Davie Provan : Rangers would take another liquidation to stop 10 in a row
- Thread starter uneasydaz
- Start date
scottylad72
Well-Known Member
Alrite Dave!
science bear
Member
55 will end provan
Hiram.Abiff
Active Member
Thing is Davie, it’s not really 10 IAR.
The Ranger
Well-Known Member
I wish these tramps would shut up
QueensferryCR3Bear
Well-Known Member
The only liquidation will be across the city when the multi million claims come in
Sam_Seaborn
Well-Known Member
I must’ve missed this one, what’s the story here?
justice1
Well-Known Member
Morally bankrupt.
Another twatter exclusive from an ohbsessed claiming to be in Bury with a local pal who apparently shared this gem of information with him.
Sam_Seaborn
Well-Known Member
What was the point of it? Asking them to set up like other SPFL teams? I’m genuinely lost here.
They are fucking mental.
Captain_Buns
Well-Known Member
It’s amazing that peace process still gets a wage for offering his nonsense views on Scottish football.
He already has .....
big bear carluke
New Member
billyblue7425
Well-Known Member
Yet another scum pundit talking about his favourite subject....... The Rangers. Can you imagine Barry ghost writing stories about the bheggers, naw, nor can I.
wayoutwest
Well-Known Member
Peace Process overstepped his intellectual boundary ages ago, it's a common theme amongst footballers who get their own column, his 'Frank & Fearless' title just shows what a knob he is.
RFC1976
Well-Known Member
Correct mate the story they should be writing about is there massive wage bill that’s not sustainable without CL money but classics mhedia deny and deflect tactics they write made up stories about us and the great unwashed lap it up
Cambuslang Bear
Well-Known Member
Stopped reading at the 'club went bust' bit. Provo is a total cretin who is pandering to the unwashed hordes
WalterLoyal
Well-Known Member
Mike Ashley's no.1 cheer leader spouting more nonsense.
Who exactly has donated money to Rangers?
We have received soft loans from our directors. These soft loans will be converted to shares. This is our directors INVESTING in the club.
They really are desperate to paint a picture of a club with huge debts. I am quite sure they know fine well the club has no bank debt and that every penny of the soft loans will be converted to shares. This they simply refuse to accept though as they attempt to mislead and cause confusion.
Rudolph Hucker
Well-Known Member
Another clueless rhabid twunt.
Davie, just WTF do you know about what the Rangers board or the fans think?
After 2012, no-one involved in any capacity at Rangers (boardroom, backroom, management or fans) would seriously want to jeopardise the long term security of the club for a short term goal, especially one which has more relevance for them than it does for us. After all, we’re not the ones who are obsessed by the other lot.
Yes, we have loans from our directors. Is that worse than having loans from a bank? At least we can ensure that they are paid back in a manner and at a level which is beneficial to the club first and foremost and not to another organisation looking to make a profit. Also, it is obvious that we need an injection of funds over a medium term in order to build up the business to its previous level. Without such loans we would not have been promoted back to the SPL, without them we would not have qualified for Europe, without them we would not have been able to entice our manager to Ibrox and without them we would not be in a position to mount a challenge for the title. All of which generates more cash, increases turnover which will, in the fullness of time, increase the value of the business which will allow the loans to be converted to shares. Everyone wins.
If all goes to plan then we will be fully self sustainable and debt free in a few years. Despite the managerial failures of the previous 2 seasons I think it’s clear to see that we are on track. We own our own stadium which is structurally sound. We now have the ability to sell and profit from merchandise. We will have gate/TV/prize money from the Europa league to come from this season. We have a world famous young manager who can only improve as he gains more experience.
Yet in the SMSM, all of the above seem to be “bad”. Oddly enough, there seems to be no scrutiny over the Scum’s financial well-being. All the focus was on a relitively modest increase in remuneration for a couple of our directors instead of the multi-million £ bonus for one of theirs. We have heard so much about the tens of millions that they have “banked” from the CL over the last 7 years. We also have heard so much about the tens of millions they’ve banked from transfers. If this is true, then where is all this money? Why have they spent so little on their squad, particularly since it is obvious it is serious need of substantial investment. Surely if they had this money they would have spent it at some point over the last 2 transfer windows? What about their stadium which is now at the end of its life? The only sensible conclusion to be drawn is that this pot of gold simply does not exist. And of course, that then begs the question “where has it all gone?”
Still, the longer the SMSM keep sweeping all of this under the carpet (along with the much more serious historical criminal acts which occurred at the scumdome), the better for us as it means Liewell and his cronies will continue to steer their ship on to the financial rocks.
Davie, just WTF do you know about what the Rangers board or the fans think?
After 2012, no-one involved in any capacity at Rangers (boardroom, backroom, management or fans) would seriously want to jeopardise the long term security of the club for a short term goal, especially one which has more relevance for them than it does for us. After all, we’re not the ones who are obsessed by the other lot.
Yes, we have loans from our directors. Is that worse than having loans from a bank? At least we can ensure that they are paid back in a manner and at a level which is beneficial to the club first and foremost and not to another organisation looking to make a profit. Also, it is obvious that we need an injection of funds over a medium term in order to build up the business to its previous level. Without such loans we would not have been promoted back to the SPL, without them we would not have qualified for Europe, without them we would not have been able to entice our manager to Ibrox and without them we would not be in a position to mount a challenge for the title. All of which generates more cash, increases turnover which will, in the fullness of time, increase the value of the business which will allow the loans to be converted to shares. Everyone wins.
If all goes to plan then we will be fully self sustainable and debt free in a few years. Despite the managerial failures of the previous 2 seasons I think it’s clear to see that we are on track. We own our own stadium which is structurally sound. We now have the ability to sell and profit from merchandise. We will have gate/TV/prize money from the Europa league to come from this season. We have a world famous young manager who can only improve as he gains more experience.
Yet in the SMSM, all of the above seem to be “bad”. Oddly enough, there seems to be no scrutiny over the Scum’s financial well-being. All the focus was on a relitively modest increase in remuneration for a couple of our directors instead of the multi-million £ bonus for one of theirs. We have heard so much about the tens of millions that they have “banked” from the CL over the last 7 years. We also have heard so much about the tens of millions they’ve banked from transfers. If this is true, then where is all this money? Why have they spent so little on their squad, particularly since it is obvious it is serious need of substantial investment. Surely if they had this money they would have spent it at some point over the last 2 transfer windows? What about their stadium which is now at the end of its life? The only sensible conclusion to be drawn is that this pot of gold simply does not exist. And of course, that then begs the question “where has it all gone?”
Still, the longer the SMSM keep sweeping all of this under the carpet (along with the much more serious historical criminal acts which occurred at the scumdome), the better for us as it means Liewell and his cronies will continue to steer their ship on to the financial rocks.
Alex Venters
Well-Known Member
Which says more about their mindset than anything else.
A club built out of bigotry, a club rancid to its very core.
Alex Venters
Well-Known Member
He doesn't believe what he's written,he doesn't have to, the mindless readers will do all the believing necessary to create the sought after narrative.
He and others are working to an agenda.
DEJA BLUE
Well-Known Member
But getting a good wage for doing so, a disgraceful slight on our club, and he should be warned for it at the very least
Southside_shug
Well-Known Member
Shaky Davie at it again.
Phuck Off Ya Orange Bastard, as they used to say to you in the Sellik dressing room
Phuck Off Ya Orange Bastard, as they used to say to you in the Sellik dressing room
bpfurian
Well-Known Member
Yes your probably right mate but the Scottish msm is full of clowns like provan who scribble pish for a living.
All of them should be taken to task by the club's legal team but dignified silence is the route the club endorses, and look how that's panning out.
bilkobear
Well-Known Member
Davie was nine years at the Jimmy Savile Dome.
I believe during that time several paedophiles passed through the club and many young people were sexually abused.
Billy McNeill would later say this abuse was an open secret.
The reason that this secret was kept, was that those who were privy to it, put their club before the welfare of innocent children.
One has to hope that Davie Provan who became a journalist was never party to that secret.
One would also expect him as a journalist close to events to have an opinion on such a scandal being operated under his very nose.
Or does the silence regarding this issue carry on beyond the playing days and the direct involvement with the club?
If that were the case then morally there seems to be questions about the integrity of any journalist taking such a stance.
One might think.
I believe during that time several paedophiles passed through the club and many young people were sexually abused.
Billy McNeill would later say this abuse was an open secret.
The reason that this secret was kept, was that those who were privy to it, put their club before the welfare of innocent children.
One has to hope that Davie Provan who became a journalist was never party to that secret.
One would also expect him as a journalist close to events to have an opinion on such a scandal being operated under his very nose.
Or does the silence regarding this issue carry on beyond the playing days and the direct involvement with the club?
If that were the case then morally there seems to be questions about the integrity of any journalist taking such a stance.
One might think.
Fingers1872
Well-Known Member
I'd take a kick in the baws to nut provan
