Joe Worrall

Sign Joe Worrall permanently?

  • Yes

    Votes: 192 45.7%
  • No

    Votes: 228 54.3%

  • Total voters
    420

dh1963

Well-Known Member
#8
They turned down a huge bid for him, and now the manager who wouldn't play him has left the club.
I suspect he will be in the Forest first team at the start of next season.
 

MearnsUnionist

Well-Known Member
#13
I think it's unlikely we could get him, but it's a yes if we could.

He's just a kid, but has great maturity and is improving with every game.

2nd only to Rossiter in the fitness stakes at the training camp too.

Tremendous athlete with a great attitude.
 
#15
He’s starting to prove me wrong, I’ve been a harsh critic of him, not quite sure whether I’d like to see him on a permanent basis though (yet).
 

Flash81

Well-Known Member
#16
He played really well v the filth,but I don’t think we need him on a permanent basis,Goldson Katic Macauley and I’d keep an eye on the Bear Halkett at Livi,if he keeps developing aswell has he has been,I think he’d be a useful back up at centre half
 

final_straws

Well-Known Member
#20
It's a no from me. He is just far too poor on the ball & gets caught out of position on the counter.

Just because he was excellent vs them & good vs hibs hasn't made me forget his performances against teams who sit back.
 
Last edited:

KGR98

Well-Known Member
#28
If we could afford him then hes a good centre back however he has his heart set on getting back into the forest team and we couldnt afford him anyway
 

Queens_11

Well-Known Member
#36
He played really well v the filth,but I don’t think we need him on a permanent basis,Goldson Katic Macauley and I’d keep an eye on the Bear Halkett at Livi,if he keeps developing aswell has he has been,I think he’d be a useful back up at centre half
Agreed. Hoping katic reclaims his starting spot soon therefore halkett would be backup although we’ll also need to replace Macauley
 

R-M

Well-Known Member
#40
I’ve warmed to him massively recently. Was always good I’n Europe but looked weak in the SPL but two solid displays against Hibs and Celtic have been very encouraging.

If keeps it up he could be worth going for, but at what cost?
 

Necro

Well-Known Member
#41
Katic is the better player and it's puzzling that he gets in ahead of him so often.

That's my biggest complaint about this management team, we're stunting the development of one of our most promising players to accommodate someone else's player that can barely even pass a ball.
 

the bridge

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
#48
Would take him but it really is mental money down there. If Worral is worth 10million plus then what is Goldson worth?
Goldson is now worth what we paid for him, at 26 he’ll probably be with us for good and thank god. Worral is 22 and he is a very good CB.
 

Latest posts

Top