I wonder is the stats would reflect this.
Like how damaged were their results without iniesta.
And how damaged are our results without jack.
I feel like our results are mike's miles better with Jack in the team. He's probably the most vital cog imho.
Stats shmats. 88% of stats are made up. 47% of people know this.
Like the "debate" over whether Messi is the greatest player in the world, or Federer is the GOAT in tennis, people will provide all sorts of stats to prove otherwise, but as Gary Neville said "sometimes you just need to go with what you can see with your own eyes".
Take the "assist" stat for example; load of pish. Say Borna puts in 10 pin point crosses, but Alfie is having an off day and fluffs all ten. Borna is denied 10 "assists" due to a team mate having a bad day. Next game, Borna has an off day, puts in 8 stinking crosses, overhit, too long, or hits first man; by luck 2 make it somewhere near the danger area, but this time Alfie is at the races, takes a good touch, spins majestically and scores each time.
Game 1 above, Borna gets 0 stats.
Game 2 above, Borna gets 2 assists.
Or what about, say, Iniesta skins the whole Real Madrid team on a wonder run, chips in brilliantly to the back post, where Neymar makes a cünt of a simple header to an open goal, and it bounces off the keeper to Messi's feet, who taps in? Messi gets 1 goal in the stats, Neymar gets 1 assist, and Iniesta gets fück all.
Or Kamara playing a simple, non-killer, bog standard pass to Defoe, who completely dummies the ball for Arfield to run on to and score vs Celtic? This actually happened in the 2-0 game at Ibrox in 2019. Kamara gets an assist, even though he never intended to play a killer ball, and Defoe gets nothing, despite being the main cause of it becoming a goal.
In short, I don't care what the stats say, there is no universe where I will agree that Ryan Jack is as important to Rangers as Iniesta was to Barcelona.