With reading thread,admittedly not from beginning. I can understand and see you have said this on a few occasions and fully understand that some things cannot be said on a public forum for fear of jeopardise to case. But it is in a way pleasing to see some things coming to light more which can relieve some stress on the people behind the case and lets them talk more about it without repercussions. I just hope that finally it will all come out for all to see and many will see the real storyAgain we apologise that we can’t mention more on this, but I know you’ll understand.
Like someone said before said , it would be like marking your own homework and I cannot see any any jury accepting that as a defence .Absolutely correct.
One company looking into a separate and different company?
Happens all the time.
Not.
I hope this judge doesn't bottle it and bend to the celtic name and reputation on the premise of "missing documents".For those wondering what will happen if the judge refuses the class action, then it would mean the survivors would have to go forward individually.
Even if they did find the bit of paper dating back to the 60’s which says they are separate entities, their actual behaviour over 4 decades demonstrates a clear and practical connection between the two.
In other words, despite what the original constitution might say, the reality is that Celtic were inextricably linked to the boys club and regarded them as their feeder academy. This is abundantly clear from their own club publications and something which Spotlight have highlighted time and time again.
Then we fight on and never surrender.I fear tomorrow will be another dark day for justice in this country.
Please let me be wrong.
Good to hear there are still options available should the judge unfathomably decide to ignore the mountains of evidence that has come from the defendants own publications, not to mention the previous judgement.For those wondering what will happen if the judge refuses the class action, then it would mean the survivors would have to go forward individually.
It seems like their attempt to have the action dismissed is a last throw of the dice here. They're basically admitting they can't prove themselves to be a separate entity which is just baffling considering they've been fairly adamant they are! Were Thompsons expecting that?
About time GI think Unionist Scotland is starting to fight back WD.
Maybe 20 years plus too late, but we’ve seen what the alternative approach has done.
Oh I've a lot of faith that this will succeed, the work done by all of you will see to that, I'm just amazed that their whole claim to be a separate entity is requiring papers that have been 'lost'. If that's all they've got to defend themselves then why are they bothering with a defence at all!Celtic have already lost a civil case Mackania.
The difference is that the first one was only based on McCafferty abuse, who they must have accepted was an employee.
They’re trying the separate entity argument now despite evidence that Torbett & Cairney we’re CFC employees.
It’s Scotland. Let’s not pretend the law matters here.Like someone said before said , it would be like marking your own homework and I cannot see any any jury accepting that as a defence .
Which would essentially drive up the cost to the public tax payer. We have already paid enough by having a justice system that seems to seek to enable institunolised pedophilia. More importantly it would most likely make the ordeal more difficult fo each of the surviour's, I'd imagine it would be easier on your mental health to do this alongside other victims who can can support you and you them.For those wondering what will happen if the judge refuses the class action, then it would mean the survivors would have to go forward individually.
I suspect if a Scottish court refuses to accept a class action, then the lawyers will appeal the decision as far as the UK Supreme Court, where they will almost certainly win.Which would essentially drive up the cost to the public tax payer. We have already paid enough by having a justice system that seems to seek to enable institunolised pedophilia. More importantly it would most likely make the ordeal more difficult fo each of the surviour's, I'd imagine it would be easier on your mental health to do this alongside other victims who can can support you and you them.
Once these basturds are finally served justice I hope that those in the justice system who are culpable of covering their crimes upnis also brought to justice and the laws are changed accordingly to make sure that something like this can never happen again.
Oh I've a lot of faith that this will succeed, the work done by all of you will see to that, I'm just amazed that their whole claim to be a separate entity is requiring papers that have been 'lost'. If that's all they've got to defend themselves then why are they bothering with a defence at all!
Their ‘evidence’ is based on something that doesn’t exist! Desperate stuff.Oh I've a lot of faith that this will succeed, the work done by all of you will see to that, I'm just amazed that their whole claim to be a separate entity is requiring papers that have been 'lost'. If that's all they've got to defend themselves then why are they bothering with a defence at all!
So a wee bit of paper worth several millions of pounds has gone missing? Maybe they saw it when they first peddled that excuse. Maybe someone photocopied it, scanned it or e-mailed it to Dundee?Their ‘evidence’ is based on something that doesn’t exist! Desperate stuff.
Need to get your facts right. The missing productions in the effigy case, if that's what you're referring to, were misplaced by COPFS, not Police Scotland.Lets hope they weren't entrusted to the Evidence Related Property store at Police Scotland, they could be anywhere now.
For those wondering what will happen if the judge refuses the class action, then it would mean the survivors would have to go forward individually.
Even if they did find the bit of paper dating back to the 60’s which says they are separate entities, their actual behaviour over 4 decades demonstrates a clear and practical connection between the two.
In other words, despite what the original constitution might say, the reality is that Celtic were inextricably linked to the boys club and regarded them as their feeder academy. This is abundantly clear from their own club publications and something which Spotlight have highlighted time and time again.
If it is proven that those who ran CBC were employees of CFC then it's an open and closed case.
That's what I'm reading, but I'm thinking "surely to fùck that’s not what you're going to court armed with?".So their defence is that they've got proof that they were indeed a "separate entity" however they've lost it? Am I reading that right?
Luckily it's not the SFA or Holyrood that is running the show as that would be enough evidence to get them off the hook.That's what I'm reading, but I'm thinking "surely to fùck that’s not what you're going to court armed with?".
Fingers crossed that today is the day.
I believe they do , but celtic fc seem to be have their own set of rules who they want to tellIf they are forced to defend ,the fact is a genuine claim against them they are forced to tell the stock exchange are they not ?
A damning indictment of the mindset of the filth support.The lawyer who will face Celtic has asked for anonymity to protect them from the same arson attacks as Big Pete ?
BN94 I’m sure I speak for all the victims and their families when I commend you guys for your effort over the past years.