Portadown_Bear
Well-Known Member
I was talking bout Ojo mate.Been Told Kent is a goer though.
Another loan for Kent I presume?
I was talking bout Ojo mate.Been Told Kent is a goer though.
Are you suggesting we’re told we must play loanees?
“Plan”. We’ll see. I highly doubt he’ll go for that much.
The quote at the time concerning the Liverpool players was that Liverpool did not demand these assurances.It's quite common for loans to have clauses in them for this. I'm sure some state teams must pay extra if the player doesn't play a certain amount of games. Gerrard's touched on it before and I'm sure Warburton mentioned it too.
Without wanting to derail the topic of the thread I think that's why Worrall and Coulibaly (first half of the season) played so much.
Unless liverpool are going to sell kent i dont see why they wouldnt loant him back to us. European football, plays every week, performing well, playing in pressurised environment. These are things he wont get being loaned to another club, unless its in the prem but i cant see that happening this yearI think the reason we have Ojo all but confirms we won’t get Kent.
This is a wee sweetener.
And Morelos.
Playing for a team like Palace would benefit him. Rangers would be good, but a regular in the EPL would be better. I personally don't think he's good enough for the EPL. He'll go to a good Championship team on a permanent deal.Unless liverpool are going to sell kent i dont see why they wouldnt loant him back to us. European football, plays every week, performing well, playing in pressurised environment. These are things he wont get being loaned to another club, unless its in the prem but i cant see that happening this year
Obligatory
If you look at teams of that level then i cant see kent getting in the team. The Epl teams have players better than kent that they will rely upon Like you i think championship is where he would go.Playing for a team like Palace would benefit him. Rangers would be good, but a regular in the EPL would be better. I personally don't think he's good enough for the EPL. He'll go to a good Championship team on a permanent deal.
Are you suggesting we’re told we must play loanees?
When was Kent poor and who was a better option than him at that time?
It's quite common for loans to have clauses in them for this. I'm sure some state teams must pay extra if the player doesn't play a certain amount of games. Gerrard's touched on it before and I'm sure Warburton mentioned it too.
Without wanting to derail the topic of the thread I think that's why Worrall and Coulibaly (first half of the season) played so much.
Happened with Worrall.
Not seen anything of this boy.
How does he compare to Kent?
Happened with Worrall.