What formation would you go for and why?
I know they are very similar but also important differences, playing 4231 allows the full backs to get up on the front line but is this something that we should persist with as Tav and Borna age?
In a 4231 midfield to front might look like;
In a 433 it might be;
I love the look of the midfield 3 in the 433 but it would mean that Borna/Tav would need to sit more as we couldn't just leave Raskin himself in case of breaks.
In the scenarios above the attacking threats would be;
4231: Tav, Borna, Cantwell, Tillman, Kent, Morelos
433: Cantwell, Tillman, Sakala, Morelos, Kent.
Would you rather two fullbacks supplying crosses or an extra goal scorer in Sakala?
I know the players will change but put those to focus the chat on formation rather than players.
I know they are very similar but also important differences, playing 4231 allows the full backs to get up on the front line but is this something that we should persist with as Tav and Borna age?
In a 4231 midfield to front might look like;
Raskin Jack
Cantwell Tillman Kent
Morelos
Cantwell Tillman Kent
Morelos
In a 433 it might be;
Raskin
Cantwell Tillman
Sakala Morelos Kent
Cantwell Tillman
Sakala Morelos Kent
I love the look of the midfield 3 in the 433 but it would mean that Borna/Tav would need to sit more as we couldn't just leave Raskin himself in case of breaks.
In the scenarios above the attacking threats would be;
4231: Tav, Borna, Cantwell, Tillman, Kent, Morelos
433: Cantwell, Tillman, Sakala, Morelos, Kent.
Would you rather two fullbacks supplying crosses or an extra goal scorer in Sakala?
I know the players will change but put those to focus the chat on formation rather than players.