Iirc they have said previously they can onlu
Use “real time” footage
So with that being said then the footage from behind the goal wouldn’t count as it was slow motion wasn’t it?
Hadn’t seen the behind the goal footage until now. Penalty all day long.Stunning. When even the BBC commentator is saying 'that looks like a penalty' then you know its a stick-on. The footage from behind the goal is clear as day.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47450648
No idea mate I’m not even sure that’s the reason just the only thing I can think ofThe footage wasn't recorded in slow motion. It was slowed down for the viewer, surely the club would have access to the footage in real time?
What the fck does, 'later on', have to do with this ridiculous miscarriage of justice?For that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
No idea mate I’m not even sure that’s the reason just the only thing I can think of
We can be sure that those dealing with VAR will be neutral?We need to lead the call for VAR. Cant see us winning a League title otherwise.
We’re all sick of saying it but the club need to take a stand. The view behind the goal shows the referee got it wrong, it was a pen and considine should have been booked.
Listen I knew they couldn't overturn that card.
If they had they were hanging Clancy from the nearest tree and that's never happening is it, same scenario as Candias blowing kisses.
We all seen it from behind the goal stone waller.
Let's hope we don't see Clancy again this season!
As long as the club sit back and do "dignified silence", then these cheating bastards, aided by their corrupt bosses at the SFA, will continue shafting our club.
Totally irrelevant to the point of the thread, Morelos is fouled in the box, defender makes no attempt to play the ball, by the rules penalty and red card for defender. What happens later is different because the dynamics of the game have changed. your second comment only reinforces opinions that referees are inconsistent if the second incident you referred to is the same as the first one Alfie was booked for the referee should have been consistent and booked him again.For that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
Two wrongs by the ref then?For that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
Exactly. The first decision by the ref can be explained away as an error or incompetence. However this one is sinister and absolutely reprehensible.The club have an open goal here, to publicly condemn the referee and the appeal process. Not only does the video evidence confirm that the referee made an error. This is then compounded by the appeal panel supporting his decision.
It is incomprhensible how and why the appeal when presented with this evidence, came to this conclusion.
I'll say this in as nice a way I can think of at the moment. Don't be so fůcking stupid!For that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
We should not enter the Scottish Cup next season.
Need to go to town on clancyCorrupt. The club needs to go to town on this farce.
Please stop posting pish. If Clancy, McLean and the rest were just poor and not corrupt than it wouldn't be so one-sided, would it?Calncy is not a cheat, just a very poor referee very easily influenced. Morelos has to learn though to change the act. He needs to stop the theatrical stuff. Otherwise he is losing his effectiveness.
Please be wrong, any cheat bar that kunt!Sadly he will get an OF game no doubt as reward.
Of course, this.Listen I knew they couldn't overturn that card.
If they had they were hanging Clancy from the nearest tree and that's never happening is it, same scenario as Candias blowing kisses.
We all seen it from behind the goal stone waller.
Let's hope we don't see Clancy again this season!
We need to lead the call for VAR. Cant see us winning a League title otherwise.
For that booking he was definitely fouled .. But he could have quite easily got a booking later on for diving
Seriously!!!!!!!it wasn't a penalty. and he went down too easily. should have stayed on his feet. this is not proof of any conspiracy.
Stunning. When even the BBC commentator is saying 'that looks like a penalty' then you know its a stick-on. The footage from behind the goal is clear as day.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47450648
it wasn't a penalty. and he went down too easily. should have stayed on his feet. this is not proof of any conspiracy.
No way could that be overturned without creating an even bigger shit storm. Really poor decision from Clancy now compounded by another bad decision. This just further undermines the whole system.
Calncy is not a cheat, just a very poor referee very easily influenced. Morelos has to learn though to change the act. He needs to stop the theatrical stuff. Otherwise he is losing his effectiveness.
the same viewing from behind goal when killie was the same m8 and astonishingly they cleard himStunning. When even the BBC commentator is saying 'that looks like a penalty' then you know its a stick-on. The footage from behind the goal is clear as day.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/47450648
It's not a problem for Scott Sinclair.
Morelos and Rangers are refereed differently - this is the issue.
correct apart from - its a red
no genuine attempt to play the ball
Well, I'm no genius but I'd suggest doing something different from what we're currently doing?Seriously, what can the club do to stand any chance against open cheating against us?
Club should just call a press conference and have a huge blown up picture of the incident. And then say:
"Any questions?"
How do you know he should have stayed on his feet?it wasn't a penalty. and he went down too easily. should have stayed on his feet. this is not proof of any conspiracy.