Was it not against Killie after Jack got sent off? Kirk Broadfoot being a cheating knob.Bruno Alves took one - can't remember who it was against but it never came to anything.
Exactly what I was thinking.Was it not against Killie after Jack got sent off? Kirk Broadfoot being a cheating knob.
Basically cost Pedro his job* IIRC.
(*Straw that broke the camel's back)
I've never understood why players don't just shoot rather than getting a touch to the side which invariably gets blocked. In all probability a direct shot will take a touch or deflection on its way in any case.
Are you that Zaire defender?I've never understood why players don't just shoot rather than getting a touch to the side which invariably gets blocked. In all probability a direct shot will take a touch or deflection on its way in any case.
Was it not against Killie after Jack got sent off? Kirk Broadfoot being a cheating knob.
Basically cost Pedro his job* IIRC.
(*Straw that broke the camel's back)
He knows, he is saying that the chances are it will take a deflection and therefore be counted as a goal...The clue is in the name. It’s an indirect free kick so a player has to take a touch before another player can take a shot.
Ether that or just roll it straight back and as everyone and their dog charge off the line, just have a player loft it over everyone into the empty net.I've never understood why players don't just shoot rather than getting a touch to the side which invariably gets blocked. In all probability a direct shot will take a touch or deflection on its way in any case.
You’re wrong with that one bud.The clue is in the name. It’s an indirect free kick so a player has to take a touch before another player can take a shot.
One of my earliest memories of us, I think it's stuck because it was so odd to see. We were in the red away kit and Boyd scored for Killie.The last one I remember us scoring was Amoruso at Rugby Park in 2002, 2-2 draw.
They're a rare occurrence these days anyway.
In the knowThe clue is in the name. It’s an indirect free kick so a player has to take a touch before another player can take a shot.
You’re wrong with that one bud.
You can shoot at goal from an indirect free kick as long as it touches an opponent/teammate on the way into the goal.
In the know
Bollocks.You are not allowed to shoot at goal until one of your players touches the ball.
A deflection would still be from the direct shot and the kick would be retaken.
“The clue is in the name” ranks highly in the smart arse stakes and it’s even funnier because you’re wrong.You would know all about ironic log in names
Try adding to the debate by contributing facts rather than trying to act like a smart arse.
Correct.“The clue is in the name” ranks highly in the smart arse stakes and it’s even funnier because you’re wrong.
“Let’s start with an obvious one - what exactly is an indirect free-kick? Simply put, this is a way of re-starting a football match that means the ball cannot be kicked directly into the goal. In order for a goal to be scored from an indirect free-kick, the ball must be touched by a player from either team before it crosses the goal line. If a goal is scored from an indirect free-kick without having gained a touch from another player then the defending team is awarded a goal kick.”
Always remember Amo skying it against Dunfermline in the title decider in 2003. I’m sure we had actually dropped to 2nd at that point aswell.
Nothing wrong with healthy debate.I'm a week clean from posting in threads that have arguments in them and thought I'd start a thread that surely couldn't end in one.
Thanks to those who contributed toward the answer.
Nothing wrong with healthy debate.