking knife, just in case I'd previous for stabbing someone. All that's needed (and it might already be there) is some sort of disclaimer that the client takes responsibility for the content of the messages, and that anything breaking laws / decency etc will be on them. Obviously worded more appropriately than that.
It's not clear, but he's saying Wagner has never heard of Fernando, which is hardly a surprise.Doubling down then?
I can only hope that if the cops / his employers / family whoever else is close to him decide that there's nothing to see here... then he's the recipient of some "street justice" at some point.
Be aswell as handing himself in.He will be now,
He's the main front page headline story in today's Sun.
Ah, sorry, I get it now. I thought somehow the scumbag had been identified and quoted as saying he didn't know Fernando.It's not clear, but he's saying Wagner has never heard of Fernando, which is hardly a surprise.
That is based on old electoral roll information, and judging by the other names at the address, I’d say he used to live with his family as it’s the address that’s in news articles.Home address avilable on 192 if anyone has credits?
Even his name is punchable.Brian McGeechan.
Just dropping this low life’s name onto the thread again
How long ago was it? Is there a chance he’s still out on licence?I’ve worked with the guy who he shot in the face for a while now. He’s a really quiet guy who didn’t deserve what was done to him. Can’t believe that piece of shit only got 5 years. He’ll have served half of that. They should lock him up and throw away the key.
Someone must know where (if anywhere) this rat works??
Well if a lad can get 3 months for singing a fucking song then yea absolutely. A million times worseReally??
Happened in February 2011. He was jailed in July 2011 for 5 and a half years. No idea how long he served but apparently licence conditions were extended by 4 years (whatever that means).How long ago was it? Is there a chance he’s still out on licence?
Happened in February 2011. He was jailed in July 2011 for 5 and a half years. No idea how long he served but apparently licence conditions were extended by 4 years (whatever that means).
With a bit of luck this rat will get what’s coming.So racist abuse should see him go back down
Thats just the start.Throwing fences and cones, abusing their own team, vandalising an orange hall and now this. They take it well eh?
The Bold Wagner isn't fecking around in clearing his name.
Wagner | Birmingham
Wagner, Birmingham. 206 384 To se mi líbí · Mluví o tom (108). Keeping you entertained https://www.wagnerxfactor.com/www.facebook.com
Drug dealer written all over him.Someone must know where (if anywhere) this rat works??
What do you mean employer - a tim from Ruchazie.Who is his employer?
Ironically I actually wondered if Wagner could be in bother for releasing the fucker's details. He's released details of a customer (albeit a sick fucked up customer). As a slightly stupid example, I wouldn't be happy with Tesco deciding to tweet what I'd last bought with my picture and so on.
For those arguing about whether Wagner should be checking up every customer, its just absurd. again, going back to Tesco, it would be like them doing a background check on me buying a cooking knife, just in case I'd previous for stabbing someone. All that's needed (and it might already be there) is some sort of disclaimer that the client takes responsibility for the content of the messages, and that anything breaking laws / decency etc will be on them. Obviously worded more appropriately than that.