If Butland was to go, any thoughts on a replacement?
- Thread starter Greggy83
- Start date
We'll get more than that from someone down south.
He's still got years left in him as top goalkeeper.
He's an English premier League keeper.
He's still got years left in him as top goalkeeper.
He's an English premier League keeper.
Shawlands_Bluenose
Well-Known Member
I would sell for that price
Coffee Talk
Well-Known Member
I would be looking for £15 mil minimum.
It needs to be a fee that wee can replace him and buy another 2 positions or so
It needs to be a fee that wee can replace him and buy another 2 positions or so
ChildOfGoth
Well-Known Member
No we can get a bigger fee
Yes we should. I'd hate to see him go but we need to start selling players at their peak value or there abouts.
We can't keep making the same mistakes and letting players leave for free.
We can't keep making the same mistakes and letting players leave for free.
I think 12-15 is realistic given his contract length and age (getting on a bit but still likely capable of another few years in the EPL).
Westcoaster
Well-Known Member
Reckon we'll get significantly more than that.
10 would be too low, imo. 15 would be more like it.
Jim Prideaux
Well-Known Member
We rejected more in January.
Ultimately, we don’t need a Jack Butland to win the league and a good fee would go a long way. However, I’d be wanting more than £10m. Think it’s one of those where he’s more valuable to us, than what he’s actually worth to other teams.
If it was take or leave it, then I’d probably take it.
Ultimately, we don’t need a Jack Butland to win the league and a good fee would go a long way. However, I’d be wanting more than £10m. Think it’s one of those where he’s more valuable to us, than what he’s actually worth to other teams.
If it was take or leave it, then I’d probably take it.
Shengus Malengus
Well-Known Member
Yes, but only if we used it to recruit.
Voted No, but only because I'd expect significantly more for him. We need to sell unfortunately.
Loud and proud
Well-Known Member
No, he is worth more to us than that.
SouthsideTrueBlue
Well-Known Member
10 million ha! Double and that's it.
I believe in Eli
Well-Known Member
He's a stating quality English premier league goalkeeper. We should be looking for £20m.
HandsomeHead
Well-Known Member
No.
Alfie shhh!
Well-Known Member
Closer to 20 million would be a no brainer.
Would have been nice to have had him in the Champions League for us but I doubt he'd want to waste another year here.
At the same time, this time last year he was wasting away on the Man Utd bench so who knows.
Would have been nice to have had him in the Champions League for us but I doubt he'd want to waste another year here.
At the same time, this time last year he was wasting away on the Man Utd bench so who knows.
No Hiding Place
Well-Known Member
Our board would take a bag of magic beans for him,invest the beanstalk money wisely and who knows what would happen.
wilso10
Well-Known Member
Disagree.
Jack Butland is exactly the guy we should be planning a rebuild around.
Title winning Rangers sides over the past 20-30 years have included goalkeepers on a level as good as, if not better, than Butland.
Losing Butland and going for a replacement could set us back.
But of course, money talks.
Rangers fans will never willingly accept a player trading model.
They will always think that selling good players is a sign of capitulation and that not selling our shite players for big money to compensate is a sign of failure and not matching the mentally challengeds.
The minute we hit £8m-10m profit on any player should be the signal to sell. People won’t accept this though.
Hence why we didn’t sign Morelos for £16m because the board thought people would think they were weak because they’d already mentioned 20.
They will always think that selling good players is a sign of capitulation and that not selling our shite players for big money to compensate is a sign of failure and not matching the mentally challengeds.
The minute we hit £8m-10m profit on any player should be the signal to sell. People won’t accept this though.
Hence why we didn’t sign Morelos for £16m because the board thought people would think they were weak because they’d already mentioned 20.
Battle Fever's On
Well-Known Member
The OP was on the other thread where the OP of that thread says he was connected family wise to Butland and the fee was 21 million. He was heavily disputing that fee.
Now starts this one?
Now starts this one?
I think he’s overrated. Seriously.
Ally’s Golden Boot
Well-Known Member
Absolutely no chance.
Forfarbear77
Well-Known Member
Receiving anything over 10 million will help fund the rebuild. Think McCrorie could be an able substitute
£20 million would put him just outside the top 10 most expensive goalkeepers in history. He's playing in the SPL, that's absolute dreaming. Especially when he's played in the EPL for years, his age and we got him for free a year ago
There's absolutely no chance we would get offered £20 million. Realistically £10 million would be a massive offer
The Royal Standard
Well-Known Member
Wasn’t there a relation of his telling all on here during the week he was away for 21m down south and deal done .
Or was that usual pish ? Can’t remember the poster
Or was that usual pish ? Can’t remember the poster
wilso10
Well-Known Member
I dread to think how this season would have ended without Butland.
Ta Phyra Loyal
Well-Known Member
I believe the poster that said we're getting £21m for him.
I think if we were truly offended £16 million for Moreles he would have been sold in a heartbeat
As much as we love our players, if we want to be sustainable and buy players, we are going to have to sell. I'm torn over Butlins tho as he's someone we can build a spine with
Playing in the SL is a hinderence thigh, the scum sold Van Dijk and Frimpong for £24 million combined. A couple of years later the were valued at nearly over £120 million
The league we play in dictates the value, just like Sweden, Denmark and even Holland to a certain extent
Last edited:
