I knowWe never appealed Alfie’s
Not if it is violent conduct.I thought you could only be suspended for the same competition...
Would he have been suspended for the cup ?
I know he's a fud but what exactly is he laughing at? Presumably the whole process, in which case why isn't he campaigning for it to be changed?Tom English is taking it well...
None of that happens, this is what happens, Rangers beat the diddlers, Sportcene decide what punishment is applicable for said crime, claire agrees, bingo, ban for Rangers player.
Rangers produce evidence that one of their players did the same or worse, but they can't have him missing the cup final, so grudgingly recind Rangers ban but will get them next time.
This is it. I personally think Flanagan should have seen red but you can’t do that and not do their guy as well, I’m pretty sure our lawyers pointed out their breathtaking hypocrisy and after that there could only be 1 outcomeBoth incidents could have been red for me, but because of trial by sportscene we end up in the doc again.
Then the compliant officer gets her arse handed to her after trying to corrupt the result.
If Flanagan gets done, then so does simunovic.
End of conversation.
“Corruption” doesn’t even cover it.
Both incidents could have been red for me, but because of trial by sportscene we end up in the doc again.
Then the compliant officer gets her arse handed to her after trying to corrupt the result.
If Flanagan gets done, then so does simunovic.
End of conversation.
“Corruption” doesn’t even cover it.
Get well soon Hugh Keevins
it wasn't an elbow
it wasn't in the reptiles face
it wasn't excessive force
no case to answer
finally a correct decision (although actually referring it is a nonsense)
This.Send him on holiday for a laugh
No way, what a thing to say, those poor celts now that the Gers are here. Unbelievable that this bitter git gets the platform that he does without being challenged.First caller on RC phone-in "John from Coatbridge" states that it proves the SFA is corrupt and biased towards Rangers, immediately told to watch his comments. Keevins started the programme by claiming that the atmosphere has became "febrile" since Rangers return to the top flight, so it's all OUR fault!
That's what should happen we all know it won't thoughThey should now cite Brown for simulation and offer him a two match ban.
1. Don't talk shite.1. He should've been sent off at the time.
2. It should never have been looked at by the compliance officer since the referee had already dealt with it.
3. %^*& them .
Since when was your forearm your elbow?Agreed. It’s utterly shambolic.
Flanagan does elbow Brown, so if retrospective punishment via video evidence is allowed, we have to agree that the decision to ban him is actually the correct one.
That was never the grievance for me, it was the inconsistency that ignored the similar offence by Simunovic.
That they’ve since decided they got the Flanagan decision wrong actually makes them look even more indecisive and clueless.
Time to scrap this charade.
She referred it. 3 clowns agreed with her that it was a red card.Just proves how corrupt/clueless the compliance officer is
Since when was your forearm your elbow?
Good, %^*& him.Spew Keevins on SSB isn’t happy,
Judiciary committee shat it as they would have to ban Simunovicchhhh from the SC finalReferee correct
Referring person/club/TV show wrong
Compliance Officer wrong
Independent panel wrong
Judiciary committee correct
Spidey senses think she has nothing to do with it. Told exactly what is and what is not referrable!She referred it. 3 clowns agreed with her that it was a red card.
Shame more like it, we should take these scumbags on at every opportunity.