Is that definite that there is no remuneration?
Sorry but when it comes to a position representing members with ownership of millions of pounds worth of Rangers shares I need something better than petty politics. People are judged in the actions now and not what they did 20 years ago, and frankly if what is in the Rev Macquarie’s letter is true (and I see no reason it shouldn’t be) then their position in untenable.
Let me guess,
They are acting for someone else essentially. See my post above.
He’s chummy with the man who still holds the majority shareholding
They will tell you he is merely a ‘working group member’. I’m not sure what working group, who else is on it or how often it meets.
Close but I think you’re forgetting the 4th person in the shadows.
Which is?
Same from me.
I don’t know what happened to the RST. Didn’t we used to have an RSA and an RST? Haven’t we always been divided into camps in some form? Pity really. I hope things like this don’t bring that back.
They’ll never reach the thresholds they are aiming for. Not in this current guise
An example of why fan ownership is, to my mind, impossible.
That would be a frightening situation.
I'll speak for myself. Like me or loath me, you will never find anything anywhere that I have done anything against the Rangers Support, quite the opposite
Feel for Stuart. He is correct in citing my resignation due to the way things were being operated with Laura, joanne and Euan backing each others decisions and actions regardless of whether they were sound or otherwise.
Well once we get an AGM, I would like to get statements from all the Directors that resigned and let the Members decide their fate
Robert, genuine question - have you had personal dealings with the 3 directors in question and if so can you divulge your experience ?
It was always my opinion that it would be a disaster to have a Club 1872 member on the Rangers Board
Fleetingly with the 2 females, totally underwhelmed with their grasp of things
You cannot help but to think this, can you.
As I said earlier I had become disillusioned with C1872 due to there lack of fight for their supporters, we have been slaughtered from every media outlet and lying politicians in Scotland recently. And they have not issued a dickybird about it. After reading the Reverends statement it’s no surprise, they only seem to be interested in themselves. I think I will be cancelling my dues and spending it in other ways that will benefit the Club.
That's as may be, but after I resigned she got moved seat on the pretence that my wife knew somebody that used to sit next to her and that we were talking. Never met the guy, never had an indirect conversation with him but she effectively put this guy in a bad position with no real reason.
This misses the point of getting enough shares to prevent the club being in danger again. Having those shares would be great but it really does look like it could be more of a hindrance than a help in normal times.
Is there a reason for not naming this person just now?
What’s with the riddles here?
To be honest Robert you should be involved in club 1872 no doubt. I know there are lots of folk with an axe to grind with you but in fighting aside you have always taken me as committed to the cause and ready to take action where others talk which is what I think is needed.
If this is who I’m thinking it is, the disgrace is in him having to resign.
