Yet you’re totally ignorant of the effect that starving players of a first team football between the ages of 16-22 can have.
The fact that not many have went on to better things could well be down to us stalling their development at a key stage. It won’t be the case for them all, but you’ve got to consider it.
Not ignorant of anything mate. The only way that a player of any age should get a game for Rangers is if they are good enough to play. We aren't a development club, we are, or at least should be, about winning.
Patterson played games. Gilmour, had he stayed, would have. Going further back, McGregor made it. Charlie Adam made it to EPL level. If you are good enough, you will make it.
Barry McKay played plenty of times. Is he good enough? Greg Wilde? Frazer Aird? Myles Beerman?
Playing games is important for development, no doubt, but the reality is some have it and some don't. And if you have it, there's nothing stopping you making it at Rangers. Since our much maligned academy was built, we've produced guys that have won league titles, guys that have played in European finals, Scotland internationals, guys we have sold for millions and broken our record sale twice. It works fine for the type of club we are.
Bailey Rice is a talented young man but they are ten a penny. Whether he makes it will be down to himself. Same as any of them. Lovelace, Lowry, King, Devine, all talented but that's not all it takes. Look at Kai Kennedy and Josh McPake. The list of players that has proved us wrong in the last 20 odd years must be zero.
If you are good enough, you will make it. The cream always rises to the top.