Gios_Gillet
Well-Known Member
Will that vile club ever receive punishment for what they allowed and turned a blind eye to, make me sick.
He has been contacted more than onceAndrew Neil has the style that would rip them a new arse in 5 seconds flat....exactly the kind of guy who should be questioning them.
He has been contacted more than once
Has BN, Grigo and Spotlight confirmed this?He has been contacted more than once
Has BN, Grigo and Spotlight confirmed this?
I know the guys said some journalists were interested.
Has BN, Grigo and Spotlight confirmed this?
I know the guys said some journalists were interested.
I can confirm it cause I've tried him more than once. I don't think there is anybody that's in this country with any clout that's not been contactedHas BN, Grigo and Spotlight confirmed this?
I know the guys said some journalists were interested.
Has BN, Grigo and Spotlight confirmed this?
I know the guys said some journalists were interested.
So - hand-picked by Stein, 'instrumental' in bringing Burns to Parkhead as manager but that vile club still pretend he was just an independent character. Hell mend them and a curse on their house.The Times
Marc Horne
A former manager of Celtic Boys Club who is accused of abusing teenagers told police he was hired directly by Jock Stein to produce players for the first team, contradicting claims that the two teams were “entirely separate”.
Frank Cairney, 87, is alleged to have committed sexual crimes against three boys between July 1978 and June 1989.
An examination of facts is taking place at Glasgow Sheriff Court after the former coach, from Uddingston, South Lanarkshire, was deemed unfit for trial.
During the hearing, a police video taken after Cairney was arrested on August 14, 2019 was shown.
In it, he told Detective Constable Elaine Wood that he had been installed as head coach of Celtic Boys Club by Stein, then Celtic FC manager, in 1970. Cairney, who denies all charges, said: “[Stein] says ‘You will take the Celtic Boys Club under-16s.
I will put s-forms [schoolboy players] in there and you are responsible’. It was called Celtic Boys Club, but it was Celtic under-16s.”
The Scottish Champions argue that the boys’ club was a separate legal entity and that they are not culpable for abuse that took place there.
More than 20 former players for the feeder club have joined a separate class lawsuit against Celtic FC, which is proceeding at the Court of Session.
The claimants believe they are entitled to compensation from the senior club.
At yesterday’s hearing a 50-year-old man, who cannot be named, said he was abused by Cairney when Celtic Boys Club travelled to Aviemore for a friendly match and stayed in a hotel.
“He asked me to go to his room under the pretence of talking about the game,” he said “I stood up and he stood up and he touched my clothing and put his hand down the front of my clothing.”
He said Cairney then performed a sex act on him: “I was massively shaken, I told him to stop.”
He later recalled that Cairney sometimes drove him home from Barrowfield, the Celtic FC training ground used by the boy’s club. “A couple of times he would reach over and touch my groin area.”
Andrew Crosbie, defending, put it to him that he had never been alone with Cairney in Aviemore. He responded: “That’s a lie.”
Celtic FC has always insisted that the boy’s club was legally distinct. It has said: “Given the ongoing legal proceedings, it is not appropriate for us to provide any comment.”
The hearing, before Sheriff Tom Hughes, continues.
i would suspect that Westminster have plenty skeletons in the cupboard in regards to similar matters,(and probably concerning some very rich and powerfully influential individuals) and so it will be convenient to look the other wayMuch like the recent Westminster intervention to the absolutely ridiculous GRR bill, why oh why can't the UK government step in and recognise the size of this organised crime gang.
The Times
Marc Horne
A former manager of Celtic Boys Club who is accused of abusing teenagers told police he was hired directly by Jock Stein to produce players for the first team, contradicting claims that the two teams were “entirely separate”.
Frank Cairney, 87, is alleged to have committed sexual crimes against three boys between July 1978 and June 1989.
An examination of facts is taking place at Glasgow Sheriff Court after the former coach, from Uddingston, South Lanarkshire, was deemed unfit for trial.
During the hearing, a police video taken after Cairney was arrested on August 14, 2019 was shown.
In it, he told Detective Constable Elaine Wood that he had been installed as head coach of Celtic Boys Club by Stein, then Celtic FC manager, in 1970. Cairney, who denies all charges, said: “[Stein] says ‘You will take the Celtic Boys Club under-16s.
I will put s-forms [schoolboy players] in there and you are responsible’. It was called Celtic Boys Club, but it was Celtic under-16s.”
The Scottish Champions argue that the boys’ club was a separate legal entity and that they are not culpable for abuse that took place there.
More than 20 former players for the feeder club have joined a separate class lawsuit against Celtic FC, which is proceeding at the Court of Session.
The claimants believe they are entitled to compensation from the senior club.
At yesterday’s hearing a 50-year-old man, who cannot be named, said he was abused by Cairney when Celtic Boys Club travelled to Aviemore for a friendly match and stayed in a hotel.
“He asked me to go to his room under the pretence of talking about the game,” he said “I stood up and he stood up and he touched my clothing and put his hand down the front of my clothing.”
He said Cairney then performed a sex act on him: “I was massively shaken, I told him to stop.”
He later recalled that Cairney sometimes drove him home from Barrowfield, the Celtic FC training ground used by the boy’s club. “A couple of times he would reach over and touch my groin area.”
Andrew Crosbie, defending, put it to him that he had never been alone with Cairney in Aviemore. He responded: “That’s a lie.”
Celtic FC has always insisted that the boy’s club was legally distinct. It has said: “Given the ongoing legal proceedings, it is not appropriate for us to provide any comment.”
The hearing, before Sheriff Tom Hughes, continues.
The separate entity defence will be a massive part of their downfall.And Tommy Burns directly recruited Andy Ritchie to run the boys club in 1994.
If it was a "seperate entity" then why the hell are staff from CFC negotiating terms and conditions of employment with a club that has nothing to do with them?
BB
The separate entity defence will be a massive part of their downfall.
Adidas don't care. They still use child labour and sweatshops for their products. All about the money, but will post meaningless quotes on social media in PR exercises.I really do hope Adidas and co are watching this. They can't say weren't warned. And should they continue to provide sponsorship after the many cases against CFC they should hang their heads in shame.
Also that fat cn't and every involved should hang heads in shame.
Oh and anyone to continues to fund/support them should hang heads.
Rod Stuart can f**k off too. Pr**k. Everyone involved and my ex-GF can get f***d too.
Hopefully true and hopefully a big step towards justice for the sufferers and survivorsCairney found guilty just breaking.
Massive step if true, and so much credit to the spotlight team in their persistence in getting to this point.Cairney found guilty just breaking.
Hopefully true and hopefully a big step towards justice for the sufferers and survivors
Asked the same thing in another thread.Mr Allan did not move for sentence after the verdict and asked that the case be “deserted pro loco et tempore” due to the legal provisions of Cairney being unfit for trial.
He added: “This is on the basis of the medical reports before the court.”
Sheriff Hughes granted the motion which was not opposed by Mr Crosbie.
What does this mean?
Yes mate, he is guilty but as unfit (ahem) to stand trial then no jail time as far as I know“deserted pro loco et tempore” - Does this mean Cairney won't receive a sentence for what he did here ?
Unbelievable. Our justice system really is a joke.Yes mate, he is guilty but as unfit (ahem) to stand trial then no jail time as far as I know
Yes mate, he is guilty but as unfit (ahem) to stand trial then no jail time as far as I know
To stop the particular indictment or summary complaint proceeding further without the facts being determined is the translation on googleYes mate, he is guilty but as unfit (ahem) to stand trial then no jail time as far as I know
Yes mate, he is guilty but as unfit (ahem) to stand trial then no jail time as far as I know
I actually think it will strengthen the resolve of the victim/survivors to get justice and highlight what they have faced.They are utter scum for making these people have to stand up and relive these events again but they persist in the separate entity pish and now it appears to be coming back and biting them.
Thats my understanding of it mate on what I have read , I could be wrong thoughSurely it cant mean they won't send him to prison?!
If this man is not sent to jail this will be one massive kick in the face to every victim of his.
So a Sheriff says he is guilty but yet he is unfit to be punished?! Surely not..
Bullshit !!! Let the basturd rot and eventually die in his pish stained prison cell!! Evil rancid kunt!!!
No sentence as this was a ruling to establish fact not a conviction as such due to him being “unable to stand trial”What was his sentence?
That’s just scandalousNo sentence as this was a ruling to establish fact not a conviction as such due to him being “unable to stand trial”
He will not receive any jail time whatsoever
Mr Allan did not move for sentence after the verdict and asked that the case be "deserted pro loco et tempore" due to the legal provisions of Cairney being unfit for trial.That’s just scandalous
Individual fans have no sway when contacting "the football authorities".
However, a group of substantial shareholders in a Club from the same league (I think we know who I mean) should be able to rightfully contact the SFA / SPFL and ask them what punitive actions will be taken against a Club that has engaged in employing numerous child abusers (and re-employing them).
The question should be termed along the lines of:
"We can all agree that there is nothing more important to us than the safety of our children. .....
We have seen another Club actually ejected from the League system apparently on the basis of financial "fiddling".
Since child abuse is far more serious than that, will the SFA/SPFL take action to similarly punish a Club that has quite deliberately emplaced (sometimes known) child abusers into positions where they have attacked and molested children ?
Is Financial Impropriety worse than Child Abuse in the eyes of Scottish Football Authorities ?"
More convenient cases of "dementia" to follow.No sentence as this was a ruling to establish fact not a conviction as such due to him being “unable to stand trial”
He will not receive any jail time whatsoever