Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.Pay as you play is probably illegal and not a real thing.
Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.Pay as you play is probably illegal and not a real thing.
Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.
Absolutely. The pace and physical nature of Scottish football means that no matter how good you are, if your fitness isn’t up to scratch you are going to struggle big time.If I had a quid for everytime I seen that kind of comment on this board for it to blow up on us I'd be on a cruise right now.
Krancjar. Dorrans. Barton. Bruno Alves etc etc.
Probably would be something like a minimum monthly then bonus per game.Pay as you play is probably illegal and not a real thing.
And we would need him why?
The last thing we need is another central midfielder. Especially one who over the past few seasons has done next to nothing.
Very disturbing article but no surpriseI think you'll need to watch your step, mate:
Revealed: the press regulator’s leaked guidelines on Islamophobia | The Spectator
The free press is facing a new threat from Ipsowww.spectator.co.uk
It's perfectly legal. You pay less of a wage (say, 4k/week) with an enormous appearance / unused sub bonus (say 16k).Pay as you play is probably illegal and not a real thing.
Did he play for Winterfell ?Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.
Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.
Ok sorry xChill out
Does no one remember Jon Stark? Matchwinner for hire. £1,000 per match plus £250 per goal. Yer making me feel oldWas that before he joined the Nights Watch ?
Persoanlly I think we should just sign him for the hubris.
ExactlyI will never ever understand the mentality of some folk.
We have 100 midfielders, why do we need 1 more?
Because he will be in the top3 midfielders at our club. Improving the team, that's why.
It's perfectly legal. You pay less of a wage (say, 4k/week) with an enormous appearance / unused sub bonus (say 16k).
That's how it works in practice.
When people say pay as you play, this is what they're referring to.Aye, so not pay as you play then.
Well aye, pay the majority of your wage if you play, really not that hard mate.Aye, so not pay as you play then.
Well aye, pay the majority of your wage if you play, really not that hard mate.
The point in pay as you play is to minimise the risk of large sums of money, on a player who may not be able to play 30-40 games a season. They still need a wage, but they get the bulk of it by playing games.Still getting paid whether you play or not
The point in pay as you play is to minimise the risk of large sums of money, on a player who may not be able to play 30-40 games a season. They still need a wage, but they get the bulk of it by playing games.
I honestly don’t know how you are struggling with that? Or are you just being dense? Latter methinks.
He would properly cost a bit more to.Because Juventus legend Marchisio, even if done, would offer a better option than Docherty.
He would properly cost a bit more to.
Quite a scoop tbh...Not true. I remember Jon Stark on a pay as you play contract when I was young.
I don't know any of the Jon Starks being referred to on this thread
It's like that, only footballers brag much less about their wages than offshore workers...Its like an offshore contractor
You have a basic
And then everyday offshore you have a bonus
Not rocket science
You know nothing, Jon StarkI don't know any of the Jon Starks being referred to on this thread
Huge disappointment in a Rangers jersey for me.Trevor Francis was pay as you play (at his own request) with Rangers back in the 80’s.
finally, someone understood!Quite a scoop tbh...
It's like that, only footballers brag much less about their wages than offshore workers...
I remember him being superb in his debut v Dunfermline. But after that, not much.Huge disappointment in a Rangers jersey for me.
Because Juventus legend Marchisio, even if done, would offer a better option than Docherty.
Tis guy has a decent track record with his info. Must be something to it. it is a curious one though.NimaTavRood who broke the Helander story has just said on Rocksport that he knows for certain Rangers want to sign Marchisio and have contacted him/his agent.
No formal contract talks have taken place as he hasn't made any decisions.
Tis guy has a decent track record with his info. Must be something to it. it is a curious one though.
Aye but whose legsThere may be legs in this