That’s fucking embarrassing for the fucking liar.Whatever Madden, you useless twat -
To be fair I think his hair might be in his eyes
If he is lying he shouldn’t be referring.If he didn't see that then he shouldn't be refereeing.
Precisely. Should have gone to Specsavers?He was staring right at it.
Correct, and in the same way Colum was astounded to hear the SFA announce he saw the Candeias and Ferdinand incident.That would literally make it a conspiracy.
He's a gutless b@stard.Whatever Madden, you useless twat -
He would be if it had been a St Pats player he was lying about.We would do well to remember this is an internet rumour.
If more than a rumour he's finished.
Genuine question. I assume the club have access to photos such as this. Why are we not walking into these appeals with video, photos anything which proves they are liars and calling them out directly.Whatever Madden, you useless twat -
Madden is being made to look:
1) completely useless
2) a liar.
He surely can’t be happy with this situation.
Is it possible the Compliance Officer is just simply way out her depth and the SFA are loath to sack her for fear of losing even more credibility?
Watch his facial expression change when McGregor makes the challenge,that should tell you all you need to know.
We can go on and on picking the bones of all this,and what's done is done,but we should be demanding the removal of head honchos Lawwell and Doncaster,as long as they are there,nothing will change and will remain corrupt.That's the thing now, the SFA and CO are now putting words into the ref's mouth, therefore putting more pressure on to already stressed out ref's as they are being made to look like complete buffoons and downright liars
The SPFA and Fraser Wishart should be questioning referee's lying to get their players suspended. Thomson and Collum have also been caught lying this week.
A lie, designed to clear himself of any blame.
Does no one read the thread headline " rumoured " ......the media and the SFA can't possibly have put Madden in a position where he'd have to lie about seeing/not seeing an incident where there is concrete proof stating the bloody obvious that there is .......
I believe that is exactly what they are doing, if madden sees it they can't ban Mcgregor,,, its the same with colum, l believe he was pressured by the sfa to come with that pile of shite he spoutedNo, a lie designed to give the SFA the authority to retrospectively punish a Rangers player! It has nothing to do with absolving anyone. It is simply the mechanism that their own rule-book requires in order to offer retrospective punishment.
It’s quite strange how the rules on the CO and what they can cite has changed even in the last few days.
“We can’t cite a player if a refeeree has already given them a card”.
Bad tackle on Celtic player, yellow card.
“We can now retrospectively upgrade yellow cards”.
Next one could go two ways:
“We can’t cite a player if the referee has seen the incident”
Picture of Bobby Madden looking directly at the incident...
“We can now cite a player even if the referee has seen the incident” / “Bobby, can you just lie and say you didn’t see the incident even though it’s blatanlty obvious you did? You’ll get your Lawwell brown envelope in the post.”
why would they be reluctant to sack her? she's doing a splendid job to many
We would do well to remember this is an internet rumour.
If more than a rumour he's finished.
It is not an internet rumour and he won't be finished.
The Compliance Officer cannot re-referee a game (no laughing at the back!) and can only act when NONE OF THE OFFICIALS have seen an incident, or only saw part of the incident, but not the part that merited a red card.
In McShaggers case, it states on the SFA website "Disciplinary Rule allegedly breached: Disciplinary Rule 200 : Where any one of the sending off offences of (A1) serious foul play, (A2) violent conduct, and (A3) spitting at an opponent or other person is committed by a player at a match, but that sending off offence was not seen by any of the match officials at the time that it was committed the mandatory suspension for that sending off offence as provided for in Annex C of the Judicial Panel Protocol shall be applied to the player.
All 4 officials would have been asked by the C.O. if they had seen the incident. If any of them say "yes, I saw it", the Compliance Officers involvement ends there and proceedings cannot continue. If they say "No, I never saw it", they are asked to submit statements, which are part of the case.
So, by citing and banning McShagger, Madden, who pictures prove had a clear view of the incident, and the other 3 officials, including the Assistant, who should have been directly in line with the incident, looking for a potential offside, must all have claimed (in writing) to the Compliance Officer, that they never saw it.
If ever we needed proof that the system is corrupt and people are lying, it is right there in this one incident.
FFS!! He's looking straight at itWhatever Madden, you useless twat -
Rangers should simply send that excerpt from their judgement and the picture of Madden clearly looking at the incident.
They are absolute cheating bastards.