Laudrup1
Well-Known Member
I think that you may have misquoted there jf1960?? I dont think Celtic ever claimed to have had the missing documents. I think they are implying that others had the documents which have now gone missing.
Read on a scum site that the documents are the CBC constitution.
These cvnts have hired a top legal team.
They will try everything and anything to try and wriggle of the hook.
As an aside I note that the scum sites seem to now be running with threads on the subject after years of ignoring it.
Apparently they are emboldened by a high court victory by Blackpool fc which overturned an initial court decision (awarding a victim £20000) and deemed the club could not be held vicariously liable for the abuse by their coach/scout at a feeder club. Folk can Google it.
The poor victims legal team had hoped to take the case to the supreme court but cannot find anything about that.
It's funny you mention that. I'm on a forum with a communal football thread for Scottish football and the issue, on the rare occassions it's mentioned, is always either ignored by that lot or scoffed at with "aye, but Neely" responses.
Just the other day, one of the Celtic fans chimed in for the first time ever and mentioned the Blackpool care and started talking about how courts are unsure of how to proceed on vicarious liability.
They're clearly still hoping to wiggle out of it (both the club and their fans)
They've (their fans) got no interest in the victims whatsoever despite generic "we hope they get justice" comments which are empty. They're all really hoping it doesn't cost them dearly and be damned with any sort of justice.