And your point is?
Not everyone is on here 24/7
This is my understanding.I think there might be some David Murray hijinx at play on this one.
We don't sign Hartson on medical grounds for knee issues, but sign a player the same day who arguably had worse knees.
Still class Ronald de Boer 2002/03 as the best individual performance ever. Barry got all the awards, but de Boer deserved them.
KhantBit of a controversial one this, as I was really excited when I heard we were signing him. He was a big beast (now now) of a player and I reckon that if it had happened it would have been an excellent signing.
Obviously it didn’t happen and he ended up signing for that mob and is an absolute cock of a guy.
How different it could have been.
What’s your thoughts on him nearly being one of us?
This.He was desperate to sign. Evidently still gutted he got a KB.
He'd have run riot for us. Totally opposite of who we ended up getting at double the price.
We were linked with Darko Kovacevic, Emile Mpenza, Raul Tamudo and as you've said, Diego Tristan around this time. Before settling on FloOne more on the Hartson issue.
If we really wanted that type of player, but Hartson simply failed the medical, why did we not try for similar before or after the failure.
None of the other players we were linked with during that time were similar.
I can’t remember who I’m thinking of here but I’ve been thinking this for over twenty years now.
Maybe Tristan
That was the main one I was thinking of, and couldn’t remember!We were linked with Darko Kovacevic, Emile Mpenza, Raul Tamudo and as you've said, Diego Tristan around this time. Before settling on Flo
Edit. Think Serghi Rebrov too
Not sure there are any metrics that’d make Flo look like a good signing.Flo was utter mince in Europe and against them, regularly dropped for big games before being sold at a 50% loss. He scored one in Old Firm games. Not sure how that compares to Hartson's hit rate.
Not sure we can spin this as a wise transfer choice tbh.
Aye, think he was at EspanyolThat was the main one I was thinking of, and couldn’t remember!
Flo was a bad signing for the money, but the choice wasn't merely Flo or Hartson. There was better value out there but murray seemed to be desperate to break the £10m barrier.Flo was utter mince in Europe and against them, regularly dropped for big games before being sold at a 50% loss. He scored one in Old Firm games. Not sure how that compares to Hartson's hit rate.
Not sure we can spin this as a wise transfer choice tbh.
I think you are rewriting history and quite badly-38 goals in 53 games? What big games was he regularly dropped for?
Flo's biggest problem was the fee... a section of the support have still never got over it-if he had came in when Advocaat's team was free flowing it could easily have been very different but as it was he arrived when we were on the back foot and injuries were incredible-he never played in that era's best set up.
I'll repeat again if we had have bought Hartson at the time we could have-he was constantly breaking down after his bad injury and played 12 games all season.
Flo was our top scorer all the time he was at the club.
When you consider our history of signings from the Murray era to now -what is actually one of the daftest takes is that Flo was some kind of uber flop he wasn’t.He ended up benched for the biggest games - the games we paid 12 million for him to play him.
It was a ridiculous, ill-thought out signing. "Flo was actually alright" is one of the daftest takes on here.
Goals?Not sure there are any metrics that’d make Flo look like a good signing.
Met the big lad at the “Moat House” after our league clincher in 99.Flo was a bad signing for the money, but the choice wasn't merely Flo or Hartson. There was better value out there but murray seemed to be desperate to break the £10m barrier.
At this time, I always thought Van Hooijdonk would've been a good fit, previous allegiances aside.
No, not for me.Goals?
Raul Tamudo, bud.One more on the Hartson issue.
If we really wanted that type of player, but Hartson simply failed the medical, why did we not try for similar before or after the failure.
None of the other players we were linked with during that time were similar.
I can’t remember who I’m thinking of here but I’ve been thinking this for over twenty years now.
Maybe Tristan
If we’d signed him and got it wrong?25 years ago we didn't sign him because an MRI scan showed his knees were in very bad condition.
In recent years we have signed loads of players with terrible injury histories prior to joining us, we've wasted huge sums on the wages of crocks.
If 25 years ago we were so strict about Hatson's MRI scans where did it go wrong in recent years when we seem to sign any crock regardless of bad their injury history.
When you consider our history of signings from the Murray era to now -what is actually one of the daftest takes is that Flo was some kind of uber flop he wasn’t.
He was our top goal scorer all the time he was here and he arrived just as the wheels were coming off the Advocaat era.
I asked for the big games he regularly missed and was quoted three yes not ideal but maybe he was alright
When you consider our history of signings from the Murray era to now -what is actually one of the daftest takes is that Flo was some kind of uber flop he wasn’t.
He was our top goal scorer all the time he was here and he arrived just as the wheels were coming off the Advocaat era.
I asked for the big games he regularly missed and was quoted three yes not ideal but maybe he was alright
He scored goals, Taz.Goals?
He did alright for them but an absolute knob jockey.Bit of a controversial one this, as I was really excited when I heard we were signing him. He was a big beast (now now) of a player and I reckon that if it had happened it would have been an excellent signing.
Obviously it didn’t happen and he ended up signing for that mob and is an absolute cock of a guy.
How different it could have been.
What’s your thoughts on him nearly being one of us?
I was about to post the same. Apparentley he downed a few glasses of wine, on the flight up, and it instantly showed up during his medical.Was their not a story probably rubbish. But there was something going around that he turned up an absolute mess, possibly steaming. And we blew it off and called it a failed medical to do him a favour.
That was the story, I think most fans were excited at the time and he was a decent goal scorer.
As Jim Bowen once said " Here's what you could have won"
We were in for Hartson end of August 2000, signed Flo November 2000. That's why, we were after a striker and ended up with Flo.Why are posters comparing Flo & Hartfud, they were bought nearly a year apart.
Nothing they've done since would convince me that we should have signed Hartson.
An absolute cock of a man that I've had the misfortune to meet and I don't know a single person who would suffer him if it wasn't for his illness.
Speak to any of his ex teammates and family.........
Total arse
I can remember the chat of him being absolutely reeking of the swally. Quite sure there was talk he was given free rein the night before on Rangers tab wherever he was staying and ended up getting rubber. Could be bullshit obviously but it was definitely getting spoke about at the time or just after.With medicals and fitness tests, it's a matter of judgement and a risk assessment rather than a binary pass and fail.
The upside of RdB was far greater than the upside of Hartson.
I seem to remember someone say he rocked up at Ibrox for his medical in his Wales tracksuit and reeking of booze?
Anyway, he's a fat prick and I'm glad he never got to wear our jersey. A thug who kicked a teammate in the head FFS.
Tamudo knocked us back im sure. One of those players who didn’t want to leave his home basicallyHe played 35 games the season we were going to sign him. He played 42 the following season for that lot.
I'm sure both him and Tamudo scored in the first games back for their clubs after we knocked them back
He was a very good player for them. O'Neill had Advocaat's team sussed and he recruited a big physical group of players for that task. Alex McLeish recognised that when he became our manager and addressed the physicality imbalance.
Tamudo knocked us back im sure. One of those players who didn’t want to leave his home basically
Why was he failing medicals ? Was it his knees or just his fitness?
You can’t do anything about a lack of intelligence.If he had signed for us , he would have turned out a totally different person, the poets corrupt decent people
He Wasn't getting kicked off the parkWas it correct that he failed the medical? I know we’d had our fingers burned with a few injury prone players shortly before, but I don’t recall him being injured that much when he played with the filth.