Do you think we can get Gilmour on Loan?

[The Goal Machine]

Reports suggest he is considering going on loan to get more game time.

I know the argument about improving someone else’s player rather than playing one of our own.

However we know the rewards that beckon next season winning the League means automatic qualification and the riches of the Champions League. More than that under Gerrard I think we would be an acceptable club for a loan spell for Chelsea, our League aspirations and our European form over the last three seasons.

I think Gilmour is destined for greatness and it would excite our support to have such a super talent at Ibrox next year. We have used the loan system before with Gerrard and I would be surprised if he was not interested in Gilmour.

Yes or No?

 

[Mview83]

Sadly not. EPL team for him.

 

[SouthLDNBear]

No.

 

[Diego Maradona]

Great vote

 

[dh1963]

He would fit our midfield and our philosophy perfectly.

But I doubt we would get him, there will be other EPL teams desperate to land him for a year.

 

[Kathmandu]

I’m undecided on the matter so decided to vote on the fence.

 

[Battlefield Bear]

Yes.

Or maybe no.

 

[Reynold]

Voted yes or no.

 

[Mark-Penny]

I’ve thought long and hard about it and decided to vote yes or no.

 

[BWO]

Definitely yes or no

 

[legalbeagle]

Sorry, I couldn’t help but vote for both options, I couldn’t choose between them

 

[Virgil Hilts]

Let it go
Let it go
Yes or No

Let it go.

 

[Begbie's Moustache]

Yes and no.

Serious note: yes, for the Champions League. That way, everyone wins. Chelsea isn't going to loan him for the SPFL only.

 

[Wugs]

 

[GranvillusClutterbuckus]

No. Terrific player, but past evidence seems very much to suggest that it takes players about a season to bed down. Kent being the exception.

For the level of drive and desire that Gerrard demands, i think it's going to be difficult to extract that from a loanee in general.

 

[UncleG]

You've made a mess of your poll mate two options of "yes and no"

 

[The Goal Machine]

Admin spare my blushes and take away the Poll.

 

[BlueHaze]

No and No.

 

[Tino_Col]

Why no ‘maybe’ option?


Or ‘yes’ option?


Or ‘no’ option?

 

[Famous RFC]

You can vote yes or no and yes or no. I chose both!

 

[DurhamBear]

Definitely YES!

 

[Hap Hapablap]

Gilmour would slot into our midfield shape and movement perfectly.

Its not beyond the realms of possibility to get him in, especially if we make the CL. The connection is there and we should ask the question for sure.

So its a definite Yes or No from me.

 

[DurhamBear]

Definitely NO!

 

[drumchapelloyal]

Yes and no

 

[longtimedead]

 

[warfieldranger]

'Yes or no' is winning.

 

[¥ungblazebo¥]

Nope.

I think we have an outside chance of getting him with CL football. But we need first team midfielders in before the qualifiers, especially with Kamara suspended.

So barring a horrific injury, or a late sale, I don’t think we’re in the market for a 1st team midfielder by that point in the window.

 

[Weedoddieno6]

Would like to see it but won’t happen

 

[ssblue]

Definitely Maybe

 

[TN8]

OP's fucked it.

 

[giogaddi]

Only way it would even be considered at Chelsea would be if he was guaranteed 6 CL group stage starts, and even then they'd probably rather he went to an EPL side.

 

[Marcellus Wallace]

Would prefer if we don’t have any loanees in the team unless it was an absolutely worldy which is unlikely.

 

[AllyRFC]

Id rather we didnt tbh.

 

[ssblue]

Story I heard was West Ham were wanting him on loan if Rice goes.

Leicester also keen.

Chelsea want it to be a top half EPL team.

 

[The Goal Machine]

Aaaaarrrrggggghhhhhhhh

 

[Reynold]

Would prefer if we don’t have any loanees in the team unless it was an absolutely worldy which is unlikely.

I can't imagine Marcellus Wallace using the phrase 'absolutely worldy'

 

[Canada Loyal]

If we don't lose a playmaker in the middle, then it's yes or no for me

 

[amabluestar]

Going to upset a lot of the people.
Not good enough for us.
















But he could be brilliant for us.

 

[AllanStan]

An EPL player/CL winner who used to be a Rangers youth player. I swear if he wasn't an ex player of us, you 'Da's' wouldn't create these threads constantly. Give it a rest ffs.

 

[dereksmallsloyal]

If it’s a choice between him and a Harroui or Ozcan, it would have to be the permanent signing.

 

[blue diesel]

I went with my heart and went yes/no..
But my head tells me I should have gone yes/ no..
Will probably regret it later on or maybe no

 

[Dhbrother]

Yes

 

[Johnny Yen]

Possibly

 

[Aranoid Pandroid]

David Gilmour maybe.
Plays a mean guitar.

 

[BroomloanWATP]

Yes, no, maybe. I don't know. Can you repeat the question?

[They Might Be Giants intensifies]

 

[LetsGo]

It'd be some upgrade on Zungu. Learning from Davis would do him the world of good too. Perhaps if we are still due some add-ons/fees from Chelsea we could waive them in lieu of a loan fee.

 

[roscow_dynamo]

Not at all
To some extent
Very much so
Don't know

 

[Arkanoid]

Hmmm any option for somewhere in between yes or no

 

[dougiem]

Who?

 

[55 and counting]

People do know Chelsea charge top dollar for loans right? Talking 3 million at least. Part of their business strategy of harvesting youths getting decent loan fees. Gilmour is now quite high profile so you're probably talking more than 3. We ain't paying that sort of £ for a season loan imo.