I don't think Goldson is particularly slow - he's not Boumsong or Bougherra - but he's hardly Davie Weir.
Whilst Weir lacked pace, he had many great attributes; experience, excellent positional sense, read the game well, aerial presence, could break up play, tackle and knew when to step out of defence.
Exactly the attributes both Goldson and Helander posses (not saying they are better or worse than Weir). Both read the game well, both are commanding, both are comfortable with the ball at their feet. They can distribute the ball whether it's long or short, they can organise a defence and are strong in the challenge along with being a physical match for any one. For a player who many have concerns of being too slow, Helander sure manages to read the danger, step out of defence and stop play in wider areas.
Honest question. How often are either beat for pace?
Helander looked like he was beat for pace first half at the Tony Macaroni Stadium yet he still remained composed, got back into a position and stuck out last ditch leg which timed the challenge to perfection. He's great at that.
Both have been up against better sides than the bheggars and dealt with them.
Tavernier - Goldson - Helander - Barišić
Other than individual errors that has been a solid back four with good understanding, reading of the game, composure and balance. It's barely conceded a goal. It's been our rock over Feyenoord, Porto home and away, Livingston, Ross County and in a cup semi final.
Players with ability deal with a lack of pace. Absolutely no concerns over Helander or Goldson against any one.