Loads of ideas about reconstruction etc, but The fact is there’s very little competition and the league is boring. 10/12//24 teams doesn’t matter, where 90% of matches are teams trying to get lucky hitting on the break. The problem is the quality of the product being served up. Nobody is interested in watching matches outside old firm games unless they are a fan.
So the question for me is not how to rearrange the league, but how to improve the product? Amalgamate smaller teams to pull their finances and play as ‘regions’ seems a good idea in theory, but fans don’t stand for it.
Perhaps the key is in youth development. The SFA itself takes over youth development nationally up to a certain age (no laughing, I know their current set up is shite, but with proper investment in top class coaching and facilities/academies that could change). Similar to the nba draft, the lowest spl clubs get first pick of players each summer. They can then use those players, or even sell them if one is an absolute superstar with 80 to them 20 reinvested in academy. If one player is an absolute star leaving early (such as a Gilmour situation), the lowest spl club gets 80% of the fee. It would take a lot of refining as an idea… but we badly need more competition to make our league attractive. If it worked, we could take on youth development and start academies in other countries such as India where football isn’t historically a priority to feee into the system.
I agree this doesn’t directly benefit us, and I don’t know where independent youth teams would actually factor in. But we need to do something new.