Most 'fouling' team in SPFL

Beer Belly Loyal

Well-Known Member
After eight SPFL matches Livingston top the table.

But there's something more revealing within it and stinks to high heaven.

Never take your eye off the ball.

gn20.png
 

Billiericky

Well-Known Member
Was wondering about this.

This is fouls awarded by the ref that lead to a stoppage?

Most games I've watched this season the officials will wave play on if a Rangers player is fouled (apparently playing an advantage to us). Bookings almost never follow on either.
 

onelegwonder

Well-Known Member
After eight SPFL matches Livingston top the table.

But there's something more revealing within it and stinks to high heaven.

Never take your eye off the ball.

gn20.png
Did they not give over 20 fouls against Aberdeen in the last game and not get any players booked?

edit. talking shite, just checked, they got 3 players booked.
 

IbroxForever

Well-Known Member
Every stat goes in there favour every season, yet the media make out the refs are against them. Rangers should have these stats on twitter every week.
 

Masonboyne

Well-Known Member
After eight SPFL matches Livingston top the table.

But there's something more revealing within it and stinks to high heaven.

Never take your eye off the ball.

gn20.png
They're some stats. Believe what you see, it's a blatant as hell. These Rangers minded Masonic refs are a disgrace
 

Mac72

Well-Known Member
Did they not give over 20 fouls against Aberdeen in the last game and not get any players booked?

edit. talking shite, just checked, they got 3 players booked.
I'm sure it took to about 20 fouls before they got booked but after that they got a few bookings. I'm sure they committed nearly 30 fouls in that game.

Anytime I've seen that Soro he gets about 7-10 fouls before he actually gets booked. There really should be a foul count were after consistent fouling you get an automatic booking. Like 5 fouls.

I'm sure Starvelt always gets away with a ludicrous amount of fouling aswell.
 

JamboReid1874

Well-Known Member
I'm sure it took to about 20 fouls before they got booked but after that they got a few bookings. I'm sure they committed nearly 30 fouls in that game.

Anytime I've seen that Soro he gets about 7-10 fouls before he actually gets booked. There really should be a foul count were after consistent fouling you get an automatic booking. Like 5 fouls.

I'm sure Starvelt always gets away with a ludicrous amount of fouling aswell.
Add Jota to that list. Surprisingly niggly player.
 

Wilkinsvolley

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
Did they not give over 20 fouls against Aberdeen in the last game and not get any players booked?

edit. talking shite, just checked, they got 3 players booked.
They’re using the Aberdeen game as proof they’re victims because of the number of fouls given against them. But they have shite players trying to press all over the place and the table in the OP shows what they’re really getting away with. If the refs gave them cards when they should, they wouldn’t be able to press and foul as much as they do because they should be getting yellow cards for persistent fouling. Jota kicked the Aberdeen player every time the ball went near him.
 

Crown_Defender

Well-Known Member
Official Ticketer
Their answer.

Rangers get away with fouls and that's why the foul count is low.
Celtic get penalised when no foul is committed.

You can't reason with their level of paranoia and delusion.

Which also explains their low card count. The refs have penalised them for so many 'non fouls' they couldn't possibly show cards too, that would be TOO obvious.

Think that about covers it?:)
 
Top