Indeed I did see him tonight and he had a nightmare. He has also had a couple of excellent games and a few ok/indifferent games. I think he is prone to rash challenges especially on players, on or near the touchline with their back to goal. I also saw Wallace in a lot of games. He simply cannot tackle. He sticks a foot out and and the opponent goes past him. That is not tackling. I really have no idea if he is currently better than Flanagan. What I do know is that neither does anyone else on here. I respect those who think he should be played ahead of Flanagan. Where I take issue is those who tell us with absolute certainty that Wallace would be better, or Halliday would be better. If either had played and we had lost this board would be swamped, SWAMPED, with people telling us Flanagan should have played.