The fact Arfield never went in two footed is obviously completely lost on you.I think that every player goes into a tackle with two feet, the red card was for the studs showing and only one player was doing that.
When you play for the paedophilic harbingers you are always coached.I'd also like to say is CG trying to be controversial, has he been coached, or is he that fooling dumb??
Because we thought we could sign him on a short term deal to replace Simonsen and Robinson.Why the %^*& did we save this wankers career?
Craig Gordon is a piece of filth unworthy of any of our attention.
Clancy wasn't reffing disappointingly for him.Sportscene looking for red cards already
CRAIG GORDON reckons Rangers star Scott Arfield could've been sent off after the crunching tackle with Aberdeen defender Andrew Considine.
The Dons stopper was shown a red card for the lunge but Arfield escaped any punishment at Pittodrie, as Gers ran out 1-0 winners.
And Hearts keeper Gordon claims Arfield jumped into the "meaty challenge" with two feet and could've walked.
Speaking on Sportscene, ex-Celtic keeper Gordon said: "No, I don't think so.
"You look at Arfield jumping in with two feet as well there.
"It was quite a meaty challenge from both players there.
"You look at that and I don't think you can complain about the red card.
"Both players are in serious danger of going for red cards the way they've both went in for that.
"I don't think you have any complaints when you see that back."
The replay showed the ref called it correctly no discussion necessary.Super Ally said the same after the game. He said if he had got to the ball first he would have seen red, as he was also going in with feet off the ground and studs showing.
Not the way I saw it.
It’s the press twisting what he said for headlines read the quote... at no time does he say that. He says it was a meaty challenge (and it was ) but he says looking at it it was the correct decision at no time does he say Arfield should be sent offSportscene looking for red cards already
CRAIG GORDON reckons Rangers star Scott Arfield could've been sent off after the crunching tackle with Aberdeen defender Andrew Considine.
The Dons stopper was shown a red card for the lunge but Arfield escaped any punishment at Pittodrie, as Gers ran out 1-0 winners.
And Hearts keeper Gordon claims Arfield jumped into the "meaty challenge" with two feet and could've walked.
Speaking on Sportscene, ex-Celtic keeper Gordon said: "No, I don't think so.
"You look at Arfield jumping in with two feet as well there.
"It was quite a meaty challenge from both players there.
"You look at that and I don't think you can complain about the red card.
"Both players are in serious danger of going for red cards the way they've both went in for that.
"I don't think you have any complaints when you see that back."
He doesn’t it’s the media twisting wordsWhy does Gordon need to try and get Arfield a ban from the mentally challenged Officer.
Think this is the fairest assessment I’ve seen.Kris Boyd said the same thing.
I agree. Arfields feet were off the ground too (although his lunge wasn't as hefty). But no doubt, if he got there first he'd have walked.
I think there probably was intent from Considine whereas Arfield tried to play the ball.
Anyway. Sportscene has been anti-Rangers pish for years but we're trying too hard with this one.
Kris Boyd said the same thing.
I agree. Arfields feet were off the ground too (although his lunge wasn't as hefty). But no doubt, if he got there first he'd have walked.
I think there probably was intent from Considine whereas Arfield tried to play the ball.
Anyway. Sportscene has been anti-Rangers pish for years but we're trying too hard with this one.
Am gonna go against everyone here and say
if VAR was in use ... Arfield might have been in bother , 100% red for Considine but arfield did go into the tackle with both feet off the floor , anyone who can’t see it is just blue tinted specs and the type of folk we rip the pish out of across the city .. a feared instantly Arfield was gonna go when madden ran over
Am gonna go against everyone here and say
if VAR was in use ... Arfield might have been in bother , 100% red for Considine but arfield did go into the tackle with both feet off the floor , anyone who can’t see it is just blue tinted specs and the type of folk we rip the pish out of across the city .. a feared instantly Arfield was gonna go when madden ran over
This is factually incorrect - I suggest you watch it again and edit your post
I would agree with Ally. My first instinct was that it was a case of ‘who got there first’. It was Considine so he walked - correct decision, but it still doesn’t mean that, on another day, it could have been Arfield. That’s the way I saw it.Super Ally said the same after the game. He said if he had got to the ball first he would have seen red, as he was also going in with feet off the ground and studs showing.
Not the way I saw it.
How many is that now?Isn’t it remarkable how quickly Ex-Celtic players find themselves part of panels in the media?
Did you see the interview with McInnes post match trying to excuse it ? In today's papers he's saying that it is expected that red cards are issued in the first day of the season and goes on to say maybe 10-15 games into the season it's maybe not a red card. FFS We've got Joe Lewis the Aberdeen keeper claiming it was the Rangers bench reaction that got Considine sent off. Lewis then tells us he was a long way from it, aye friggin' almost 100yards !!!
Prick knew exactly what he was doing, then had the cheek to protest at being sent off
I agree, will he be asked his opinion if Hearts are involved ? BBC Scotland trying to polish the turd that is Sportscene by bring in more "pundits".Imo players that are currently playing should not be on any panel. Dont care if different league etc just shouldnt happen. But if he has basically said Madden got it wrong then he's bringing the game into disrepute...get CO on to this