If the arseholes who makes these decisions are going to be the ones monitoring VAR then there is absolutely no point campaigning to bring it in.
A shower of cheating bastards.
A shower of cheating bastards.
The club could easily compile a video of every disgraceful decision awarded against us, from this season alone, starting with the ridiculous red card (overturned of course) that Clancy dished out to Morelos on day 1.
Guys, what was the general consensus with the TV pundits and journos with regards the foul/booking. Were they on Morelos's side? Serious question not being sarcastic.
The ones I saw all agreed it was a penalty - Sportscene and Clyde One SS.
Having seen the replays, I would say it's a penalty but he goes down theatrically with it. I think (much like the Brophy/Worral one a few weeks back) there's a good shout but the player has effectively conned himself out of a pen by going down too dramatically.
How a review on appeal though can't see the arm round the neck and how it is obstructing his run is beyond me.
Two games in a row now, Easter Road and Ibrox, that the ref involved has done us over. I've been mocked on here endlessly when I say we're not being allowed to compete, but I can't come to any other conclusion.
No because you are talking shite and if you're not a mentally challenged then you're not right in the head.So, just because I am not blinkered I must be a Tim? Sad the way some of our fans think.
I've always though that way. There was a pull around the shoulders by the Aberdeen player but no-where near enough to make Morelos go to ground so I'd be fine with a booking plus penalty.
I've said it many times, I hate players diving, especially our own.
We can say all we want about the performances on the park, and its clear we need to improve, but if we had been refereed even half competently, we would be damn close if not ahead in the league.
True Blue but can't argue with not right in the head and have often been accused of talking shite but stand by all I've said on hereNo because you are talking shite and if you're not a mentally challenged then you're not right in the head.
First game of the season. There’s another two.Just off the top of my head we would have 4 extra points the lafferty disallowed goal against Dundee the foul on tav v hibs where they go up the pitch and score
Ok mate. I'm pissed off we'll just have to agree to disagree thenTrue Blue but can't argue with not right in the head and have often been accused of talking shite but stand by all I've said on here
Just off the top of my head we would have 4 extra points the lafferty disallowed goal against Dundee the foul on tav v hibs where they go up the pitch and score
Court for Arbitration of sportI just don't see where we go from here.
Its clear to see we're not getting decisions, even when appealing and presumably presenting solid evidence.
Where do we turn? Media outlets, SFA again, UEFA?
We would have gotten a point at the piggery if Collum had listened to his 4th official (Beaton) and gave a foul on Jack in the build up to their goal.Probably another 2 first game of the season if Morelos is on the pitch.
I can only think of one decision that has went for us and that's Alfies offside goal at Tynecastle. The rest have been against us.We can say all we want about the performances on the park, and its clear we need to improve, but if we had been refereed even half competently, we would be damn close if not ahead in the league.
so you think it's ok thenFor that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
Just off the top of my head we would have 4 extra points the lafferty disallowed goal against Dundee the foul on tav v hibs where they go up the pitch and score
Which is fine, that’s a fair enough comment. But did Brophy get booked for diving?
When was the last time we played a game when there wasn't an awful decision given against us? The 3-0 at Livingston in January?
I'm now convinced when we got booted down the league's,the refs got together and put their houses on they other lot getting 10 in a row and now because we're getting closer they're making sure they they cheat us so their bet comes up! fucking has to be something like this,this stinks to high heaven!
they had no choice any other decision was going to prove their bias, this way we an only suspect it, all be it the evidence proves he was incorrectly yellow carded, fucking scum of the earth
So it wasn't a foul? So we can do that to other teams? I think not.Alfie did not dive: fact established with incontrovertible video proof. This demonstrates what we are up against
When was the last time we played a game when there wasn't an awful decision given against us? The 3-0 at Livingston in January?
No point in bringing var in if that's what the panel come up with.
Does he aye. Maybe if he wasn’t trying to fight with one hand tied behind his back due to some of the stupid chants then he would have more ammunition.is that fat f uck Traynor still on our PR staff if he is he needs rooting (aussie coliquiasimn) with the blunt end of a dunny brush
Who’s going to operate VAR though? That’s as much an issue as getting it installedWe need to lead the call for VAR. Cant see us winning a League title otherwise.
That would represent a swing of three points in our favour, if we'd drawn that game, rather than Shame FC winning it.We would have gotten a point at the piggery if Collum had listened to his 4th official (Beaton) and gave a foul on Jack in the build up to their goal.
Very true but suspect that the decision not to overrule Clancy was strongly influenced by having to concede that McLean messed up last Friday and to confirm that another of their so called top refs got a big decision wrong would have been damaging to whatever credibility that the refereeing department still have.Clancy was never going to be overruled. He is the media golden bhoy ref and heir to the cheating crown currently held by Craig Thomson, who is near to retirement. We are going to be done over by him for years to come.