uneasydaz
Well-Known Member
How could he have handled it differently it was a red card and he gave him a red
The way Clancy or Collum would have?In what way could he have handled it differently?
Maybe he thinks he should have been given the opportunity to sub him off instead of being sent off. There is a precedent after all!Genuinely bemused at what he thinks an alternative would be. The guy is scum - just like everything to do with that rancid club.
Good shout - cheating refereesMaybe he thinks he should have been given the opportunity to sub him off instead of being sent off. There is a precedent after all!
Turned a blind eye as usually happens.In what way could he have handled it differently?
My first thought. Happened twice already this season.Maybe he thinks he should have been given the opportunity to sub him off instead of being sent off. There is a precedent after all!
So, he thinks his player should be let off with a shocker of a tackle even though it was a red card. He has clearly been watching the press conferences of the fat Aussie and previous scum managers as thats the sort of thing they would say!How could he have handled it differently it was a red card and he gave him a red
This is the standard line now.Given the referee the "opportunity" to send him off-what could he possibly be implying?
Maybe he thinks he should have been given the opportunity to sub him off instead of being sent off. There is a precedent after all!
Twice for us this season, the Livi boy then the wee rat on loan at St JohnstoneIs there? Wtf.
Twice for us this season, the Livi boy then the wee rat on loan at St Johnstone
Is what he was wanting, these types of challenges need stamped out of Scottish football,Maybe he thinks he should have been given the opportunity to sub him off instead of being sent off. There is a precedent after all!
Aye remember the livi player first game of the seasonIs there? Wtf.
It's a red card, but it was against Rangers so the ref usually just lets it go.
No wonder Neilson is asking the question.