That's them telt
There is no shortage of contradictory evidence as to the way Rangers are held to account.
SFA have dug a hole with this one.
FFSWeak as f*ck... yet again.
look Keevins said its a mans game and if you grope someone in the balls then its fair game. I kid you not he said this on air. Not word for word but in reference to the incident.
Me, well I grew up with the knowledge that groping, clutching or grasping another mans genitals without his acknowledgment should see you in court.
If on field incidents can land you in jail then (big dunk) then why can sexual assault go unpunished in a legal sense and why is it labeled a mans game in doing so.
Hugh Keevins has a warped mind.
Did you even read it or was your intention to reply with that regardless?Weak as f*ck... yet again.
Bet your delighted. People couldn’t wait for the statement to say how weak it is. You probably wrote this before reading it.Weak as f*ck... yet again.
Did you even read it or was your intention to reply with that regardless?
Copy/PasteBet your delighted. People couldn’t wait for the statement to say how weak it is. You probably wrote this before reading it.
Glad the club has said something but the ‘we are outraged’ type of statement is not the way to go. It hasn’t worked before.
We have to point out explicitly other types of misbehaviour that were ignored by the SFA - e.g., Brown’s gestures or Griffiths tying scarves to posts.
There is stuff the club could use regarding just who pulls the Compliance Officer’s strings. Just do it, Rangers.
Could be the end for the compliant tim.Glad the club has said something but the ‘we are outraged’ type of statement is not the way to go. It hasn’t worked before.
We have to point out explicitly other types of misbehaviour that were ignored by the SFA - e.g., Brown’s gestures or Griffiths tying scarves to posts.
There is stuff the club could use regarding just who pulls the Compliance Officer’s strings. Just do it, Rangers.
Fully agree, I also believe that we need to get this played out in public, shine a light on the corruption. Put videos of the incidents we use in our rebuttal on the club site, if not there then have them on here.Glad the club has said something but the ‘we are outraged’ type of statement is not the way to go. It hasn’t worked before.
We have to point out explicitly other types of misbehaviour that were ignored by the SFA - e.g., Brown’s gestures or Griffiths tying scarves to posts.
There is stuff the club could use regarding just who pulls the Compliance Officer’s strings. Just do it, Rangers.
At least wait and see what the follow up to this is...Weak as f*ck... yet again.
Eh?I agree Clancy had a poor game but was his performance any worse than James Forrests or Bolingolis? I'd say no and they haven't been scrutinised the same. Whatever we think about officials they are in a no win situation.
Suppose it should be expected in this day and age but f*ck me it's tedious.
Have to disagree mate, it's as strong as we could hope for at this stageWeak as f*ck... yet again.
Weak as f*ck... yet again.
Weak as f*ck... yet again.
Eh?
Clancy hasn’t been scrutinised at all and your living a fantasy if you think he has. When it comes to Rangers Officials are in a NO LOSE situation as far as I can see, constantly making a tit of decisions and NEVER having to explain them or be punished for them.
It’s a different story when they get one wrong against the tims which I’d guess is why they don’t take the piss with them
The whole fall out from our 2-1 win on the 29th of December is getting extremely childish.
The media like to build the Rangers v Celtic games up but then play a major part in the pettiness that follows.
Was Morelos in danger of hurting anyone when he bumped into Brown, dived to try and win a penalty or made a gesture to a crowd of scumbags who were giving him abuse?
Was Ryan Kents gesture really offensive to a crowd who had no doubt been giving him pelters all game?
If you are playing football with your mates and someone hits you in the nuts like Christie did to Morelos, what do you do? Either laugh it off or flatten him at the next 50/50 you have.
I agree Clancy had a poor game but was his performance any worse than James Forrests or Bolingolis? I'd say no and they haven't been scrutinised the same. Whatever we think about officials they are in a no win situation.
An SFA charge 19 days after the game is embarrassing. In reality nothing in the game happened that should have had any follow up action.
Suppose it should be expected in this day and age but f*ck me it's tedious.
Simple.If Clancy had given us a handball goal, awarded us a penalty, failed to send off 3 Rangers players who should have got reds, and red carded a Celtic player in the 95th minute after saying 4 minutes injury time I confidently can say he would have been hounded out of football by now.
No more chances. Stick the boot in now.Good they've acknowledged it but their response to the charges after the weekend needs to be extreme. The SFA need to be left absolutely bricking it.
Rangers are being treated unfairly by the SFA and SPFL on a regular basis. It's so blatant it's unreal. It is whether anyone likes it or not as close as you can get to cheating as you can get. Other clubs are being given an advantage over us because we are being refereed to a different level. Our club is being monitored and attacked to a different level. In combination with the media and other clubs it's quite possibly one of the worst attacks on a football club across the globe. No other club would be treated like this or singled out by their FA. It just wouldn't happen.
For that reason Rangers need to let the SFA know there is legal action coming if they don't sort themselves out.
There’s no point mentioning any of that as we are to the best of my knowledge arguing against Alfie’s third card.Glad the club has said something but the ‘we are outraged’ type of statement is not the way to go. It hasn’t worked before.
We have to point out explicitly other types of misbehaviour that were ignored by the SFA - e.g., Brown’s gestures or Griffiths tying scarves to posts.
There is stuff the club could use regarding just who pulls the Compliance Officer’s strings. Just do it, Rangers.
My thoughts exactly. No surrender everTime to go to war Rangers, no retreat, No Surrender.
Agreed. If this is the sort of statements he producing then SR needs chased.Weak as f*ck... yet again.
That’s what I’m saying mateIf Clancy had given us a handball goal, awarded us a penalty, failed to send off 3 Rangers players who should have got reds, and red carded a Celtic player in the 95th minute after saying 4 minutes injury time I confidently can say he would have been hounded out of football by now.
The statement is fine actually - we'll need to give them time to see what happens next.Some folk won't be happy until Stewart Robertson turns up at Hampden with a chainsaw FFS.
That's a great statement from that club that blatantly calls out double standards.
I’ve had a few goes at Robertson but it’s apparent that he’s not really to blame here. King is the man who refuses to appoint a CEO who will robustly champion the club’s interests on and off the pitch so it’s him we should be targetting. Robertson seems to do his specific job very well plus he just doesn’t have the temperament or the communication skills to do what’s needed.Stewart Robertson exudes weakness.
Some folk won't be happy until Stewart Robertson turns up at Hampden with a chainsaw FFS.
That's a great statement from that club that blatantly calls out double standards.
He’s right.You couldn’t wait to post that, ae?
What are the charges against kent and morelos? The culshaw and Beale one I know and understand but havent read sfas charge against those two players
Weak as f*ck... yet again.
What like the Scottish cup where exactly the same statements were made. Excuse me if I’m a bit jaded by a board that couldn’t defend a player being called a waster and resting bitch face. I judge by actions and we ain’t seen any from this board. Wonder how the file on the bbc is going? Laughable.Wrong.
We've made it clear there's more to come.
That never upset Rangers so no comment. Just Morelos and the rest of us that seems to care about that one.Where the statement regarding the sun and the fat slug that is Leckie?
If you judge by actions and you haven't seen any then how can you judge?What like the Scottish cup where exactly the same statements were made. Excuse me if I’m a bit jaded by a board that couldn’t defend a player being called a waster and resting bitch face. I judge by actions and we ain’t seen any from this board. Wonder how the file on the bbc is going? Laughable.