I think when it comes to keepers it is mainly down to box ticking. Usually the best keepers tick most boxes. In layman’s terms, McGregor’s shot stopping can be world class, but he does lack in other areas, such as distribution and command of his box.
Yeah, I’d be on board with that.
I don't know if controversial covers it but people like you are in a minority and most normal people don't view Rangers in that way.
who ... Laudrup and Boli??
.. that moment you realise your talking to a Rangers Da' !!
So far, you are 0 for 2 on this thread.
Time to do what? Bring in even more dross that he had already? The fact that he chose not to come and watch games whilst McLeish was still in charge was a massive own goal. He could have picked up the likes of Thomson & Brown for the money spent on the likes of Clement & Sionko. And as for Sebo......
Ye canny say that they’re no good enough to play in Europe, Bolis got a European Cup winners medal for %^*& sakes.
look take it easy on me..... I asked the chairman some question last wee annol... dunno how well the went down?
Really? So, with all due respect to them, and I loved these guys, players like Laudrup, Gazza, Boli, and the Italians, etc brought in to hammer St Mirren, Falkirk, Morton and Raith Rovers,?
its almost as if 9 in a row happened all by itself
Aw, Jesus F#ck, we had the money and players to do both. One didn't have to be at the expense of the other, ffs. I expected players of that calibre to be, at the very, very least, capable of giving Grasshopper, Strasbourg and Steau Bucharest a decent game while we were dominating at home for God's Sake...
I’d agree if it wasn’t for that handstand shit he pulled.
cant have it both ways though you were not saying they were brought in for both you said they were brought in for Europe.
A team built with Europe in mind should have won at home as a matter of course.
If you subscribe to the theory that they were only brought in for europe you have a point....but they werent. Like I said 9 in a row didnt happen by itself. They were brought in for both, succeeded in one, "failed" at the other.
I'm 46 and that is pretty much my memory of ferguson as well he had a good first couple of seasons with rangers then after that there were more indifferent performances than anything and he did become a target of the boo boys .
Those players weren't brought solely for domestic success. They were expensively hired to make their mark in Europe at the same time.
What an odd post
What an odd post
they werent brought soley for european success either they were brought in for both.
I have never heard a single rangers fan say that if we kept Le Guen, 2012 wouldnt have happened.
You're now just repeating what I've said ya walloper....
naw you said they were brought in solely for europe.
No, but the Le Guen apologists would love it if someone did. It would vindicate and legitimise Le Guen.
I said they weren't brought in solely for domestic success which means they were brought in for both... Jesus F#ck....
I think you know they are not supposed to do that.
"Rangers have lost to sides in Europe which, as a result, should've seen players sold on because they weren't doing the job they for which they were brought here." .................... this was your words.
No, it's not utter pish.
so you have just made a scenario up entirely in your head.
yup a better argument would be that the club dont want to hear any of those songs sung at the club.
So Le Guen apologists don't exist? In their alternate reality he would've led us to glory so there's be no need for Smith to come back and spend what we didn't have.
