Sam English
Well-Known Member
There, their and they're.No.Two others spring to mind:
Advise for Advice and Aloud for Allowed.
There, their and they're.No.Two others spring to mind:
Advise for Advice and Aloud for Allowed.
expected and given his kick - correct
Your at it.There, their and they're.
I'm innocentYour at it.
It's probably the correct decision.
What is fûcking scandalous however is that he's the first and only player to be punished retrospectively this season.
We see assaults on our players go unpunished every other week. We see the likes of Brown boot and elbow people on a weekly basis.
This bias / lack of consistency must be challenged by the club.
There wasn't a hope in hell of it being thrown out.
This proves that they are cheating.
Scott brown was not cited for a kick in the face of a Hamilton player.
The club should take further action
expected and given his kick - correct
An appeal worked for Scott Brown after one of the most blatant red cards ever seen in this country.
It was a red. Let's not make every single negative decision by the refs into an ordeal.
I have no problem calling out the multiple errors they make in games but if we make a fuss over any and every decision then we become as paranoid as they used to be.
We are the only number they have, corrupt shower of mentally challenged bastards.FFS, have they got us on some sort of disciplinary 'speed-dial' ?!
It wasn’t the red card that was the “ negative decision “ it was the fact that he ( a rangers player ) was singled out amidst the rest of the brutality that was on show that day.It was a red. Let's not make every single negative decision by the refs into an ordeal.
I have no problem calling out the multiple errors they make in games but if we make a fuss over any and every decision then we become as paranoid as they used to be.
Would of instead of would have rips meIs ‘loses’ the most commonly misspelled word on this forum?
Neither do i mate but that wasn't really my point.
Yet the person he kicked, also kicked him - so why was Moult not offered a retrospective 2 match ban?