Now is the time for Rangers and their fans to rekindle their Scotland relationship

I would suggest whoever wrote that would have been better, if he truly wanted Rangers supporters to re-engage with the Scotland team, directing his article at the people who have and continue to make Rangers supporters unwelcome in the stands at Scotland matches and elsewhere.
In the case of any other group that article would have been slanted toward the behaviour of those causing us not to attend having to change. And by those I mean those among the Scotland support who verbally abuse Rangers players, the manager whose insult was televised and the SFA hierarchy whose treatment of Rangers as a club and certain of our players, such as Alan McGregor, has been asymmetrical at best.
Were we to see some sort of recognition of these wrongs and a degree of written censure toward such as these perhaps we would imagine a corner being turned. Until then I’ll stick to no more than hoping our players return from international duty in the condition they went.
 
It's depressing hearing so many Rangers fans happy to allow the national team divide us. I'd like to go the other way and fill Hampden with our fans, singing both of our national anthems.
It would be interesting to see our fans battle with the Nats for the team. We have the numbers, but clearly not the desire.
 
Not for the last 40 years thanks. If it wasn't entirely dead then 2012 killed it completely.
 
A few things.

We were stitched up four years before by the SFA re- our UEFA Cup Final in 2008 and then they expect us to cheer for their bunch of losers.
Same again 2012 when everyone and their dug wanted us dead.
Above re- Ian Ferguson.
Their manager is a two-faced boring kvnt.
How any Rangers supporter could cheer on someone like Griffiths and his ilk, no thanks.
Didn't even know they were playing last night until I read it on here this morning.

And this from someone who used to love going to watch Scotland from the 60's to the 80's.
 
So no mention of the Tammany Hall corruption and bias at the SFA that has, in recent years, been turned into a cudgel to beat Rangers by Liewells machinations. An organisation that is against bigotry yet employs Malky Mackay. An SFA that has a vocal anti-Rangers bigot in Rod McKenzie at the top table. An SFA that will only appoint Compliance Officers with a Celtc minded background and history. An SFA that has looked the other way for decades at the plethora of paedophiles who have wandered the corridors, dressing rooms, training fields and Directors Box of Celtc Park and voted the culpable Members of Celtc's board to the highest echelons of their establishment. Spotted the common denominator yet? Oh! but we should just naively separate them in our minds from their select team and roll up, pay our Blue Pounds, and nod along appreciatively to the Anglophobic dirge that is "Flower of Scotland".

And what of the so called "Tartan Army" nowadays? These pathetic caricatures of extras from Brigadoon, with their virulent fascistic nationalism that has chased thousands from attending Scotland games, and not just Rangers fans. Check the attendances at Hampden recently, it's just not Bears who have deserted the ranks. Hatred of the English seems a prerequisite to being accepted into their fold. That they have consistently targeted Rangers players representing Scotland and that has been consistently ignored by Scottish journalists, and the reasons for it, and has again been shamefully ignored in this piss poor article.

I'm in my sixties. I was a regular at Hampden from the late sixties through the seventies and into the early eighties with three Wembley trips to my name. The above events have rendered me, at best ambivalent to the national team, and occasionally hostile towards it. Something that has increased since they appointed the bigot with the personality by-pass and selective hearing as manager.

Oh! and the football fan and purist in me believes that the Euros have been massively devalued by the expansion of the tournament to include sub standard teams, like this present Scotland side.
 
Article in the Herald. Says it like it is really.



THE relationship between Rangers - or more specifically Rangers supporters - and the Scotland national team is a complex yet fascinating one.

It encompasses every aspect of life on and off the park as political opinions and club loyalties shape views and define behaviours when it comes to the support, or not, of the side that represent the country on the world stage.

At times it feels as though sections of the Rangers fanbase have never been more disillusioned or out of touch with Scotland and in many ways that disconnect is completely understandable. But, in a purely football and sporting sense, Scotland are good for Rangers and Rangers must be good for Scotland.

Steven Gerrard has spoken of his desire to see Scotland improve and succeed, and also of his delight at his players earning international recognition in recent times. The likes of Borna Barisic and Glen Kamara will be at the Euros next summer. That will raise their profile, but also that of Rangers and having players operating at the highest level can only further enhance the club's reputation. Gerrard has done so much on that front in a European sense and the more internationalists Rangers have the better. It is a shame, though, that there are not more players within Gerrard's ranks that can stake a claim to feature for Steve Clarke.

Going forward, and as the Ibrox squad evolves, that should be a consideration for Rangers and a club that has given so much to the national side over the years must once again be able to provide the backbone of the Scotland setup. Ryan Jack has become a mainstay of the side under Clarke in recent fixtures, but some Gers fans will only tune in to see if he plays well and emerges unscathed for his return to domestic and European duty.

The pride that Jack has in playing for his country is clear to see and it should be hoped that rubs off on those who dismiss Scotland duty. Rangers could certainly do with more like him and goalkeeper Jon McLaughlin. The lack of Rangers representation in the national squad over recent years may explain the apathy that some sections of the support have towards Scotland these days.

But more wide-ranging issues - such as the treatment their club received in 2012 and the Independence Referendum two years later - almost certainly have a significant part to play in the seeming shift away from the traditional backing that Gers fans once provided to the national side.

Last month, The Athletic carried out a survey of more than 8000 supporters to attempt to paint a picture of the relationship between Rangers fans and Scotland. There is no definitive answer to such a convoluted question, but it did at least offer an insight when it comes to the club versus country debate.

From a football viewpoint, it was no surprise to see that 68 per cent stated that their support for the national team had decreased since 2012. The feelings of anger and resentment from the fall-out of Rangers' financial collapse clearly still lingers in the minds of many and there is no desire to share a terrace or emotional connection with fans of clubs who wished them nothing but ill will eight years ago.

Indeed, 87 per cent of those that responded to The Athletic believed they would receive a negative reaction if they identified as a Rangers fan at a Scotland match. It is hard to conclude that figure would be as high for any other support in the country and while Rangers punters may dismiss it with the 'no-one likes us, we don't care' attitude, it is sad that fans feel they would be unwelcome at an event that is supposed to unite in the backing of a common, national cause.

While fans across the country revelled in Rangers' fight for survival and subsequent plights on their journey back, the Ibrox crowd remained admirably loyal and devoted to their club and their cause. Having come through what they have, the bond between fan and club is stronger than ever.

Many will have taken heart and pleasure from seeing Scotland end their wait to return to a major finals with victory over Serbia last week. But it will be nothing compared to the emotions when Rangers win their 55th league title. Scotland matters, but just not as much as Rangers, or as much as it does to fans of other clubs.

The team on the park is only part of the problem, though, and many will simply find it unpalatable to support Scotland for reasons other than football. When Scotland is divided politically, it is no surprise that the makeup of the fanbase is as well. While 55 per cent of those in the poll didn't think that being a Unionist was an important part of a Rangers fan's identity, 75 per cent believed that Nationalism was synonymous with the Scotland support.

It is too simplistic to say that the dual identity of being Scottish and British doesn't fit amongst the national support but views on Government and the Union will come into the thinking for some. Figures for ideology and voting preference in a referendum were broadly similar at around 65 per cent Unionist, 10 per cent Nationalist and a quarter neither.

In decades gone by, the Rangers support made up a huge percentage of the Tartan Army home and away and it would be healthy if the numbers were to swell once again. Scotland is as much theirs as it is anyone else's. But if it doesn't happen in the build-up to the European Championships, then it is hard to see how and when there will be a reconnection between Light and Dark Blue going forward.

Now is the time for Rangers to become prominent and lead the way for Scotland, both on and off the park, once again.
That's the most positive article about us I've seen in the mhedia for a long time. I wonder why the SFA and the cabal would want Rangers fans to back the national team. They make no secret they hate us and everything we stand for but still want our cash. Bankrupt of money and morals.
 
I think the antipathy of our support towards the Scotland national side has been brewing for longer than since 2012,
However, the last eight years has merely seen it far more clearly defined against an identifiable background of hatred towards Rangers from those that run the side and many of those from the other clubs who support it.
The SNP have also successfully driven an ugly divide into the cultural and political body of the nation itself.
These are difficult factors to overcome for the Rangers supporters, probably impossible ones.

How different it was back in the sixties and seventies when I would attend as many Scotland games as I was able to.
Back then regardless of who was in the team, the majority of those standing on those packed terraces bedecked in tartan were the same people who packed Ibrox on matchdays.
You don't fill Hampden with over a hundred thousand spectators to watch Scotland without us.

I am afraid to say it is a No from this Bear.
 
The headline could easily read "Now is the time for the Tartan Army to stop being pro independence, anti-unionist and anti-Rangers", but that doesn't get the point across that's it's all our fault.
That's very true, it's up to Rangers fans to change their ways and reach out the hand of friendship. Rather than up to the Teuchter TA to separate supporting the national team from separatism.
 
Fück them!

I simply can’t bring myself to support:

- an organisation who trampled all over us during our darkest hour
- an organisation who glossed over the SCF vs Hibs carry on like it was something we deserved
- an organisation who blessed the awarding and handling of last seasons league closure with refusal to support our request/appeal for an independent enquiry
- a tartan army who booed past and current Rangers players whilst playing for Scotland
- a tartan army who sung and chanted songs about hating Rangers
- a manager who openly admitted he hates Rangers
- a manager who shrugs off sectarian abuse of an ex-Rangers player but cries like a baby when the shoe is on the other foot
- a group of players who many of whom have a real bitterness towards our club/team/fans

Have I missed anything?
I think you got it all. Also, are we now supposed to pretend that the manager's not an alkie jakey anymore either?
 
Article in the Herald. Says it like it is really.



THE relationship between Rangers - or more specifically Rangers supporters - and the Scotland national team is a complex yet fascinating one.

It encompasses every aspect of life on and off the park as political opinions and club loyalties shape views and define behaviours when it comes to the support, or not, of the side that represent the country on the world stage.

At times it feels as though sections of the Rangers fanbase have never been more disillusioned or out of touch with Scotland and in many ways that disconnect is completely understandable. But, in a purely football and sporting sense, Scotland are good for Rangers and Rangers must be good for Scotland.

Steven Gerrard has spoken of his desire to see Scotland improve and succeed, and also of his delight at his players earning international recognition in recent times. The likes of Borna Barisic and Glen Kamara will be at the Euros next summer. That will raise their profile, but also that of Rangers and having players operating at the highest level can only further enhance the club's reputation. Gerrard has done so much on that front in a European sense and the more internationalists Rangers have the better. It is a shame, though, that there are not more players within Gerrard's ranks that can stake a claim to feature for Steve Clarke.

Going forward, and as the Ibrox squad evolves, that should be a consideration for Rangers and a club that has given so much to the national side over the years must once again be able to provide the backbone of the Scotland setup. Ryan Jack has become a mainstay of the side under Clarke in recent fixtures, but some Gers fans will only tune in to see if he plays well and emerges unscathed for his return to domestic and European duty.

The pride that Jack has in playing for his country is clear to see and it should be hoped that rubs off on those who dismiss Scotland duty. Rangers could certainly do with more like him and goalkeeper Jon McLaughlin. The lack of Rangers representation in the national squad over recent years may explain the apathy that some sections of the support have towards Scotland these days.

But more wide-ranging issues - such as the treatment their club received in 2012 and the Independence Referendum two years later - almost certainly have a significant part to play in the seeming shift away from the traditional backing that Gers fans once provided to the national side.

Last month, The Athletic carried out a survey of more than 8000 supporters to attempt to paint a picture of the relationship between Rangers fans and Scotland. There is no definitive answer to such a convoluted question, but it did at least offer an insight when it comes to the club versus country debate.

From a football viewpoint, it was no surprise to see that 68 per cent stated that their support for the national team had decreased since 2012. The feelings of anger and resentment from the fall-out of Rangers' financial collapse clearly still lingers in the minds of many and there is no desire to share a terrace or emotional connection with fans of clubs who wished them nothing but ill will eight years ago.

Indeed, 87 per cent of those that responded to The Athletic believed they would receive a negative reaction if they identified as a Rangers fan at a Scotland match. It is hard to conclude that figure would be as high for any other support in the country and while Rangers punters may dismiss it with the 'no-one likes us, we don't care' attitude, it is sad that fans feel they would be unwelcome at an event that is supposed to unite in the backing of a common, national cause.

While fans across the country revelled in Rangers' fight for survival and subsequent plights on their journey back, the Ibrox crowd remained admirably loyal and devoted to their club and their cause. Having come through what they have, the bond between fan and club is stronger than ever.

Many will have taken heart and pleasure from seeing Scotland end their wait to return to a major finals with victory over Serbia last week. But it will be nothing compared to the emotions when Rangers win their 55th league title. Scotland matters, but just not as much as Rangers, or as much as it does to fans of other clubs.

The team on the park is only part of the problem, though, and many will simply find it unpalatable to support Scotland for reasons other than football. When Scotland is divided politically, it is no surprise that the makeup of the fanbase is as well. While 55 per cent of those in the poll didn't think that being a Unionist was an important part of a Rangers fan's identity, 75 per cent believed that Nationalism was synonymous with the Scotland support.

It is too simplistic to say that the dual identity of being Scottish and British doesn't fit amongst the national support but views on Government and the Union will come into the thinking for some. Figures for ideology and voting preference in a referendum were broadly similar at around 65 per cent Unionist, 10 per cent Nationalist and a quarter neither.

In decades gone by, the Rangers support made up a huge percentage of the Tartan Army home and away and it would be healthy if the numbers were to swell once again. Scotland is as much theirs as it is anyone else's. But if it doesn't happen in the build-up to the European Championships, then it is hard to see how and when there will be a reconnection between Light and Dark Blue going forward.

Now is the time for Rangers to become prominent and lead the way for Scotland, both on and off the park, once again.
Sorry not for me , the bitterness of the tartan trannies is to intense
 
Article in the Herald. Says it like it is really.



THE relationship between Rangers - or more specifically Rangers supporters - and the Scotland national team is a complex yet fascinating one.

It encompasses every aspect of life on and off the park as political opinions and club loyalties shape views and define behaviours when it comes to the support, or not, of the side that represent the country on the world stage.

At times it feels as though sections of the Rangers fanbase have never been more disillusioned or out of touch with Scotland and in many ways that disconnect is completely understandable. But, in a purely football and sporting sense, Scotland are good for Rangers and Rangers must be good for Scotland.

Steven Gerrard has spoken of his desire to see Scotland improve and succeed, and also of his delight at his players earning international recognition in recent times. The likes of Borna Barisic and Glen Kamara will be at the Euros next summer. That will raise their profile, but also that of Rangers and having players operating at the highest level can only further enhance the club's reputation. Gerrard has done so much on that front in a European sense and the more internationalists Rangers have the better. It is a shame, though, that there are not more players within Gerrard's ranks that can stake a claim to feature for Steve Clarke.

Going forward, and as the Ibrox squad evolves, that should be a consideration for Rangers and a club that has given so much to the national side over the years must once again be able to provide the backbone of the Scotland setup. Ryan Jack has become a mainstay of the side under Clarke in recent fixtures, but some Gers fans will only tune in to see if he plays well and emerges unscathed for his return to domestic and European duty.

The pride that Jack has in playing for his country is clear to see and it should be hoped that rubs off on those who dismiss Scotland duty. Rangers could certainly do with more like him and goalkeeper Jon McLaughlin. The lack of Rangers representation in the national squad over recent years may explain the apathy that some sections of the support have towards Scotland these days.

But more wide-ranging issues - such as the treatment their club received in 2012 and the Independence Referendum two years later - almost certainly have a significant part to play in the seeming shift away from the traditional backing that Gers fans once provided to the national side.

Last month, The Athletic carried out a survey of more than 8000 supporters to attempt to paint a picture of the relationship between Rangers fans and Scotland. There is no definitive answer to such a convoluted question, but it did at least offer an insight when it comes to the club versus country debate.

From a football viewpoint, it was no surprise to see that 68 per cent stated that their support for the national team had decreased since 2012. The feelings of anger and resentment from the fall-out of Rangers' financial collapse clearly still lingers in the minds of many and there is no desire to share a terrace or emotional connection with fans of clubs who wished them nothing but ill will eight years ago.

Indeed, 87 per cent of those that responded to The Athletic believed they would receive a negative reaction if they identified as a Rangers fan at a Scotland match. It is hard to conclude that figure would be as high for any other support in the country and while Rangers punters may dismiss it with the 'no-one likes us, we don't care' attitude, it is sad that fans feel they would be unwelcome at an event that is supposed to unite in the backing of a common, national cause.

While fans across the country revelled in Rangers' fight for survival and subsequent plights on their journey back, the Ibrox crowd remained admirably loyal and devoted to their club and their cause. Having come through what they have, the bond between fan and club is stronger than ever.

Many will have taken heart and pleasure from seeing Scotland end their wait to return to a major finals with victory over Serbia last week. But it will be nothing compared to the emotions when Rangers win their 55th league title. Scotland matters, but just not as much as Rangers, or as much as it does to fans of other clubs.

The team on the park is only part of the problem, though, and many will simply find it unpalatable to support Scotland for reasons other than football. When Scotland is divided politically, it is no surprise that the makeup of the fanbase is as well. While 55 per cent of those in the poll didn't think that being a Unionist was an important part of a Rangers fan's identity, 75 per cent believed that Nationalism was synonymous with the Scotland support.

It is too simplistic to say that the dual identity of being Scottish and British doesn't fit amongst the national support but views on Government and the Union will come into the thinking for some. Figures for ideology and voting preference in a referendum were broadly similar at around 65 per cent Unionist, 10 per cent Nationalist and a quarter neither.

In decades gone by, the Rangers support made up a huge percentage of the Tartan Army home and away and it would be healthy if the numbers were to swell once again. Scotland is as much theirs as it is anyone else's. But if it doesn't happen in the build-up to the European Championships, then it is hard to see how and when there will be a reconnection between Light and Dark Blue going forward.

Now is the time for Rangers to become prominent and lead the way for Scotland, both on and off the park, once again.
Must be losing more readers,once an avid buyer of this paper stopped buying it around 2003/4 when it gradually became the Celtic view,and after a few letters and e mail to their editor,with no reply,sorry for the workers but hope it dies like the rhecord and evening times!strangely the article is quite true !
 
Couldn’t care less about Scotland, seriously fed up hearing about this great achievement already fs! UEFA has 58 registered nations and 24 qualify for the euros its hardly a massive achievement in my eyes
 
It would take a hell of a shift in attitude from teuchters and the boo rangers brigade and moonhowling yesser types.

They ain't going to change though so bears ain't going to feel welcome unless bears go act the way these mongos do and see if they like it. :)
 
Last edited:
The supporters of the biggest clubs in most countries are indifferent to their national sides.

We act like this is unique to us. It absolutely is not.
 
It's quite simple really.

You strip down the SFA and SPFL, kick out every single one of them and bring in people who are non partisan.​
SFA and SPFL apologise to Rangers for the way they were treated post 2012 with massive financial compensation.​
You get rid of the vile nationalist element of the Scotland support.​

Then you might get Rangers fans coming back to Scotland games.
 
So no mention of the Tammany Hall corruption and bias at the SFA that has, in recent years, been turned into a cudgel to beat Rangers by Liewells machinations. An organisation that is against bigotry yet employs Malky Mackay. An SFA that has a vocal anti-Rangers bigot in Rod McKenzie at the top table. An SFA that will only appoint Compliance Officers with a Celtc minded background and history. An SFA that has looked the other way for decades at the plethora of paedophiles who have wandered the corridors, dressing rooms, training fields and Directors Box of Celtc Park and voted the culpable Members of Celtc's board to the highest echelons of their establishment. Spotted the common denominator yet? Oh! but we should just naively separate them in our minds from their select team and roll up, pay our Blue Pounds, and nod along appreciatively to the Anglophobic dirge that is "Flower of Scotland".
Why is it the current coaching posts are all taken up by the celtic minded - Clarke, MacKay, Gemmill, etc?

McLeish had Grant as second in command, and he wasn't there for his coaching prowess, just to show neutrality
 
Sad but after 2012 and the IndyRef, I abandoned the National team to the Natsis and the Republicans.

Personally, I don’t see any way back. I hope my kids don’t feel the same way, as I had some great nights watching Scotland with my dad and my uncles, but those days are gone for me and I cannot forgive the rest of Scottish football for revelling in our pain, or the SFA fronted by people that hate my club.
 
It's hard to believe but back in the 40s,50s,60s, and into the 70s. Probably 90% of Scotland supporters were Rangers supporters. And many of they supporters wore their Rangers scarves to international matches. There are many reasons in other posts as to why Rangers supporters feel the way they do regarding the national team. Back in the day, I went to many Scotland games, Home internationals, WC qualifiers, friendlies and I genuinely feel sad that I no longer care whether they win or lose. Representing your country is one of the greatest honors a footballer could have. But the way Rangers players are treated by their fellow countrymen I could understand any Scottish Rangers player choosing not to be considered for their country.
 
They're booing their own national anthem the scum. We're all British and subjects of Her Majesty. Long may she reign over us.
Exactly alot of people forget or are not very well educated to the fact that Scotland isn’t a country , it doesn’t have sovereignty to be classed as a country it’s only a nation in the country of the United Kingdom
 
Article in the Herald. Says it like it is really.



THE relationship between Rangers - or more specifically Rangers supporters - and the Scotland national team is a complex yet fascinating one.

It encompasses every aspect of life on and off the park as political opinions and club loyalties shape views and define behaviours when it comes to the support, or not, of the side that represent the country on the world stage.

At times it feels as though sections of the Rangers fanbase have never been more disillusioned or out of touch with Scotland and in many ways that disconnect is completely understandable. But, in a purely football and sporting sense, Scotland are good for Rangers and Rangers must be good for Scotland.

Steven Gerrard has spoken of his desire to see Scotland improve and succeed, and also of his delight at his players earning international recognition in recent times. The likes of Borna Barisic and Glen Kamara will be at the Euros next summer. That will raise their profile, but also that of Rangers and having players operating at the highest level can only further enhance the club's reputation. Gerrard has done so much on that front in a European sense and the more internationalists Rangers have the better. It is a shame, though, that there are not more players within Gerrard's ranks that can stake a claim to feature for Steve Clarke.

Going forward, and as the Ibrox squad evolves, that should be a consideration for Rangers and a club that has given so much to the national side over the years must once again be able to provide the backbone of the Scotland setup. Ryan Jack has become a mainstay of the side under Clarke in recent fixtures, but some Gers fans will only tune in to see if he plays well and emerges unscathed for his return to domestic and European duty.

The pride that Jack has in playing for his country is clear to see and it should be hoped that rubs off on those who dismiss Scotland duty. Rangers could certainly do with more like him and goalkeeper Jon McLaughlin. The lack of Rangers representation in the national squad over recent years may explain the apathy that some sections of the support have towards Scotland these days.

But more wide-ranging issues - such as the treatment their club received in 2012 and the Independence Referendum two years later - almost certainly have a significant part to play in the seeming shift away from the traditional backing that Gers fans once provided to the national side.

Last month, The Athletic carried out a survey of more than 8000 supporters to attempt to paint a picture of the relationship between Rangers fans and Scotland. There is no definitive answer to such a convoluted question, but it did at least offer an insight when it comes to the club versus country debate.

From a football viewpoint, it was no surprise to see that 68 per cent stated that their support for the national team had decreased since 2012. The feelings of anger and resentment from the fall-out of Rangers' financial collapse clearly still lingers in the minds of many and there is no desire to share a terrace or emotional connection with fans of clubs who wished them nothing but ill will eight years ago.

Indeed, 87 per cent of those that responded to The Athletic believed they would receive a negative reaction if they identified as a Rangers fan at a Scotland match. It is hard to conclude that figure would be as high for any other support in the country and while Rangers punters may dismiss it with the 'no-one likes us, we don't care' attitude, it is sad that fans feel they would be unwelcome at an event that is supposed to unite in the backing of a common, national cause.

While fans across the country revelled in Rangers' fight for survival and subsequent plights on their journey back, the Ibrox crowd remained admirably loyal and devoted to their club and their cause. Having come through what they have, the bond between fan and club is stronger than ever.

Many will have taken heart and pleasure from seeing Scotland end their wait to return to a major finals with victory over Serbia last week. But it will be nothing compared to the emotions when Rangers win their 55th league title. Scotland matters, but just not as much as Rangers, or as much as it does to fans of other clubs.

The team on the park is only part of the problem, though, and many will simply find it unpalatable to support Scotland for reasons other than football. When Scotland is divided politically, it is no surprise that the makeup of the fanbase is as well. While 55 per cent of those in the poll didn't think that being a Unionist was an important part of a Rangers fan's identity, 75 per cent believed that Nationalism was synonymous with the Scotland support.

It is too simplistic to say that the dual identity of being Scottish and British doesn't fit amongst the national support but views on Government and the Union will come into the thinking for some. Figures for ideology and voting preference in a referendum were broadly similar at around 65 per cent Unionist, 10 per cent Nationalist and a quarter neither.

In decades gone by, the Rangers support made up a huge percentage of the Tartan Army home and away and it would be healthy if the numbers were to swell once again. Scotland is as much theirs as it is anyone else's. But if it doesn't happen in the build-up to the European Championships, then it is hard to see how and when there will be a reconnection between Light and Dark Blue going forward.

Now is the time for Rangers to become prominent and lead the way for Scotland, both on and off the park, once again.
NAH
 
I used to go to the games and I watched the Serbia game and cheered them on.

I was at the cyprus game with my 80 year old father in law and some pissed up Edinburgh ned started fighting with one some sort of partick thistle fan with a tartan scarf in front of me. Stewards ended up turning the lot of them out. The games hadn't even kicked off.

I looked around and just felt like I didn't belong. I sit at Ibrox when we're allowed and although I don't know many of those around me (I'm quite antisocial) I feel like I belong there.

I'll take an interest in the games, I'll hold a conversation with friends who are into it, but I'm not fussed. I don't feel like I'm particularly missing out tbh.
 
I don’t remember an article in a similar vein when the RoI were playing Scotland in a Euro qualifier in the late 80’s at Hampden when half the Gallogate and East end where in the opposition end
 
That's the most positive article about us I've seen in the mhedia for a long time. I wonder why the SFA and the cabal would want Rangers fans to back the national team. They make no secret they hate us and everything we stand for but still want our cash. Bankrupt of money and morals.
They want our money. poets support oirland so they need our support, vocally and financially. They haven't had any support since they let Duncan Ferguson get sent to jail for nothing. And things went from bad to worse since then. They wont be getting my support ever again and I revel in every defeat they get. I can only support Rangers. I feel sorry for those who want to support a corrupt, bigoted, organisation such as the SFA. The SPFL are no better and I hope one day we have a breakaway British league to get away from the SPFL. Or till the bigoted corrupt cabal leave
the spfl and sfa.
 
It wasn't just the SFA and the mentally challengeds that laughed and fcked us over in 2012. It was every neutral, every governing body, every club, every fan, every journalist, everyone.
Anywhere that's population votes in an organisation which has IRA supporters and child abuse deniers has nothing to do with me.
British not Scottish. No Surrender.

This.
 
It wasn't just the SFA and the mentally challengeds that laughed and fcked us over in 2012. It was every neutral, every governing body, every club, every fan, every journalist, everyone.
Anywhere that's population votes in an organisation which has IRA supporters and child abuse deniers has nothing to do with me.
British not Scottish. No Surrender.
Amen brother, a-fucking-men.

Absolutely spot on.
 
Didn’t want us, didn’t need us. Directors of Scottish clubs, from top to bottom, didn’t just think this, they said it publicly as well.
There was no attempt by the SFA to put a stop to this, in fact they encouraged it.
They took every chance they could to put the boot in, even invented rules to do so.
What do they want us for now?
They chose to pander to the “Irish Club” (irony of ironies), I see nothing wrong in us ploughing our own furrow and leaving them to get on with it.
I don't want to be in their company, I won’t have any respect for them and I won’t do anything to assist them either.
Not until, at the very least, the entire Scottish football establishment is fumigated from top to bottom.
I’ll watch the occasional Scotland game from afar, but I’ll never again pay to get in.
 
Never been into the International scene, seen Scotland once v NI, came out and got abused by mentally challengeds as they had just won the league previously at Parkhead, the Doyle got sent off game, feck knows what they were doing there.
Anyway have little or no interest in them, my son thinks it sad, feck them Rangers hating dicks, that is all.
 
Back
Top