Not at us no but nearby there is much hilarity.‘No-one’s laughing now’
Boyd is‘No-one’s laughing now’
Possibly Rod Wallace and Stuart Munro would be up there in the past 30 odd years.kamara is best bit of busines we've done in many a year
when the media talk of their amazing recruitment, what they are actually referring to is transfers that happened about 7 years ago and getting lucky with Dembele & Edouard. everything in between has been horrendous, utterly gloriousRecruitment is key. That mob have wasted all the profit from Tierney on nonsense such as Duffy, Ajeti, Barkas and Kilmala. It’s crucial we don’t make the same mistake.
CorrectThe best thing about our business nowadays is that nobody has a clue what's happening until the ink is dry and we want people to know what's happened.
Yes you can.In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Agree getting big fees can help but if you are selling your better players and replacing with flops and not strengthening overall results will suffer and your assets will depreciate. We are seeing this happen now. Gerrard has had some signings that did not work Grezda, Sadiq Stewart and others but for every Rangers signing that did not work out under Gerrard you can easily name 2-3 for Celtic during same time frame(or perhaps not as they are loaned out or hardly played).Recruitment is key. That mob have wasted all the profit from Tierney on nonsense such as Duffy, Ajeti, Barkas and Kilmala. It’s crucial we don’t make the same mistake.
100% agreement here even if Kamara ran his contract down and left on a free he has paid 50k fee and wages in his overall performances easily.Yes you can.
He’s been pivotal to our success in Europe and a potential league title come May. That in itself generates a shit load of cash which has been great from a “business and commercial” point of view.
That’s like no saying Davie Weir wasn’t good business because we didn’t sell him for a fee
How is signing a player that would now be in a different universe in terms of what we could afford to bring in for £50k not good business?In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
All three definitely fall under “many a year”Possibly Rod Wallace and Stuart Munro would be up there in the past 30 odd years.
Add in Mccoist for 325k ? .
Really?In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
So if we never sold Kamara and he stayed here for 10 years,won 5 league titles,was a mainstay in the team,he wouldn't have been good business?In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
That's right, because players don't do anything on the pitch that contributes to the clubs success or further income...In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Sorry, mate, but that's pish. If he left tomorrow for nothing his performances would still mean he'd paid back the £50k transfer fee many times over.In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
I bet your head is hurting now.In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
I’m laughing, I’ve been laughing for months, not at Rangers though!!!‘No-one’s laughing now’
Novo in that bracket as well he scored some pretty important goals that generated us a lot of money.Possibly Rod Wallace and Stuart Munro would be up there in the past 30 odd years.
Add in Mccoist for 325k ? .
Mate, his 5 mins performance in a win in Europe covers the £50k considering we get around £1m for each winIn the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Ridiculous.In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
That’s just rubbish we never sold Ian Ferguson or John Brown, Goram or McCoist i could go on ,all where bought at a very reasonable price whose contribution to Rangers was much more than had we sold them.In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Those mystical transfers...when the media talk of their amazing recruitment, what they are actually referring to is transfers that happened about 7 years ago and getting lucky with Dembele & Edouard. everything in between has been horrendous, utterly glorious
its amazing that our entire midfield cost 50K
That’s a load of pish .In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Agree getting big fees can help but if you are selling your better players and replacing with flops and not strengthening overall results will suffer and your assets will depreciate. We are seeing this happen now. Gerrard has had some signings that did not work Grezda, Sadiq Stewart and others but for every Rangers signing that did not work out under Gerrard you can easily name 2-3 for Celtic during same time frame(or perhaps not as they are loaned out or hardly played).
40 years nearly, ffs i am getting oldAll three definitely fall under “many a year”
In the SPL a player is only good business once you actually get them sold for a lot more than you paid for. You can't say Kamara has been good business until we actually sell him.
Forgot about novo.Novo in that bracket as well he scored some pretty important goals that generated us a lot of money.
Stop digging. Let it go quietly.Kamara has been a great signing from a footballing perspective, but you can't really say it has been great business until we actually sell him for a high price.
There is so little money in the SPL shirt sales and TV money probably hardly covers players wages.
Boumsong is a great piece of business that springs to mind, signed for free and sold months later for £8m.