Brave13VVV
Well-Known Member
With exception of the jungle jims, has anyone seen much feedback from fans of other clubs?
Can I just check, is our position you divide up all the price money evenly among 42 member clubs and each take a share? I’ve read out statement but wasn’t 100% sure it was what we proposed.
Also are we saying put a line through this season and start afresh next year if fixtures cannot be fulfilled ?
The actual distribution of the prize ££ wasn't made very clear
It just said, "to be distributed amongst all clubs throughout Scotland". It's a bit ambiguous. So Brechin City get the same as us, mentally challengeds, sheep etc? I'd have no problem with that, but it needs made clearThat’s what I thought but everyone seems to be assuming it’s evenly split and I didn’t take that as a given from the statement.
Thought I had missed something.
Think ours is mainly to get enough clubs onside to ensure the SPFL one failsRecord reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
Record reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
That's the thing that could unfurl them in the end if they block it they then piss off the rest of the clubs big timeRecord reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
This is what I reckon will happen.You gotta expect the scum to counter this tomorrow with a different proposal, probably encouraging league reconstruction, no relegation to bring hearts back on to their side.
That’s what I thought but everyone seems to be assuming it’s evenly split and I didn’t take that as a given from the statement.
Thought I had missed something.
Simple! It suits their agenda!Record reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
UEFA really are pointless now absolute shitebag to take command.
Record reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
Ayr Utd Chairman on twitter saying he will recommend that Ayr vote for the SPFL proposal.
What have they got to gain? They are losing a promotion play off?
What have they got to gain? They are losing a promotion play off?
Cause Peter said soRecord reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
Think its a member of there board not chairman but reading his tweets he seems to be suggesting there is no other option for them as he does not see the season being finished as realistic and its the only option they have been given so they can survive he is also saying he would prefer reconstitutes to a 16 team premiership.
What about the turnover to income factor?I took the opposite from it - that we were suggesting that money goes the way it normally goes.
We may have been deliberately vague. It’s not up to us how it’s distributed or even if it’s all distributed now. We’re just saying that it should start being distributed right now and does not need a decision on how the league is wrapped up to start doing that.
Personally, I think we should call for a relatively equitable distribution if only to get everyone to support us.
I also think that there shouldn’t be a completely equal distribution - it shouldn’t just be the total divided by 42. The running costs of the professional clubs are considerably higher than that of the amateur clubs. You could either have 2 pots - maybe 2/3 for equal distribution amongst all professional clubs and 1/3 for the others - or staggered distribution across the leagues with equal distribution within the league - say 7/18 to SPL, 5/18 to Championship and 3/18 to division 2 and 3 or something like that.
Hopefully our resolution which gets them the money they are due without giving up any of their integrity gets their support.
If UEFA decide, it will be in the interest of the big leagues.Hearts, Partick thistle and Rangers have all gone public today about not voting for this nonsense Falkirk I expect will soon join.
Not seen any official statement backing the plan yet but the yahoos and Dundee Utd will no doubt issue a statement in the next few days saying they back it.
Looks like Scottish football will be split down the middle because of this that’s why an independent body like Uefa should be getting off their backsides and making this call across Europe.
I find it incredible that the idea of null and void can be knocked on the head by all and sundry, yet any other half baked idea gets thrown on the table and offered as a valid solution to the problem.With exception of the jungle jims, has anyone seen much feedback from fans of other clubs?
Why do you find it incredible that the idea of null and void can be knocked on the head.I find it incredible that the idea of null and void can be knocked on the head by all and sundry, yet any other half baked idea gets thrown on the table and offered as a valid solution to the problem.
What about the turnover to income factor?
Clubs who pay more to players in their league, with rich owners who subsidise players wages with other income?
Should they get the same handout as clubs who pay what they take in?
Cove? Ross county? Albion rovers? Many more.
The whole narrative seems to be that Null and void our be the fairest solution but we are so at the behest of sponsons and tv companies that we literally can’t do that.
Very strange considering our national sponsorship deals are atrocious and losing 30% of them really doesn’t seem like it should be a game ending situation. It’s not exactly the EPLs billion pound penalty.
Basically if it werent for money dictating the game we would cancel the season which to be honest is a Terrible thing to have confirmed.
I also just can’t understand why declaring it null and void would be any different from a TV contract viewpoint from declaring it over with current standings final. Both stop the final games from being played and so create contention with the TV companies.
Completing the league is likely to be impossible. So we have to breach the contract. So it has nothing at all to do with the decision to award championships or just void the season.
Peadophiles know their prayRecord reporting they don’t think the Rangers proposal will get off the ground because it would require ‘near unanimous support’ from Premier League clubs. Hinting, I think,that our proposal would require 90% (11-1) approval rather than the 75% (9-3) the SPFL one needs. Why would that be?
Can,t see how they could be liable for money back as this is a pandemic .football has closed on government orders.act of god and all that .also as you have pointed out imagine the bad publicity attached to this as well.You’re right. They have had the same value whether it’s voided or ended early.
Legally perhaps some weasel lawyer language may entitle them to their money back. BUT I can just imagine sky and by taking the Scottish game to court to reclaim 100% of the broadcast rights of which 75% have already shown. Imagine the negative PR that would bring
Any company sueing our game after a global pandemic will be doomed before it starts. They wouldn’t dare
Is it not going to be 2 separate votes? One for the lower league and hold off on the Premiership as long as they can to see if games can get played.