Best:
Andy Goram £1m. Paid for himself time and time again. That night at Parkhead in 1996 9iar season we won 1-0. Laudrup first half goal. End to end stuff the whole night. Goram saved a screamer of a free kick from Van Hooijdonk. Gazza went on to miss a penalty and Van Vossen blootered a tap-in into Tollcross. Last 5 minutes we gave away a penalty. After playing so well but being unlucky in front of goal it was all about to be undone. Big Hooijdonk steps up. Blooters it. Goram gets down on it faster than a central station hooker. Punches the ball to ****. Obscenities were shouted. The game was saved. That was worth £1m alone.
Worst value. As suggested. Flo!
Strong candidate. Never thought Ball was a real full back. Seemed most comfortable in the back three that Hoddle had England using. And was he ever really fit?Michael Ball was one of the first names I thought of for the worst. Paying circa £6M for him when we had Numan in his prime was just complete madness.
We certainly got our moneys worth out of big Boyd (first stint).
Leave Berti alone
If we are discounting Bosmans then best would be possibly Cooper at £100k or McCoist at £185k. Worst, well, Prodan, Konterman maybe.Let's have them, who was best value for money and who was the worst? Note that when nominating your best, a fee has to have been paid for said player, we're not counting bosmans.
I have a feeling Flo will end up dominating the "worst" category though if you consider his goal return the how much we recouped i don't think it's actually that cut and dry.
No. Ian Redford cost £200k plus before him.Was £180k for McCoist our most expensive transfer fee at the time?