Blueranger45
Well-Known Member
if Kane's ankle doesn't go and he plays like a proper striker, he'll score at least 30+ for Man City easily
Harry Kane.It’s my opinion , some may disagree . Who would you rather have in your team ?
It's a myth mate. One team makes a bid. It gets accepted. Team 2 makes the same bid. It gets acceptedBoth clubs need a striker, both clubs able and willing to pay big £
City offering players + £ suggests they value him higher than £100m. Man Utd need a top striker if they want to compete for the title any time soon
Can see him eventually going for £120m+
They won't replace him and Levy won't hand the money over either think that's why Conte turned down the managers job.Spurs will try to hold on to Kane because they are a 2nd tier 'top club' who know they will never attract a player as good as him as a replacement, no matter how much they spend.
Who in their right mind would go to Spurs?
It's a myth mate. One team makes a bid. It gets accepted. Team 2 makes the same bid. It gets accepted
I think most would agree that he's a good goalscorer, but we can also agree that he's never worth £100m in a million years.I watch a lot of Spurs (unfortunately) and I'm still puzzled why the majority of FF seem to think Harry Kane is shite, he's anything but, he's always had goals in his locker but his link up play has improved as has his assist ratio
Then again a lot of FF wanted Rangers to sign Dykes
Once upon a time people said that when £1 million was paid.Paying £100m for a football player is obscene.
I love Alfie but this is utter nonsense. Kane and Lewandowski are the best out and out number 9’s on the planet.Some may disagree but for me Alfredo Morelos is better than Kane . £100 million for Kane , is someone having a laugh here ? You could get Morelos for £20 million and save £80 million and get a younger , better player .
The same Harry Kane that had the most assists in the league last season?He’s have maybe scored more but wouldn’t have created as many . I much prefer watching Morelos in his pomp than Kane .
Paying over 100 million for a 28 year old Kane when you could get a four years young Morelos for a fraction of the price strikes me as nuts .
Some may disagree but for me Alfredo Morelos is better than Kane . £100 million for Kane , is someone having a laugh here ? You could get Morelos for £20 million and save £80 million and get a younger , better player .
It doesn’t matter how many assists he’s had he isn’t worth £80 million more than Morelos . FactThe same Harry Kane that had the most assists in the league last season?
You’re definitely at it.
He's worth what anybody is willing to pay for him. Same goes for Morelos.It doesn’t matter how many assists he’s had he isn’t worth £80 million more than Morelos . Fact
Sorted that for you mateWhy pay £100m for someone Grant Hanley had in his pocket
They could get Morelos for 120m euros.
It that some backtracking? You claimed he wouldn’t have created as many goals as Alfie. He created more.It doesn’t matter how many assists he’s had he isn’t worth £80 million more than Morelos . Fact
He wants to play with De Bruyne does he not?
A potentially dynamite dynamic duo.
You do realise saying fact at the end of your opinion really doesn’t make it a fact.It doesn’t matter how many assists he’s had he isn’t worth £80 million more than Morelos . Fact
I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind on this mate . I’m saying if there were two doors in front of me right now , one with Morelos behind it and a bag holding £80 million, and another door with just Harry Kane behind it , I know what door I’m choosing . I don’t know why that seems to have triggered so many negative responses . Morelos is vastly under rated by so many of our support and I just don’t understand it . If you want to pay £100 million for Harry Kane then go ahead but I’ll save £80 million and buy Morelos .You do realise saying fact at the end of your opinion really doesn’t make it a fact.
You are embarrassing yourself with this.
Scores loads of goals in the PL,If he had pace he would be genuinely world class for me he's a level below it.
Kane will score shit loads at Man City but if your looking long term it should be Haaland.
I love Alfie but you are having a laugh.Some may disagree but for me Alfredo Morelos is better than Kane . £100 million for Kane , is someone having a laugh here ? You could get Morelos for £20 million and save £80 million and get a younger , better player .
I watch a lot of Spurs (unfortunately) and I'm still puzzled why the majority of FF seem to think Harry Kane is shite, he's anything but, he's always had goals in his locker but his link up play has improved as has his assist ratio
Then again a lot of FF wanted Rangers to sign Dykes
Comes across as such on the Spurs Amazon All or Nothing documentary.Levy is a fucking halfwit.
Nothing wrong with that. Just common sense.I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind on this mate . I’m saying if there were two doors in front of me right now , one with Morelos behind it and a bag holding £80 million, and another door with just Harry Kane behind it , I know what door I’m choosing . I don’t know why that seems to have triggered so many negative responses . Morelos is vastly under rated by so many of our support and I just don’t understand it . If you want to pay £100 million for Harry Kane then go ahead but I’ll save £80 million and buy Morelos .
I think most would agree that he's a good goalscorer, but we can also agree that he's never worth £100m in a million years.
RinoSpurs will try to hold on to Kane because they are a 2nd tier 'top club' who know they will never attract a player as good as him as a replacement, no matter how much they spend.
Who in their right mind would go to Spurs?
Not sure he's ever been in his right mindRino
His goals for both Spurs and England may give a clue as to whyI don’t get the hype with him
Yes, of course, no footballer is worth such an obscene amount of money, but if we put aside the morality of it, Manchester Utd and Arsenal paying those kind of sums for average talent like Maguire and Pepe is why those clubs are where they are. For £100m, I'd be expecting at the very least a proven winner, or a truly special talent like Mbappé or Haaland. Kane is neither.He's not worth 100m on the basis that no football player should be worth that amount of money. But in the modern market? If McGuire is worth 80m and Pepe 70m how is Harry Kane not worth 100m? He's on track to be the highest scorer in the history of the English Premier League.
Nonsense; saying Kane's the better player isn't disrespecting AlfieI’m not trying to change anyone’s mind on this mate . I’m saying if there were two doors in front of me right now , one with Morelos behind it and a bag holding £80 million, and another door with just Harry Kane behind it , I know what door I’m choosing . I don’t know why that seems to have triggered so many negative responses . Morelos is vastly under rated by so many of our support and I just don’t understand it . If you want to pay £100 million for Harry Kane then go ahead but I’ll save £80 million and buy Morelos .
Mbappe went for almost double that as a teenager before he won anything.Yes, of course, no footballer is worth such an obscene amount of money, but if we put aside the morality of it, Manchester Utd and Arsenal paying those kind of sums for average talent like Maguire and Pepe is why those clubs are where they are. For £100m, I'd be expecting at the very least a proven winner, or a truly special talent like Mbappé or Haaland. Kane is neither.
Absolutely mate. Like an exaggerated character in a shite sitcom.Comes across as such on the Spurs Amazon All or Nothing documentary.