MelbourneBear
Well-Known Member
I could have this wrong but I think the spin they are putting on it is that by having reconstruction you can implement the reduced number of games they are talking about. Without reconstruction they are saying it's a standard 36 game season and they're threatening punishment if clubs could not play all these games.
Why the two are hand in hand and why the SPFL is once again threatening clubs to vote their way or else is what needs answered.
This is the crux. Why is the SPFL starting with threats? Why are they not saying - as in so many other cases - that these are extraordinary circumstances and we would never hurt our member teams, the teams we are here to represent???