Someone on Twitter or on here I believeSo who added to it?
He responded to sky who JW works for. Do you think King sits listening to talksport all day raging like somebody on here?Quite why our chairman is even entering into any comms with that scumbag Jim whyte is what’s bothering me .
Very concerning .
He sent a 2 paragraph response to sky. The first 2 paragraphs posted in the “statement” thread.Someone is at it here, did Dave King say anything?
He responded to sky who JW works for. Do you think King sits listening to talksport all day raging like somebody on here?
Jim White talks pish,So in two days Jim White has written to Rangers and recieved a reply.Jim White this morning said Dave King had personally written to him, so it wasnt a club statement.
He works for sky. Would you prefer BBC Scotland? The Record? The sun?No , but emailing Jim Whyte ? Fck me . The guy has tried to seriously damage our club now on several occasions . He should be persona non grata for any bear, including and especially our chairman .
He works for sky. Would you prefer BBC Scotland? The Record? The sun?
Is there anybody left people won’t be raging about?
He’ll be the one who contacted him. Does it matter? He never sucked his cock he sent him a 2 paragraph response.I wouldn’t prefer any of them . Is Jim Whyte the only sky employee on the planet ??
He’ll be the one who contacted him. Does it matter? He never sucked his cock he sent him a 2 paragraph response.
What difference does it make? None.Yes it matters .
What difference does it make? None.
Accept what ffs? He gave a 2 paragraph response. What exactly are you accepting??Ach well let’s just accept it then , all is cool eh ?
So, is he going to just let that lie. Continue the dignified silence? In fact, it's not even that anymore - we're sitting their cowering at everything they throw at us. Scared to stand up.
It would be better being “Murdet she wrote” or Midsummer “ then there would be an uproarThis is better than fųcking Poirot.
Edit: I've never fųcked Poirot!
Accept what ffs? He gave a 2 paragraph response. What exactly are you accepting??
Yeah mate thats what I see to, can someone clarify what King did or didn't write please?Might be being a bit thick here,but isn't Kings statement a two paragraph statement on the King statement thread.
He sent a 2 paragraph response. It wasn’t a love letter. It’s it that hard to understand what happens between sport media and football clubs? They’re not going on a date.Our chairman feeing the need to send a personal email to Jim Whyte ! Are you deaf ?
Yeah mate thats what I see to, can someone clarify what King did or didn't write please?
He sent a 2 paragraph response. It wasn’t a love letter. It’s it that hard to understand what happens between sport media and football clubs? They’re not going on a date.
Are you serious? And you wonder how we struggle to get positive PR. Some of our fans are a dream for “haters” absolutely desperate to turn on Rangers or the board. It’s pathetic.To Jim Whyte .
Reprehensible . I’m sorry but that’s the truth , no matter how much we back the chairman .
Are you serious? And you wonder how we struggle to get positive PR. Some of our fans are a dream for “haters” absolutely desperate to turn on Rangers or the board. It’s pathetic.
Are you stupid? We are a football club.What the Fck are you on about ?
WTF is Dave King doing entertaining that clown white.
Quite why our chairman is even entering into any comms with that scumbag Jim whyte is what’s bothering me .
Very concerning .
We struggle to get positive or mate because of the rangers hating Scottish media who seem to be in Celtics back pocket.Are you serious? And you wonder how we struggle to get positive PR. Some of our fans are a dream for “haters” absolutely desperate to turn on Rangers or the board. It’s pathetic.
Are you stupid? We are a football club.
We will talk to sports journalists because we have to get our story out. Being angry at Rangers and the board for being a football club and doing what football clubs do is going to lead to a lot of anger.
The 2 paragraphs in the op of the king statement.
I'm just as confused as you are, In the record it has Kings statement broken down into four paragraphs, but says the exact same in the King statement thread only difference is it's been just reduced to two paragraphs but still says the same thing as the record report.Yeah mate thats what I see to, can someone clarify what King did or didn't write please?
So, is he going to just let that lie. Continue the dignified silence? In fact, it's not even that anymore - we're sitting their cowering at everything they throw at us. Scared to stand up.
So let’s just go ahead and create a BBC Scotland situation with sky now because White works for them?We struggle to get positive or mate because of the rangers hating Scottish media who seem to be in Celtics back pocket.
How about Adrian Durham?He works for sky. Would you prefer BBC Scotland? The Record? The sun?
Is there anybody left people won’t be raging about?
Have you followed what’s happened with BBC Scotland in recent years? Do you think it would be clever to create that situation with sky sports?I don’t put myself down as being particularly stupid, no .
I find it incredible that if our chairman felt the need to send out a statement/apology, he used one of the biggest bellends and anti-Rangers agitators on tv for the past twenty years to do it through .
Bad decision . Don’t have any more to add .
Did he contact him?How about Adrian Durham?
No, I made a mistake.Let what lie?!
I left Scotland this morning for a long weekend, did it rain fucking LSD or something?
If Rangers are to have professional relationships with the media,.we may as well use friendly onesDid he contact him?