YoungGer97
Well-Known Member
Listen, I didn't like the BLM association the knee had in the beginning. I felt a lot of people involved in football bought into the knee gesture without fully understanding the broader politics behind BLM. I think people supported the message of the blm slogan (as 99% or more of us do, me included), and thought it was just another initiative to combat racism like Show Racism the Red Card etc, but politically fairly neutral. I think a lot then realised the politics of BLM go a lot further than just opposing racist abuse on Twitter or on the street, and that's when some clubs started to back away.
But honestly, as somebody who didn't like it, I think what it represents has changed and become a lot more to do with simply saying that we don't stand for the abuse that Kamara and Roofe received at the hands of Kudela, Slavia, their rat fans, Celt#c fans, Humza Yousaf, and James Dornan. The distance between the gesture and BLM the organisation has grown. I think players have owned the gesture and the message, and they're clearly saying it's about standing against racism, not furthering a broader political agenda.
Completely agree with this too. I still think it’s a pretty empty gesture but I think it’s connection to BLM is absolutely minuscule now, particularly in football, and in this continent more widely.