Souness’ Mullet
Member
This is completely hypothetical so don’t take it too seriously, just curious to see what people think.
I think you’ve not read the question, mate.What about just waiting on his chance, he has the potential but Greegs will be number 1.
Read it again.What about just waiting on his chance, he has the potential but Greegs will be number 1.
Sign somone and tell him and JM the #1 shirt is up for grabs.
Designated starters/backups is a very silly concept on our budget.
I think we needed to, I know it’s the same with any keeper but with McGregor being older he could end up with an injury that sees him have to retire.First choice for me, he is a really good goalkeeper and we are lucky to have such a good number 2
I'm surprised anyone would be surprised by thatHe's a quality keeper. I was surprised he lost his place after his start to the season last year.
I think you’ve not read the question, mate.
Not surprising at all!He's a quality keeper. I was surprised he lost his place after his start to the season last year.
Agree.I was a huge advocate for signing him, and his signing thread was hilarious with the amount of folk who know heehaw.
However, I think he lacks the X-factor to be a proper Rangers number 1. Domestically, he’d be fine and easily the best keeper in the country so no complaints.
My badRead it again.
No excuses i read the first words then missed a bit then the last few and then the answersI think you’ve not read the question, mate.
Absolutely notFor me Jon is more than capable of being our number 1, after McGregor. Then promote Firth and McCrorie to no.2 & no.3.
the manager was proven right then was he notHe's a quality keeper. I was surprised he lost his place after his start to the season last year.
And he is the best in the country at it.Firth as number 2?
He’s here to collect the balls and get the beers for the bus.
We’ll that’s another fine mess you’ve gotten yourself intoMy bad
No excuses i read the first words then missed a bit then the last few and then the answers
I’m surprised you were surprised, to be honest.He's a quality keeper. I was surprised he lost his place after his start to the season last year.
A few weeks later he won the poll as to who should start the season as No.1.I was a huge advocate for signing him, and his signing thread was hilarious with the amount of folk who know heehaw.
However, I think he lacks the X-factor to be a proper Rangers number 1. Domestically, he’d be fine and easily the best keeper in the country so no complaints.
Has potential? He’s 33.What about just waiting on his chance, he has the potential but Greegs will be number 1.