David Winnie, Alan Stewart & Charles Stoddart - The 3 man panel

The Friendly Ghost

Active Member
The ex St Mirren player, a director of the Falkirk community trust and a retired sheriff were the three stoogies responsible for the decision to fine Rangers today. Why these members are so keen to remain anonymous or why in this day and age it’s allowed is a different and logical conversation but as Rangers and it’s supporters we deserve the to know.
 
The ex St Mirren player, a director of the Falkirk community trust and a retired sheriff were the three stoogies responsible for the decision to fine Rangers today. Why these members are so keen to remain anonymous or why in this day and age it’s allowed is a different and logical conversation but as Rangers and it’s supporters we deserve the to know.

This will probably disappoint many on who were expecting the panel members to have been John Mason, Angela Haggerty and John Hartson

As night follows day, now their names have been outed, threats will follow(probably from celtic fans posing as Bears) and Rangers fans will be in the papers with negative press.

Did we really need to know their names?
 
This will probably disappoint many on who were expecting the panel members to have been John Mason, Angela Haggerty and John Hartson

As night follows day, now their names have been outed, threats will follow(probably from celtic fans posing as Bears) and Rangers fans will be in the papers with negative press.

Did we really need to know their names?

You're too late bud. We already know what school he went to 45 years ago. :)

How we still dont have our version of Kerryfail, I dont know.
 
This will probably disappoint many on who were expecting the panel members to have been John Mason, Angela Haggerty and John Hartson

As night follows day, now their names have been outed, threats will follow(probably from celtic fans posing as Bears) and Rangers fans will be in the papers with negative press.

Did we really need to know their names?
Why shouldnt we know their names? If SFA want buy in to their systems theu must be transparent.
Id guarantee if boot was on other foot scum would have called for a meeting with ref supervisor by now and pressure well and truely put on refs
 
This will probably disappoint many on who were expecting the panel members to have been John Mason, Angela Haggerty and John Hartson

As night follows day, now their names have been outed, threats will follow(probably from celtic fans posing as Bears) and Rangers fans will be in the papers with negative press.

Did we really need to know their names?

Yes, burn the b@stards
 
This will probably disappoint many on who were expecting the panel members to have been John Mason, Angela Haggerty and John Hartson

As night follows day, now their names have been outed, threats will follow(probably from celtic fans posing as Bears) and Rangers fans will be in the papers with negative press.

Did we really need to know their names?

Aye, who needs fucking transparency, eh?
 
Why shouldnt we know their names? If SFA want buy in to their systems theu must be transparent.
Id guarantee if boot was on other foot scum would have called for a meeting with ref supervisor by now and pressure well and truely put on refs

Aye, who needs fucking transparency, eh?

No matter who is sitting on the panel, they will either be poets or probably poets or traitors.

None of us are going to say - OK well that guy is a decent fair minded bloke - I'll trust his opinion.

We want "fvcking transparency" so we can piss and moan about these guys on our forums - see who can find the biggest link to the filth or their religion any of the panel have?

What ammo is there to be had by us (the fans) knowing these guys names actually give us? The board - yes - they should be aware of who these guys are.

The bottom line is the SFA/SPFL are not fit for purpose and the evidence that they hold us to a different set of rules to the rest is becoming increasingly clear. These three guys are just their pawns.
 
Winnie of St. Peters primary in Glenburn, Paisley.
Of course I don't think that this will have any bearing on the matter.

I knew Winnie quite well when growing up in Glenburn. Great under age player but he was always a bitter 19th Century Terrorist bastard !!

last I heard he was working in sports law
 
No matter who is sitting on the panel, they will either be poets or probably poets or traitors.

None of us are going to say - OK well that guy is a decent fair minded bloke - I'll trust his opinion.

We want "fvcking transparency" so we can piss and moan about these guys on our forums - see who can find the biggest link to the filth or their religion any of the panel have?

What ammo is there to be had by us (the fans) knowing these guys names actually give us? The board - yes - they should be aware of who these guys are.

The bottom line is the SFA/SPFL are not fit for purpose and the evidence that they hold us to a different set of rules to the rest is becoming increasingly clear. These three guys are just their pawns.
Well they should fuckin stand up for theselves instead of being the SFAs bitches, sorry pawns, then.
If there is nothing to hide why all the secrecy behing clised doors?
 
Well they should fuckin stand up for theselves instead of being the SFAs bitches, sorry pawns, then.
If there is nothing to hide why all the secrecy behing clised doors?
Sorry, who.r u saying should be standing up for themselves? These panel members or our board?

What secrecy are you talking about? From our board or the sfa/spfl?
 
This David Winnie?


He was also at Hampden on 6th February - the date of the original kangaroo court.


Follows:
Graham Spiers
Frank McAvennie (Suppose St Mirren team mates)
Jim Delahunt
Hugh McDonald
Hugh Keevins
The SNP
Alex Salmond
John Swinney
Nicola Sturgeon
Celtic
Gordon Waddell


The Celtic and SNP ones really stand out. For fairness, he does NOT follow Rangers. Nor Aberdeen, nor St Mirren.

For being on an SFA panel, he is not even based in Scotland - he is based in London.
 
Alan Stewart was previously Director of "Celtic Media Festival" from 2004-2008. A 62 year old part-time lecturer.




The Sheriff? Must be one of them - he doesn't like water!
 
This David Winnie?


He was also at Hampden on 6th February - the date of the original kangaroo court.


Follows:
Graham Spiers
Frank McAvennie (Suppose St Mirren team mates)
Jim Delahunt
Hugh McDonald
Hugh Keevins
The SNP
Alex Salmond
John Swinney
Nicola Sturgeon
Celtic
Gordon Waddell


The Celtic and SNP ones really stand out. For fairness, he does NOT follow Rangers. Nor Aberdeen, nor St Mirren.

For being on an SFA panel, he is not even based in Scotland - he is based in London.
No room for objectivity in Scotland mate.
 
This David Winnie?


He was also at Hampden on 6th February - the date of the original kangaroo court.


Follows:
Graham Spiers
Frank McAvennie (Suppose St Mirren team mates)
Jim Delahunt
Hugh McDonald
Hugh Keevins
The SNP
Alex Salmond
John Swinney
Nicola Sturgeon
Celtic
Gordon Waddell


The Celtic and SNP ones really stand out. For fairness, he does NOT follow Rangers. Nor Aberdeen, nor St Mirren.

For being on an SFA panel, he is not even based in Scotland - he is based in London.
In fairness,that's a nest of vipers he follows.
 
You're too late bud. We already know what school he went to 45 years ago. :)

How we still dont have our version of Kerryfail, I dont know.

Found out a couple of days ago from a Jambo pal that there is our version of Kerryfail. It's @followmeltdowns on Twitter
 
Sorry, who.r u saying should be standing up for themselves? These panel members or our board?

What secrecy are you talking about? From our board or the sfa/spfl?
The panel should stand up for themselve. You said they were pawns of SFA. Why do their bidding?
The SFA act in secrecy. Why was a player banned for gambling but it was kept secret? Has an other person found guilty of breaking gambling rules been afforded that? Its all very sinister.
If you think thats the right way for the SFA to conduct its business and that the CO role and system is working then you are entitled to that opinion but for me its corruption plain and simple.
 
No matter who is sitting on the panel, they will either be poets or probably poets or traitors.

None of us are going to say - OK well that guy is a decent fair minded bloke - I'll trust his opinion.

We want "fvcking transparency" so we can piss and moan about these guys on our forums - see who can find the biggest link to the filth or their religion any of the panel have?

What ammo is there to be had by us (the fans) knowing these guys names actually give us? The board - yes - they should be aware of who these guys are.

The bottom line is the SFA/SPFL are not fit for purpose and the evidence that they hold us to a different set of rules to the rest is becoming increasingly clear. These three guys are just their pawns.

Mate, you got yourself so outraged you spelt "fucking" wrong.
 
Back
Top