Maybe it's just the modern way or maybe I'm just getting old but everything nowadays seems to be dissected and analysed to death. The new Rangers managers job is no exception. Who has he managed, where has he managed, what's his win percentage, what's his style of play, what's his favourite formation, who's his favoured backroom staff, someone even mentioned Kevin Thomson's voice being boring FFS.
Now I realise that it's a big decision for the club and we're all a bit anxious about it but some of the stuff in this thread is unreal.
For what it's worth I think the manager's job is scrutinised and complicated far too much. The manager's job is to get the players to play in a way that wins games. It really is that simple. I wanted Dyche because I thought he'd be the best at doing that but if it's not him I'd prefer Beale.
I think the players will play for him and he shows a lot of contempt for the other mob which is a must. I agree that if it is Beale his assistants could be crucial to his success.
The bottom line is that any manager is a gamble no matter who they are. We can only hope that whoever gets it is a success and wins us league titles.
