Charlesdexterward
Well-Known Member
No danger would one of them get over the door of my house.
Just beat me to it. First thought was I can imagine a few Ayrshire 50+ women salivating at the prospectNo doubt there will be some fat middle aged couples volunteering to take in these chancers to be used as sex toys.
Same as all these wimmin who helped out as charity workers in Calais and were caught out shaggin lots of them"child refugees".
great post but I'm sure you already know the answer to your question.One can sympathise with the plight of genuine refugees, but essentially what people are being asked to do here is to take in someone they don't know from Adam, who doesn't speak the language and who can't even be vetted by the authorities prior to being housed somewhere. This is utter lunacy.
Where are all the social justice warriors now? Why don't they practice what they preach and take these people in?
Many of the children born here are abandoned by the care system when they reach 16, there isnt enough families or support. It's madness.
First, they are not refugees. Once they leave their first point of refuge they cease to be refugees and become something else, economic migrants, call it what you like.
The term refugee is used for emotive effect.
Those advocating this now need to go to the end of every waiting list, NHS, school or university of choice, housing, police response, dentist and doctor appointments, etc., etc., but we know they won't.
It will be those already at the bottom of society who will take the consequences of this, not Nigel and Tabitha waiving their banners about.
Those advocating this should lead by example, but again we know they won't.
They should have that in the ad then:
"Fully furnished asylum seeker. Free to a good home."
First, they are not refugees. Once they leave their first point of refuge they cease to be refugees and become something else, economic migrants, call it what you like.
The term refugee is used for emotive effect.
Those advocating this now need to go to the end of every waiting list, NHS, school or university of choice, housing, police response, dentist and doctor appointments, etc., etc., but we know they won't.
It will be those already at the bottom of society who will take the consequences of this, not Nigel and Tabitha waiving their banners about.
Those advocating this should lead by example, but again we know they won't.