Celtic share price falling

Got my calcs wrong previously.
Say it was the same person.

Sold 88k at £1.40. Total = £123k
Buy 100k at £1.35. = £135k

So they actually bought 12k shares extra and it only cost them £12k.

Could be rubbish, but that’s how these folks make (and lose) money on the stock market.
 
Mawsmaw said:
The 2x67.5k buys today = £135k.
Was it not roughly this value that was sold a few weeks back - can’t see back to the old trades.
Perhaps somebody needing a quick cash injection, but losing a significant number of shares in the process of buying back.
Click to expand...
£123k the other week if memory serves.
 
Baladloyal1872 said:
These trades all seem to be off book. This could mean it is much worse. And they might not be reporting in the order they were actually executed.
Click to expand...

In layman's terms what does off book mean? Or order of execution have to do with it.

Make it as simple as you can
 
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Celtic plc (LON:CCP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
Check out our latest analysis for Celtic
What Is Celtic's Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Celtic had debt of UK£9.66m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from UK£10.8m over a year. However, it does have UK£34.1m in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of UK£24.4m.
A Look At Celtic's Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Celtic had liabilities of UK£44.4m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£16.9m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of UK£34.1m as well as receivables valued at UK£25.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£1.82m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This state of affairs indicates that Celtic's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the UK£153.2m company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Celtic also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Celtic can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
In the last year Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 18%, to UK£83m. We would much prefer see growth.
So How Risky Is Celtic?
Although Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) over the last twelve months, it made a statutory profit of UK£8.7m. So when you consider it has net cash, along with the statutory profit, the stock probably isn't as risky as it might seem, at least in the short term. Until we see some positive EBIT, we're a bit cautious of the stock, not least because of the rather modest revenue growth. For riskier companies like Celtic I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
 
RWL12 said:
In layman's terms what does off book mean? Or order of execution have to do with it.

Make it as simple as you can
Click to expand...

It's a trade that takes place outwith the exchange. The buyer and seller do it directly between themselves.
 
Tucker7 said:
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Celtic plc (LON:CCP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
Check out our latest analysis for Celtic
What Is Celtic's Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Celtic had debt of UK£9.66m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from UK£10.8m over a year. However, it does have UK£34.1m in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of UK£24.4m.
A Look At Celtic's Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Celtic had liabilities of UK£44.4m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£16.9m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of UK£34.1m as well as receivables valued at UK£25.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£1.82m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This state of affairs indicates that Celtic's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the UK£153.2m company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Celtic also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Celtic can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
In the last year Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 18%, to UK£83m. We would much prefer see growth.
So How Risky Is Celtic?
Although Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) over the last twelve months, it made a statutory profit of UK£8.7m. So when you consider it has net cash, along with the statutory profit, the stock probably isn't as risky as it might seem, at least in the short term. Until we see some positive EBIT, we're a bit cautious of the stock, not least because of the rather modest revenue growth. For riskier companies like Celtic I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
Click to expand...

All very good, but if you break it down futher the major negative is the fall 18% for overall income, and if you look at that futher it is all from marketing and sponsorship. Hence the poisoned brand IMO bu thanks for your input.
 
Tucker7 said:
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Celtic plc (LON:CCP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
Check out our latest analysis for Celtic
What Is Celtic's Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Celtic had debt of UK£9.66m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from UK£10.8m over a year. However, it does have UK£34.1m in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of UK£24.4m.
A Look At Celtic's Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Celtic had liabilities of UK£44.4m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£16.9m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of UK£34.1m as well as receivables valued at UK£25.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£1.82m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This state of affairs indicates that Celtic's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the UK£153.2m company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Celtic also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Celtic can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
In the last year Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 18%, to UK£83m. We would much prefer see growth.
So How Risky Is Celtic?
Although Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) over the last twelve months, it made a statutory profit of UK£8.7m. So when you consider it has net cash, along with the statutory profit, the stock probably isn't as risky as it might seem, at least in the short term. Until we see some positive EBIT, we're a bit cautious of the stock, not least because of the rather modest revenue growth. For riskier companies like Celtic I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
Click to expand...
Is this just pertaining to the club itself or all entities (not separate) that are involved? Isn't it 3 they've got to muddy the waters?
 
Tucker7 said:
David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital. When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that Celtic plc (LON:CCP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
Check out our latest analysis for Celtic
What Is Celtic's Debt?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Celtic had debt of UK£9.66m at the end of June 2019, a reduction from UK£10.8m over a year. However, it does have UK£34.1m in cash offsetting this, leading to net cash of UK£24.4m.
A Look At Celtic's Liabilities
The latest balance sheet data shows that Celtic had liabilities of UK£44.4m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£16.9m falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of UK£34.1m as well as receivables valued at UK£25.4m due within 12 months. So its liabilities total UK£1.82m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
This state of affairs indicates that Celtic's balance sheet looks quite solid, as its total liabilities are just about equal to its liquid assets. So while it's hard to imagine that the UK£153.2m company is struggling for cash, we still think it's worth monitoring its balance sheet. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Celtic also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Celtic can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
In the last year Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax, and actually shrunk its revenue by 18%, to UK£83m. We would much prefer see growth.
So How Risky Is Celtic?
Although Celtic had negative earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) over the last twelve months, it made a statutory profit of UK£8.7m. So when you consider it has net cash, along with the statutory profit, the stock probably isn't as risky as it might seem, at least in the short term. Until we see some positive EBIT, we're a bit cautious of the stock, not least because of the rather modest revenue growth. For riskier companies like Celtic I always like to keep an eye on the long term profit and revenue trends. Fortunately, you can click to see our interactive graph of its profit, revenue, and operating cashflow.
If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.
Click to expand...
Those figures don’t include all their “liabilties.”

They also debunk the myth that SEFC are the “cash rich” club that the media are fond of telling us.
 
Dunnybear said:
If only wee Fergus hadn’t bailed them out!

Celtic F.C. - Wikipedia
The Celtic Football Club is a Scottish professional football club based in Glasgow, ... culminating in the Bank of Scotland informing Celtic on 3 March 1994 that it was calling in the receivers ...
Click to expand...
And all they did was bad mouth him calling him a money grabber etc. Fungus McSquint singlehandedly saved that vile club from extinction. Sevco? Pffft
 
Shengus Malengus said:
Those figures don’t include all their “liabilties.”

They also debunk the myth that SEFC are the “cash rich” club that the media are fond of telling us.
Click to expand...


was it 150m cash in the bank that was the latest figure to go unchallenged on radio clyde.

Marketing and Sponsorship down 45%. Their history will punish them. Justice to come.
 
Another article on them
Is Celtic plc's (LON:CCP) ROE Of 11% Impressive?
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Celtic plc (LON:CCP).
Over the last twelve months Celtic has recorded a ROE of 11%. That means that for every £1 worth of shareholders' equity, it generated £0.11 in profit.
See our latest analysis for Celtic
How Do You Calculate ROE?
The formula for ROE is:
Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders' Equity
Or for Celtic:
11% = UK£8.7m ÷ UK£82m (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)
It's easy to understand the 'net profit' part of that equation, but 'shareholders' equity' requires further explanation. It is all earnings retained by the company, plus any capital paid in by shareholders. The easiest way to calculate shareholders' equity is to subtract the company's total liabilities from the total assets.
What Does Return On Equity Mean?
Return on Equity measures a company's profitability against the profit it has kept for the business (plus any capital injections). The 'return' is the yearly profit. A higher profit will lead to a higher ROE. So, all else equal, investors should like a high ROE. Clearly, then, one can use ROE to compare different companies.
Does Celtic Have A Good Return On Equity?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that Celtic has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Entertainment industry (9.5%).
That's not overly surprising. ROE doesn't tell us if the share price is low, but it can inform us to the nature of the business. For those looking for a bargain, other factors may be more important. If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
Celtic's Debt And Its 11% ROE
While Celtic does have some debt, with debt to equity of just 0.12, we wouldn't say debt is excessive. Its very respectable ROE, combined with only modest debt, suggests the business is in good shape. Conservative use of debt to boost returns is usually a good move for shareholders, though it does leave the company more exposed to interest rate rises.
In Summary
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.
 
Last item I found on them
Do Directors Own Celtic plc (LON:CCP) Shares?
If you want to know who really controls Celtic plc (LON:CCP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.
With a market capitalization of UK£152m, Celtic is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it's seems that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about CCP.
View our latest analysis for Celtic
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celtic?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
As you can see, institutional investors own 26% of Celtic. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Celtic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Celtic. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
Insider Ownership Of Celtic
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Celtic plc. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of UK£152m, that means they have UK£84m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public holds a 19% stake in CCP. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Next Steps:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

 
Tucker7 said:
Last item I found on them
Do Directors Own Celtic plc (LON:CCP) Shares?
If you want to know who really controls Celtic plc (LON:CCP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.
With a market capitalization of UK£152m, Celtic is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it's seems that institutions own shares in the company. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner, to discover more about CCP.
View our latest analysis for Celtic
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celtic?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
As you can see, institutional investors own 26% of Celtic. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Celtic, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Celtic. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.
Insider Ownership Of Celtic
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Celtic plc. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. Given it has a market cap of UK£152m, that means they have UK£84m worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
General Public Ownership
The general public holds a 19% stake in CCP. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Next Steps:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

Click to expand...

that article is dated, i would imagine 18 moths old? Their second biggest investor behind dermot is in it for financial return. Their mkt cap is about £30 million less than stated on this article. More importantly said investor bought stock at £1.60 a share, trading today at £1.33

Squeaky bum time.

Their revenue has collapsed in 1 area - "marketing and sponsorship". They are a toxic brand and revenue from champions league etc is no longer a given.

I predict their shares to float around £1.30 a share until court news breaks.
 
Last edited:
Another off book sale of 500 at 133.55 this morning. Between that and the 750 yesterday. Its not alot of money in the grand scheme of things. Surely if there wasnt something going on you would keep hold?

The fact they are off book makes it even stranger
 
look
esson_rfc said:
Hopefully more sell up and it keeps on falling
Click to expand...

looks likely to stabilise around £1.30. 2017/18 price. Them buying players and selling for vast profits are now limited. They have maybe 1 player who could return a tierney/dembele figure.

The media are trying their best. They tried recently to hype ayer as a 10m player (no laughing), they tried it last year with nitcham, rogic, and more recently johnstone. Meanwhile trying to devalue morelos et al.

It no longer working. They dont have a Rogers anymore and Lennon does not improve players. That is a massive we have with our gaffer.
 
Bluenosewrx said:
Interesting no MSM have said anything about it, guaranteed if it was us it would be front page news.
Click to expand...

Hollicom will be working overtime. Look out for news against us to break in tabloids regarding shares to counteract if news breaks regarding their shares.

If we have a genuine unjust, they feed the papers something to counteract poor Celtic. If a bad news story is going to break they work on how to involve others so Celtic is not the pinnacle. They will have done their homework for sure. Our tabloid jounos are useless. They get their news from forums and other media outlets. So lazy they are happy to be drip fed information from Hollicom to sell their news.

Celtic are paying massive amounts for their services, and with lazy journos expect a black out until it no longer possible to withhold.

Remember Hollicom work for Celtic, they protect them, in doing so they will also try to involve our club as leverage.
 
The damage limitation crew have really taken their eye off the ball lately. Too busy reading into hand gestures
 
Vice said:
The damage limitation crew have really taken their eye off the ball lately. Too busy reading into hand gestures
Click to expand...


its pathetic, nearly a month on and hollicom and their puppets in the media have turned the cheating ref story into a hand gesture story.

They must think Scotlands public has the same IQ as Hartson and Sutton.

“Always remember... Rumors are carried by haters, spread by fools, and accepted by idiots.”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Latest posts

Back
Top