Okay, distilled from the anger, drink (!), and lashings of excellent common sense posts:
Reasons to change -
He is a bottle merchant in 'must win games'; his players don't seem willing to give 100% for him - the 'team of fighters' was nowhere to be seen yesterday; we all know the climb back will be long and no-one seriously expected us to have same manager, or even just 1 or 2 managers; he has spunked half our budget on two Mexican duds; he actually played Windass as #10 yesterday - criminal offence let alone a footballing one; his 'tactics' are obscure and look very like long ball punts up the park; we can expect better - and do - than "Oh we're in the pack for 3rd, how exciting"; tough fixtures ahead and not many 'easy points' now.
Reasons to be cautious -
Board are 100% the good guys but clearly have no serious money to invest or ideas to leverage any; where we want to be is at the moment impossible to reach based on current budgets - could Pep win the league?; it will cost at least £3M to swap him for McInnes - we don't have it; can a new manager really make these guys lean, fit, well drilled winners?; what about the Mexican flops - we will NEVER get £4m back for them...can we really switch managers and leave them adrift?; maybe he does need time to make his systems work.
However....I understand that a lot of the bottom section is defeatist. A lot of the reasons to stick and not twist are based on caution and a lowering of standards. I heard it yesterday on way back to car...lots of groups of pals arguing and every group had at least one: "Ach we're pish now...big support but not a big team...2nd or 3rd is where we are." I worry that becomes a majority view...we downsize mentally as well as materially. I would argue we need to invoke the spirit of the red and black campaign...but that's another thread.
Reasons to change -
He is a bottle merchant in 'must win games'; his players don't seem willing to give 100% for him - the 'team of fighters' was nowhere to be seen yesterday; we all know the climb back will be long and no-one seriously expected us to have same manager, or even just 1 or 2 managers; he has spunked half our budget on two Mexican duds; he actually played Windass as #10 yesterday - criminal offence let alone a footballing one; his 'tactics' are obscure and look very like long ball punts up the park; we can expect better - and do - than "Oh we're in the pack for 3rd, how exciting"; tough fixtures ahead and not many 'easy points' now.
Reasons to be cautious -
Board are 100% the good guys but clearly have no serious money to invest or ideas to leverage any; where we want to be is at the moment impossible to reach based on current budgets - could Pep win the league?; it will cost at least £3M to swap him for McInnes - we don't have it; can a new manager really make these guys lean, fit, well drilled winners?; what about the Mexican flops - we will NEVER get £4m back for them...can we really switch managers and leave them adrift?; maybe he does need time to make his systems work.
However....I understand that a lot of the bottom section is defeatist. A lot of the reasons to stick and not twist are based on caution and a lowering of standards. I heard it yesterday on way back to car...lots of groups of pals arguing and every group had at least one: "Ach we're pish now...big support but not a big team...2nd or 3rd is where we are." I worry that becomes a majority view...we downsize mentally as well as materially. I would argue we need to invoke the spirit of the red and black campaign...but that's another thread.